AnyNet, dead or alive? (Was: Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 19 Sep 2010 to 20 Sep 2010 (#2010-263) - Was: z/OS, TCP/IP, and OSA)

2010-09-21 Thread Chris Mason
Allan AFAIK ANYNET is no longer supported. This is one of those points that is very easy to discover from the on-line manuals - just as the original question was, come to think of it - and, more recently a probably for which the exact opposite is a certainty. I may find sufficient energy

Re: Anynet

2009-07-14 Thread Chris Mason
APPN Network Node DLUR/DLUS Support for Local LU's DLUR/DLUS Support for Downstream LU's AnyNet SNA over TCP/IP Gateway AnyNet Sockets over SNA SNA API Clients Running APPC Applications SNA API Clients Running 3270 or other LUA Applications 3270/LUA Applications Focal Point AS/400 Shared Folders

Re: Anynet

2009-07-13 Thread Ward, Mike S
window that has various configurations that you can choose from. I.E. SNA GATEWAY APPN Network Node DLUR/DLUS Support for Local LU's DLUR/DLUS Support for Downstream LU's AnyNet SNA over TCP/IP Gateway AnyNet Sockets over SNA SNA API Clients Running APPC Applications SNA API Clients Running 3270

Re: Anynet

2009-07-08 Thread Chris Mason
Mike I was composing this response before your posts appeared on the IBMTCP-L list. ... is anynet incorporated into z/os vtam like enterprise extender is? Two of the AnyNet components, SNA over IP[1] and Sockets over SNA, *used* to be incorporated into VTAM (the Communications Server SNA

Anynet

2009-07-07 Thread Ward, Mike S
Hello all, is anynet incorporated into z/os vtam like enterprise extender is? Or is there any way to communicate with an SNA Gateway(Communications Server) from z/os 1.7 using the enterprise extender functions? Thanks. == This email and any files transmitted

Re: Anynet

2009-07-07 Thread Patrick O'Keefe
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:03:10 -0500, Ward, Mike S mw...@ssfcu.org wrote: Hello all, is anynet incorporated into z/os vtam like enterprise extender is? Or is there any way to communicate with an SNA Gateway(Communications Server) from z/os 1.7 using the enterprise extender functions? ANYNET

Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-28 Thread Patrick O'Keefe
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:44:30 -0500, Chris Mason chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote: ... [3] In principle this applies to APPN nodes also and could be used to argue that, just because a LEN or APPN node does not have a visible PU, it still has a PU and that the PU could be used to characterise the

Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-27 Thread Chris Mason
Pat Yes, I suspected that this peculiar TCP62 implementation could have distorted your vision of AnyNet SNA over IP. It would appear that TCP62 behaves as a LEN node with just one single logical link end-point implemented as the TCP (and UDP) sockets program following AnyNet SNA over IP

Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-26 Thread Chris Mason
Pat While true, there isn't much need for it, either. You're using the wrong tense; try was for is. In the days when AnyNet Sockets over SNA was created, the mid-90s, there was an golden opportunity not to scrap SNA network infrastructure in favour of IP network infrastructure but simply

Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-26 Thread Patrick O'Keefe
that on this list (and others). ... AnyNet SNA over IP constituted a Low Entry Networking (LEN) link just like any other LEN link, ... Actually, I didn't have any education (or training) on AnyNet. I just picked up some manuals and started cobbling together something that would allow a CICS to talk

Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-25 Thread Chris Mason
Jim Is there any replacement function for Anynet SNA over TCPIP. Jim Wangler's response was incorrect only in the last character. There is no need for a question mark. Enterprise Extender is the excuse to remove the AnyNet SNA over IP function. Regrettably there is no replacement

Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-25 Thread Patrick O'Keefe
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:53:46 -0500, Chris Mason chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote: ... Regrettably there is no replacement for the brilliant AnyNet Sockets over SNA function. While true, there isn't much need for it, either. It's rare to find 2 devices with SNA connectivity that don't have IP

anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-24 Thread Jim McAlpine
When configuring z/OS 1.9 I find that the VBUILD TYPE=TCP vtam definition no longer exists. Is there any replacement function for Anynet SNA over TCPIP. Jim McAlpine -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-24 Thread Jim Wangler
Enterprise Extender? Jim Wangler 214-502-6445 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 10:51 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: anynet SNA over TCPIP When configuring z/OS 1.9 I

Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-24 Thread Staller, Allan
AFAIK, Anynet is no longer supported. As of z/OS 1.8 See http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/e0z2m151.pdf pp 133-134 snip Subject: anynet SNA over TCPIP When configuring z/OS 1.9 I find that the VBUILD TYPE=TCP vtam definition no longer exists. Is there any replacement function

Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-24 Thread Ernie Takeuchi
the ability to connect IP. Ernie. When configuring z/OS 1.9 I find that the VBUILD TYPE=TCP vtam definition no longer exists. Is there any replacement function for Anynet SNA over TCPIP. Jim McAlpine