[no subject]

H IFCDIP00 Ed -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

[no subject]

In <1322103310.15944.yahoomailmob...@web161401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>, on 11/23/2011 at 06:55 PM, Ed Gould said: >How about IEHIOSUP :) Okay, that's two. Any more? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see We don'

[no subject]

GRIN... How about IEHIOSUP :) Ed -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-mai

[no subject]

In <1322004261.2492.yahoomailmob...@web161402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>, on 11/22/2011 at 03:24 PM, Ed Gould said: >I do not know if the OEM has been integrated into any of IBM >offerings or not , I semi doubt it. The real point is that it (sort) >is a parameterized program not a true utility. With

[no subject]

John, I think you would be hard pressed not to find a MVS machine that did not have some sort of sort installed. now whether it is. The full compatibility of the two main sorts are equilivant. One can quible over one point or the other but they are running neck and neck. What made our decisio

[no subject]

John Chase wrote: | "Everybody" has a SORT utility. Not everybody has a [PL/I|other HLL] compiler. This, I suppose, is nearly true. Not quite everyone has DFSORT or SYNCHSORT, and almost everyone has some IBM statement-level procedural-language compiler and the HLASM; but neither of these facto

[no subject]

Huh Sent from my iPhone -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

, John Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 2:33 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject) > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hardee, Charles H > > I'm using 2007 and when I right click on the message an

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hardee, Charles H > > I'm using 2007 and when I right click on the message and choose "message options" in the list, I get > "internet headers" in the display. Is that what you're looking for? YES!! Exactly!! Thanks

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

In , on 07/15/2011 at 11:58 AM, "Hardee, Charles H" said: >I'm using 2007 and when I right click on the message and choose >"message options" in the list, I get "internet headers" in the >display. Is that what you're looking for? Probably. The first few Received: header fields are inserted b

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

Subject Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject) 07/15/2011 11:39 AM

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject) Thread-Index: AcxDAl+8t4hTmoeMSZmi7SUYKEQCTQAAqTkwAAC45NA= References: <010701cc4285$58d528f0$0a7f7ad0$@us>

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 10:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject) In <010701cc4285$58d528f0$0a7f7ad0$@us>, on 07/14/2011 at 07:22 PM, Jim Thomas said: >I have on several occasions, to include the recent,

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 10:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject) In <010701cc4285$58d528f0$0a7f7ad0$@us>, on 07/14/2011 at 07:22 PM, Jim Thomas said: >I have on several occasions, t

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

har...@ca.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 10:40 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject) > -Original Message- > Fr

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

ba...@mxg.com (Barry Merrill) writes: > "PROFS was Ollie North's downfall" > > Actually, it was the site's VERY GOOD backup philosophy that > kept backups long-term, and the PROFS implementation at that > site that when the user "deleted" a message, it wasn't deleted. almost every such datacenter

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) > > In <010701cc4285$58d528f0$0a7f7ad0$@us>, on 07/14/2011 >at 07:22 PM, Jim Thomas said: > > >I have on several occasions, to include the recent, received emails > >that look very legitim

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

"PROFS was Ollie North's downfall" Actually, it was the site's VERY GOOD backup philosophy that kept backups long-term, and the PROFS implementation at that site that when the user "deleted" a message, it wasn't deleted. Barry Merrill -

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

In , on 07/14/2011 at 03:27 PM, August Carideo said: >PROFS was Ollie North's downfall When a person shoots himself in the foot, I don't blame the pistol. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see We don't care

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

In <010701cc4285$58d528f0$0a7f7ad0$@us>, on 07/14/2011 at 07:22 PM, Jim Thomas said: >I have on several occasions, to include the recent, received emails >that look very legitimate Did you look at the Received: header fields? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO posi

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

al Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 1:18 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject) Chase, John wrote: >Anybody ever gotten anything like this b

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent by: IBM cc Mainframe Discussion List Subject h

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

Chase, John wrote: >Anybody ever gotten anything like this before? We don't run VM, and >I've not sent any files to IBM since April, when I last opened a PMR. Give Walter Farrell the full e-mail header. That will give you and him the trail from where that mail is coming from. The part '@d03av0

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:53:00 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote: >On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:45:06 -0500, Chase, John wrote: > >>Anybody ever gotten anything like this before? We don't run VM, and >>I've not sent any files to IBM since April, when I last opened a PMR. >> > >Apparently a former IBMer was sub

