Lizette,
Perhaps someone is navigating to an automount directory with an
incorrect
MapName file? Depending on how/if your automount is set up that could
cause your
symptoms. Have you checked your /etc/auto.master and what it has
specified?
--
Gabe Tully
-
No, I have SYSPLEX(NO) coded.
Lizette
>
> Since nobody asked so far: You don't have SYSPLEX(YES) in
> your BPXPRMxx, do you?
>
> --
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama
Since nobody asked so far: You don't have SYSPLEX(YES) in
your BPXPRMxx, do you?
--
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the mess
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:30:59 -0500, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
>Mark,
>
>I have them defined in BPXPRMxx. They are all defined as RW. I have taken
>all defaults.
>
>So are you saying that unless needed all OMVS datasets should have R rather
>than RW when they are not being updated?
You don't have
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:28:44 -0500, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
>Basically these are system specific OMVS data sets. They would not be
>mounted on any other system because that system already has these files. I
>will look at UNMOUNT, however, there is no one trying to move these files.
>It looks to
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:22:54 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L
wrote:
>If that is your scenario then you should be using 'unmount' for the
>automove parameter. Noautomove can still leave entries in the global
>mount table for these filesystems even though the system is down. That
>is usually not a big issue
Jon L. Veilleux
veilleu...@aetna.com
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 9:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Automove vs Noautomove in BPXPRMxx
I
I have two BPXPRMxx members. One is system wide, the second it system
specific.
Because we define these files with SYS1.OMVS.JV390.&SYSNAME we elected to
put them in BPXPRM00. This contains the generic names along with the BPX
options.
When we have a unix file that is system specific, we code
re
defined with 'unmount'.
Jon L. Veilleux
veilleu...@aetna.com
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 8:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Au
Mark,
I have them defined in BPXPRMxx. They are all defined as RW. I have taken
all defaults.
So are you saying that unless needed all OMVS datasets should have R rather
than RW when they are not being updated?
Does this account for the operating system thinking it needs to automount or
autom
Basically these are system specific OMVS data sets. They would not be
mounted on any other system because that system already has these files. I
will look at UNMOUNT, however, there is no one trying to move these files.
It looks to me to be the system trying to do this. I get an IGW026I
indicati
: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Automove vs Noautomove in BPXPRMxx
I have th 5 lpars. Each one has its own set of OMVS datasets.
For example Lpar1 has SYS1.OMVS.ROOT.LPAR1, SYS1.OMVS.JV390.LPAR1,
SYS1.OMVS.SGIYROOT.LPAR1 and so on.
Lpar2 has a duplicate set of files that end with LPAR2 rather LPAR1 An
How / why is LPAR2 trying to mount LPAR1's files? Do you have them defined in
BPXPRMxx? That is allowed if they are mounted read only on both LPARs
(which would create a SHR ENQ in SYSZDSN and not EXCL). Or is someone
manually trying to mount them?
If they are "cross defined" as R/W, then it'
I have th 5 lpars. Each one has its own set of OMVS datasets.
For example Lpar1 has SYS1.OMVS.ROOT.LPAR1, SYS1.OMVS.JV390.LPAR1,
SYS1.OMVS.SGIYROOT.LPAR1 and so on.
Lpar2 has a duplicate set of files that end with LPAR2 rather LPAR1
And so forth.
I see in syslog that the LPAR2 gets an IGW026I m
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:20:11 -0500, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
>I have read the manuals but I am still not clear on the use of automove vs.
noautomove.
>
>My Unix envrionment on z/OS V1.9 is one system/one set of UNIX files. So,
yes, I have a lot of duplicated files.
>
>However, from time to time I
. Veilleux
veilleu...@aetna.com
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Automove vs Noautomove in BPXPRMxx
I have read the
I have read the manuals but I am still not clear on the use of automove vs.
noautomove.
My Unix envrionment on z/OS V1.9 is one system/one set of UNIX files. So, yes,
I have a lot of duplicated files.
However, from time to time I notice I will see the following message in SYSLOG
IGW026I HFS F
17 matches
Mail list logo
