A new low in e-mail disclaimers (Was Re: Z9 Upgrade)

2008-02-14 Thread Eric Chevalier
On 14 Feb 2008 07:32:35 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sarel Swanepoel) wrote: >NB: This email and its contents are subject to our email legal notice >which can be viewed at http://www.sars.gov.za/Email_Disclaimer.pdf Actually, Mr. Swanepoel didn't write that passage; either his e-mail client or some

Re: A new low in e-mail disclaimers (Was Re: Z9 Upgrade)

2008-02-14 Thread Rick Fochtman
- Actually, Mr. Swanepoel didn't write that passage; either his e-mail client or some upstream mail server inserted that warning. But a link to a _2-page_ disclaimer???!!! What has the world sunk to. :-( I guess we have the lawyers to thank for this new devel

Re: A new low in e-mail disclaimers (Was Re: Z9 Upgrade)

2008-02-14 Thread Chase, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman > > - > > >Actually, Mr. Swanepoel didn't write that passage; either his e-mail > >client or some upstream mail server inserted that warning. But a link > >to a _2-p

Re: A new low in e-mail disclaimers (Was Re: Z9 Upgrade)

2008-02-14 Thread Ed Gould
On Feb 14, 2008, at 1:59 PM, Rick Fochtman wrote: --SNIP--- Two biggest mistakes we ever made: letting doctors advertise and letting lawyers advertise. Can anyone in the US now watch TV without seeing at least 4 lawyers' ads in any hour?

Re: A new low in e-mail disclaimers (Was Re: Z9 Upgrade)

2008-02-15 Thread R.S.
Ed Gould wrote: On Feb 14, 2008, at 1:59 PM, Rick Fochtman wrote: --SNIP--- Two biggest mistakes we ever made: letting doctors advertise and letting lawyers advertise. Can anyone in the US now watch TV without seeing at least 4 lawyers' a

Re: A new low in e-mail disclaimers (Was Re: Z9 Upgrade)

2008-02-15 Thread Sarel Swanepoel
NB: This email and its contents are subject to our email legal notice which can be viewed at http://www.sars.gov.za/Email_Disclaimer.pdf Hi 100% right, it is our famous lawyers that came up with it and it gets added to our e-mail. >Actually, Mr. Swanepoel didn't write that passage; eit

Re: A new low in e-mail disclaimers (Was Re: Z9 Upgrade)

2008-02-15 Thread Ron MacRae
Just be greatfull it's a URL and the whole document is not in the email!! Ron. On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:44:20 +0200, Sarel Swanepoel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >NB: This email and its contents are subject to our email legal notice >which can be viewed at http://www.sars.gov.za/Email_Disclaimer.pd

Re: A new low in e-mail disclaimers (Was Re: Z9 Upgrade)

2008-02-15 Thread Ed Gould
On Feb 15, 2008, at 7:08 AM, Ron MacRae wrote: Just be greatfull it's a URL and the whole document is not in the email!! Ron. SNIP--- Probably it was tried and found out that it all went to bit bucket in the sky in the spam can:) Ed