On 06/29/2010 10:08 AM, George Orwell wrote:
>> Our application programmers are not that familiar with z-architecture,
>> much less Assembly Language; but those of us in mainframe Technical
>> Support certainly are.
>
> Judging from the questions asked on this list, the above statement is
> certai
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:51:59 -0500, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
>>
>> Why does such a language need to be provided by IBM?
>> Can a third-party vendor provide it?
>>
>> - Dave Rivers -
>
>It would be unreasonable for IBM to require a third-party product to
>customize z/OS, or to expect IBM to help dia
Joel C. Ewing wrote:
On 06/28/2010 08:32 AM, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
Clark Morris wrote:
On 27 Jun 2010 07:30:35 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Until IBM provides a language or variant such as a systems flavor of
C/C++ that has access to all of the facilities (including the pecu
On 06/28/2010 08:32 AM, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> Clark Morris wrote:
>> On 27 Jun 2010 07:30:35 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>>
>> Until IBM provides a language or variant such as a systems flavor of
>> C/C++ that has access to all of the facilities (including the peculiar
>> link
Feel free to do an advert. Your stuff is good.
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:32:17 -0400 Thomas David Rivers
wrote:
:>Clark Morris wrote:
:>> On 27 Jun 2010 07:30:35 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
:>>
:>> Until IBM provides a language or variant such as a systems flavor of
:>> C/C++ that h
Clark Morris wrote:
On 27 Jun 2010 07:30:35 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Until IBM provides a language or variant such as a systems flavor of
C/C++ that has access to all of the facilities (including the peculiar
linking conventions for some JES exits, any management that does not
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
joa...@swbell.net (John McKown) writes:
> I think that there is a difference between having a "normal" (ain't no
> such beastie) application programmer and an "old
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 21:02 -0300, Clark Morris wrote:
> On 27 Jun 2010 15:20:32 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>
> >-
> >Until IBM provides a language or variant such as a systems flavor of
> >C/C++ that has access t
On 27 Jun 2010 15:20:32 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>-
>Until IBM provides a language or variant such as a systems flavor of
>C/C++ that has access to all of the facilities (including the peculiar
>linking convent
-
Until IBM provides a language or variant such as a systems flavor of
C/C++ that has access to all of the facilities (including the peculiar
linking conventions for some JES exits, any management that does not
keep access to a
On 27 Jun 2010 07:30:35 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>On 06/26/2010 09:16 PM, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
>>> But here we are talking about a case of manipulating directory entries
>>> and internal content of an Operating-system-specific construct, a PDS.
>
>>
>> I can do that with REXX and
11 matches
Mail list logo