Re: FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:45:06 -0500, Chase, John wrote: >Anybody ever gotten anything like this before? We don't run VM, and >I've not sent any files to IBM since April, when I last opened a PMR. > Apparently a former IBMer was subscribed to IBM-MAIN and left without unsubscribing, and you (and

FW: Mysterious Email (original had no subject)

Anybody ever gotten anything like this before? We don't run VM, and I've not sent any files to IBM since April, when I last opened a PMR. -jc- > -Original Message- > From: rscs.system.at.s39...@d03av06.boulder.ibm.com > [mailto:rscs.system.at.s39...@d03av06.boulder.ibm.com] > Sent:

[no subject]

Hi, How do I find out, researching control blocks, preferably, if running Top Secret or RACFon z / OS? Thanks in advance. José ADAUTO Ribeiro -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lis

Changing Changeman PDSs to PDSEs (Was: No Subject)

Subject added On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:00:48 -0400, Whitehair, John wrote: >Has anyone had experience changing Changeman PDSs to PDSEs? > >John R. Whitehair >MVS Systems Programmer >Forethought Financial Services >812-933-6730 (office) >john.whiteh...@forethought.com

[no subject]

Has anyone had experience changing Changeman PDSs to PDSEs? John R. Whitehair MVS Systems Programmer Forethought Financial Services 812-933-6730 (office) john.whiteh...@forethought.com -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arch

[no subject]

Yes, GTF could certainly do it, and I think the ENQ monitor would also. My point was that his "experiment" would prove nothing. On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) < shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net > wrote: > In , on > 01/25/2011 >at 11:06 AM, Scott Rowe said: > > >I have

[no subject]

In , on 01/25/2011 at 11:06 AM, Scott Rowe said: >I have no need or desire to perform your "simple >experiment", as it would prove nothing, since even if the RESERVE is >making it to the hardware without being converted, it could be so >short as to not be observable. GTF. -- Shmuel (

[no subject]

John, I am so very sorry that I confused you by my use of "uses" versus "use" in my reply, but my intended point still applies: Binder and/or Linkage editor processing still issue a RESERVE against their target (at least in the case of a PDS). I would suggest that there are far more egregious err

Re: Testing hardware RESERVE (was: no subject)

On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:58:29 -0600, Walt Farrell wrote: >On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:56:51 +, john gilmore wrote: > >>I suggest that Mr. Rowe conduct a simple experiment, as I just did. Bind a >set of object modules into library >>A and write something into dataset B, located on the same notional

Testing hardware RESERVE (was: no subject)

On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:56:51 +, john gilmore wrote: >I suggest that Mr. Rowe conduct a simple experiment, as I just did. Bind a set of object modules into library >A and write something into dataset B, located on the same notional volume. He will find that he can do these >operations conc

Re: Hardware RESERVE vs GRS ENQ (was: No Subject)

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of john gilmore > > Scott Rowe wrote: > > | The linkedit/Binder still uses a hardware reserve. > > I has been a very long time since it did so, materially as opposed to formally. For the Linkage > Editor the reserve ha

[no subject]

Scott Rowe wrote: | The linkedit/Binder still uses a hardware reserve. I has been a very long time since it did so, materially as opposed to formally. For the Linkage Editor the reserve has been converted into a global enq using GRS for many years. Moreover, whjil;e I cannopt prove it in thi

[no subject]

Someone (I think) was requesting information about COBOL & SQL. I saw this from IBM and it may/may not help you.Best practices for System z softwareIt's the beauty of SQL: You can code it in many ways and still get the same results. But depending on your technique, including how you structure it

[no subject]

Paul Gilmartin writes: For pure division-method, surely. Modulo 64 merely extracts the rightmost 6 bits of the original string. But you had suggested CKSUM, then modulo. And if CKSUM is of high quality, I'd expect any modulus to give good results. This response may well reflect Mr. Gilmarti

[no subject]

True, and if you use encryption device, like an accelerator, the overhead is minimal as well... ITschak On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Phil Smith wrote: > Itschak Mugzach wrote: > >They might entered late on z/os, but they are pure Java: No CPU cost if > you > >have zAAP, so they are far away

[no subject]

Itschak Mugzach wrote: >They might entered late on z/os, but they are pure Java: No CPU cost if you >have zAAP, so they are far away from older solutions running on z/os and >make use of a CP and influence TCO. I've seen few sites that stepped back >from datamasking projects when they discovered th

[no subject]

