Lizette Koehler wrote:
Thanks for all the ideas. I was hoping for something a little more TSO
oriented where the end user would only see the count of the file. By doing
strictly batch they would need to know JCL and where to look for the output.
Most of the people that will be using that
I have about a billion ways - well not quite - to count records in a data set.
I am looking for advise as to what would be the most efficient way to run
either under TSO or BATCH.
We do have FILEAID and a couple of other tools. We are z/OS V1.7.
I want to just find out the total number of
Lizette
Cant think of anything which 'counts' records quicker than DFSORT
James F. Smith
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: 26 April 2007 20:36
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Better way to count records
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 7:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Better way to count records
I have about a billion ways - well not quite - to count records in a
data set
to count records
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 7:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Better way to count records
I have about a billion ways - well not quite - to count records
On Thursday 26 April 2007 08:40, james wrote:
Lizette
Cant think of anything which 'counts' records quicker than DFSORT
James F. Smith
I agree. Sort copy to a dummy output file should work fine.
--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
-
How we behave
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:36:15 -0400, Lizette Koehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have about a billion ways - well not quite - to count records in a data set.
I am looking for advice as to what would be the most efficient way to run
either under TSO or BATCH.
We do have FILEAID and a couple of
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:58:36 -0400, Mark Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thursday 26 April 2007 08:40, james wrote:
Lizette
Cant think of anything which 'counts' records quicker than DFSORT
James F. Smith
I agree. Sort copy to a dummy output file should work fine.
--
//COUNT EXEC
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:04:06 -0400, Lizette Koehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all the ideas. I was hoping for something a little more TSO
oriented where the end user would only see the count of the file. By doing
strictly batch they would need to know JCL and where to look for the
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 7:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Better way to count records
We are trying to determine if the space allocation is efficient for
these files. There has been a lot of copying of JCL over the years and
we feel
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:04:06 -0400 Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Thanks for all the ideas. I was hoping for something a little more TSO
:oriented where the end user would only see the count of the file. By doing
:strictly batch they would need to know JCL and where to look for the
I usually do that with icetool
Walter Trovijo Jr.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 6:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Better way to count records
Thanks for all the ideas. I was hoping for something a little more TSO
oriented
13 matches
Mail list logo