Timothy, Don't take it personally. May be they are in top 5. I don't care. This is a fact that I can't recall where I've seen. A Gartner/Forrester customer can get an analyst to speak with and find out himself. They might entered late on z/os, but they are pure Java: No CPU cost if you have zAAP,

[no subject]

Itschak Mugzach writes: >And you have Camouflage (datamasking.com) , 1st on Gartner and forrester. Maybe. Camouflage is very late to the z/OS party (but much better late than never, of course): http://www.datamasking.com/pressreleases.aspx?id=44 Gartner has a "magic quadrant" reporting methodolo

[no subject]

Wouldn't it be interesting if IBM could do something like this: http://www.serverwatch.com/news/article.php/3877861/IBM-Adopts-Novells-Linux-OS-for-Lotus-Websphere-Appliances.htm . for z/OS? Or am I going insane again? Would it be useful to run multiple z/OS "appliances" as separate images a pa

[no subject]

From: Ron Hawkins To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Tue, April 13, 2010 3:58:22 AM Subject: Ed, My "perceived" observation is that varying devices and paths in z/OS takes much longer and uses more resources than it did many moons ago under ESA, XA or SP2. It's my u

[no subject]

In <135331393-1271025860-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-19192267...@bda026.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>, on 04/11/2010 at 10:44 PM, Ted MacNEIL said: >The cry of the coward. Nonsense; you clearly don't understand the difference between courage and recklessness. As he told you, his reaso

[no subject]

Ed, My "perceived" observation is that varying devices and paths in z/OS takes much longer and uses more resources than it did many moons ago under ESA, XA or SP2. It's my understanding that a lot of device validation that used to occur at IPL when a device was discovered now occurs when the devic

[no subject]

From: Ron Hawkins To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Mon, April 12, 2010 10:46:05 AM Subject: Alan, I regularly bring 100s of volumes offline and online and have not seen this problem. I submit the jobs in the same way as you do. The only difference is I usually hav

[no subject]

Alan, In OS/390 V2.9 (I think) IBM provided an mvs command called CMDS. It can display or remove various types of MVS commands from the queue. You might want to put a trigger in place to issue the CMDS SHOW when this job starts to see what all else might be going on. CMDS D or CMDS DISPLAY D

[no subject]

Alan, I regularly bring 100s of volumes offline and online and have not seen this problem. I submit the jobs in the same way as you do. The only difference is I usually have one command per LCU which makes it easier for me to eyeball my changes when I'm setting up tests. Ron > -Original Mess

[no subject]

We have a batch job that uses the COMMAND program to issue commands. One of the uses is to issue 580 V ,ONLINE commands. These are directed to one menber of a SYSPLEX (no ROUTE command involved). The user complains that sometimes some of the commands don't execute, as witnessed by a s

[no subject]

>>> On 4/11/2010 at 06:44 PM, Ted MacNEIL wrote: > The cry of the coward. > You have to be willing to stand up and be counted, or your comments are just > noise. Up until now I've shared your view that you get unfairly criticized on this list. Now I'm going to killfile you for this. Who's ca

[no subject]

You're assuming my GMail name isn't my real name. Not a safe assumption. The display name, the email account name, and the actual name are unrelated. So, you really are: zedgarhoo...@gmail.com I doubt it! We don't even know if you're really Ted, now do we? No you don't, but I'm not hiding anyt

[no subject]

I'm hoping someone else has gone through this exercise. We have STK 9840s emulating 3490s. We are about to install 9840Ds and migrate our HSM Backups and ML2 data from 9840As to 9840Ds. We currently have 2200 specified for our 9840As TAPEUTILIZATION(UNITTYPE(3490) PERCENTFULL(2200)) What is t

Re: (no subject) maybe Entering command via JES

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Schwarz, Barry A Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 1:39 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: (no subject) maybe Entering command via JES JES2 or JES3? $HASP690 -- JES2 Does the

Re: (no subject) maybe Entering command via JES

JES2 or JES3? Does the jobclass have the appropriate authority via the COMMAND= operand? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of ??? ??? Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 12:23 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: hi, I'm running a

[no subject]

hi, I'm running a procedure which preform a jes command through a console. i gave a racf permission (opercmds,console) to the user running this procedure and still get this masseges: $HASP690 COMMAND REJECTED - SOURCE OF COMMAND HAS IMPROPER AUTHORITY any idea? ---

[no subject]

Query IBMMAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

[no subject]

http://sites.google.com/site/hmslcrygfx/ppnbcft4yj -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://ba

[no subject]

W dniu 2010-01-28 14:30, Mark Pace pisze: What is this, the 3rd such spam email? I think Jospeh should be removed until he can get control of his email and rejoin. Yes, something should be done. However it is possible that Joseph is as guilty as you, it is possible that his address was chosen

[no subject]

What is this, the 3rd such spam email? I think Jospeh should be removed until he can get control of his email and rejoin. On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Joseph Poon wrote: > http://sites.google.com/site/vx37sga2/dvep3f > _ > Hotm

[no subject]

http://sites.google.com/site/vx37sga2/dvep3f _ Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390708/direct/01/

[no subject]

http://sites.google.com/site/bjftrshrjed/aaag4l _ Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390707/direct/01/ -

[no subject]

As many have surmised, I did not intentionally send out anything of this nature. The Yahoo email account is my personal account and it appears as though something has been compromised. I have no clue as to how this happened, but will attempt to find out in order to prevent a reoccurrence. I wo

[no subject]

In , on 01/22/2010 at 02:14 PM, "McKown, John" said: >Faking an email address is fairly simple. Well, at least if the receiver >doesn't look too deeply at the headers. It's trivial even if the receiver *does* look at the header. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO p

[no subject]

In <4b59ffe4.3080...@queensu.ca>, on 01/22/2010 at 02:43 PM, Lorne Dudley said: >Can we have richard...@yahoo.com removed from the list. We don't need >the Viagra commercials on this list. I doubt that the message is from him, although it's possible that his machine has been compromised.

[no subject]

In <65f7ba9f100100k7ddc91cdgda47b8ed8f651...@mail.gmail.com>, on 01/22/2010 at 10:00 PM, shai hess said: >I am happy to hear that nobody in this forum need Viagra. There may be many people on this list who need Viagra©; that doesn't mean that anybody on this list needs an advertisement fo

[no subject]

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Don Williams wrote: > You're not the only one to interpret it as "non-trivial". No longer > confused. Yeah, my bad. Stupid language! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruct

[no subject]

You're not the only one to interpret it as "non-trivial". No longer confused. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 3:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Ah! I intepreted "beyond t

[no subject]

>>Can we have richard...@yahoo.com removed from the list. We don't need the >>Viagra commercials on this list. I am happy to hear that nobody in this forum need Viagra. God bless MF users. On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Rick Fochtman wrote: >

[no subject]

Can we have richard...@yahoo.com removed from the list. We don't need the Viagra commercials on this list. Careful, he may be a legit member whose machine has been compromised, or just whose address was faked. Faking an email address i

[no subject]

>I don't know about you guys, but his viagra link has saved my 4-day old marriage. Whew. TMI! And, why: 1. Do we care? 2. Are you telling us this? - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archiv

[no subject]

I don't know about you guys, but his viagra link has saved my 4-day old marriage. Whew. On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM, P S wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:26 PM, McKown, John > wrote: > > Ah! I intepreted "beyond trivial" as "not trivial" as the direction of > travel was not specified. M

[no subject]

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:26 PM, McKown, John wrote: > Ah! I intepreted "beyond trivial" as "not trivial" as the direction of travel > was not specified. My bad. Ah indeed...you're right, of course, it was ambiguous. Not to ME, but to anyone else! ---

[no subject]

Ah! I intepreted "beyond trivial" as "not trivial" as the direction of travel was not specified. My bad. -- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell john.mck...

[no subject]

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:14 PM, McKown, John wrote: > Faking an email address is fairly simple. Well, at least if the receiver > doesn't look too deeply at the headers. I even know how to do it with > sendmail. "I believe I said that, Captain." -- Mr. Spock Don't need sendmail -- telnet to po

[no subject]

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of P S > Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 1:47 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Lorne Dudley > wrote: > > Can we have richard...@yahoo.com rem

[no subject]

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Lorne Dudley wrote: > Can we have richard...@yahoo.com removed from the list.  We don't need the > Viagra commercials on this list. Careful, he may be a legit member whose machine has been compromised, or just whose address was faked. Faking an email address is be

[no subject]

Can we have richard...@yahoo.com removed from the list. We don't need the Viagra commercials on this list. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message:

[no subject]

http://sites.google.com/site/bcrslekljk/bpl0cff06d -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://ba

[no subject]

Paul Gilmartin wrote (of PL/I): | Do you mean that the specification of the language was | regressed? Astonishing! Indeed it was! It was for many years possible to write such things as write file() . . . event() ; . . . . . . write file() . . . event() ; . . . read file() . . .

[no subject]

INFO REFCARD -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

[no subject]

In <53f9fd7ef019734593da99911fa2496102083...@sxch205.kfbdom1.kyfb.pri>, on 07/16/2009 at 08:37 AM, "Klein, Kenneth" said: >Is that how this system variable is used No; you need two periods, since it swallows the first one. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO positio

Re: ISPF &ZSYSID Variable (Was NO SUBJECT)

s was answered sufficiently by others. That's what happens when I get the daily digest, and there's no subject on the OP... Art -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@ba

ISPF &ZSYSID Variable (Was NO SUBJECT)

On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:37:35 -0400, Klein, Kenneth wrote: >I want to change this line in a panel definition in our main ispplib: > >9,'CMD(EX ''SVS.IBMOM.SYSTS1.SCKMPARM(CKMISPF)'')' > >to one like this: > >9,'CMD(EX ''SVS.IBMOM.&ZSYSID.SCKMPARM(CKMISPF)'')' > >SYSTS1 is the name of our sandbox

[no subject]

I want to change this line in a panel definition in our main ispplib: 9,'CMD(EX ''SVS.IBMOM.SYSTS1.SCKMPARM(CKMISPF)'')' to one like this: 9,'CMD(EX ''SVS.IBMOM.&ZSYSID.SCKMPARM(CKMISPF)'')' SYSTS1 is the name of our sandbox lpar. I want to use this panel unchanged on the other lpars. I

[no subject]

Well, I did not know about that command option! Easy as that - did the job. Many thanks, Norbert! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Norbert Friemel Sent: 13 July 2009 10:52 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: non-SMS data

[no subject]

help -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

[no subject]

Better use a different one now Len Rugen -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Steffens Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 1:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: PW ADD Mahi40lb# --

[no subject]

PW ADD Mahi40lb# Chris Steffens Operating Systems Engineer Wells Fargo Financial MAC F4030-033 800 Walnut Street Des Moines, IA 50309-3636 Phone: 515-557-7098 Cell : 515-490-7563 Text Pager: (central Iowa only 5158490...@myairmail.com mailto:5158490...@myairmail.com> ) "This message may co

[no subject]

>> Thanks, but my bad. I need a PDF version, either via URL or an actual PDF. >> Although I prefer boo format, it's not for me. It's possible that the pub was never available in PDF. >> Bob Shannon It doesn't look like that particular edition has a PDF version. Other edition levels do though.

CICSPlex SM Tool REXX Function Package (was: No Subject)

On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:02:43 -0500, Jesse E Tilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The CICSPlex SM tool comes with a REXX function package; installation >documentation can be found online. >http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/cicsts/v3r2/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.cics.ts.installation.doc/topics/dfha

[no subject]

The CICSPlex SM tool comes with a REXX function package; installation documentation can be found online. http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/cicsts/v3r2/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.cics.ts.installation.doc/topics/dfha1ay.html A few colleagues and I have pored over this and can't decide if addi

[no subject]

Hi all, Can anyone provide me pdsm(partiotion dataset manager) document or link. Regards, Ram Balaji.S. (Dying Hard to explore MainFrames) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL

[no subject]

** The information contained in this communication is confidential, private, proprietary, or otherwise privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee. Unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received t

[no subject]

Could be that RMF is not started. Brian -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jacky Bright Sent: 23 October 2008 13:24 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: SDSF DA PANEL CPU/L 10/*** Since last few days observed that system SDSF DA pa

[no subject]

INFO REFCARD -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

[no subject]

Lizette, You would have to create IOEPRMxx and place any configuration parameters in it, but z/FS will work fine without it. I don't have an IOEPRMxx coded either. IOEAGFMT is in your SYS1.SIOELMOD library. You also need to mount the ZFS file system in BPXPRMxx like this: FILESYSTYPE T

[no subject]

I do something very similar in my batch trail using OPC/E. I keep 2 copies of /etc/syslog.conf, syslog.conf.a, syslog.conf.b, which contain log name versions ending in either in .a or .b: *.alert /dev/console auth.* /tmp/auth.log.a *.err /tmp

No subject

Subject:Linux on System z Performance Update- Apr 30 - Live Virtual Class For readers of IBMVM, Linux390, and IBMMAIN who are interested in Linux on System z Performance. Just a reminder that the next Linux on System z Live Virtual Class is on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 at 11:00 AM EDT US & Canada

[no subject]

TSO =3;4 for PROD.DISINH.D.* On command line enter SRCHFOR '' -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Allan Rasmussen Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 3:38 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Hi We have a requirement to searc

  1   2   >