[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, re "all/wombat/|/xyzzy/":
>Almost correct. You have one surplus word, the "and".
>The All string "all/wombat/|/xyzzy/" asks for "wombat" OR "xxzzy"
>If you want "wombat" AND "xxzzy", feed it "all/wombat/&/xyzzy/".
No, "all/wombat|xyzzy/" will, as Chris wrote, find all l
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:59:36 -0500, Arthur T. wrote:
>Most of what I know of XEDIT is from my use of
>KEDIT. Doesn't XEDIT have the MORE command?
Apologies if this has been answered 27 times already (I get the list digested):
No, MORE is not part of what's provided with XEDIT. As others have no
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
[...]
> Use "all/wombat/|/xyzzy/" to display lines with "wombat" and/or
>"xyzzy"
> then "shad off" to hide the "x line(s) not displayed" lines
Almost correct. You have one surplus word, the "and".
The All string "all/wombat/|/xyzzy/" asks f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
[...]
What I meant is that XEDIT has no sequence as simple as:
EXCLUDE ALL
FIND wombat ALL
Not correct. All does just that. "ALL /wombat/"
... looking at the display, I decide I want to see additional
li
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
[...]
> Most of what I know of XEDIT is from my use of
>KEDIT. Doesn't XEDIT have the MORE command?
No.
--
Rich Greenberg N Ft Myers, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 239 543 1353
Eastern time. N6LRT I speak for myself & my dogs only.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
[...]
>What I meant is that XEDIT has no sequence as simple as:
>
>EXCLUDE ALL
>FIND wombat ALL
Not correct. All does just that. "ALL /wombat/"
>... looking at the display, I decide I want to see additional
>lines, so I:
>
>FIND xyzzy ALL
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:59:36 -0500, Arthur T. wrote:
>
> Most of what I know of XEDIT is from my use of
>KEDIT. Doesn't XEDIT have the MORE command?
>
Not to my knowledge. But most of what I know of XEDIT is
far outdated. As I say, I once coded the function as a
macro; XEDIT exposes the nec
On 16 Dec 2007 14:17:37 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Gilmartin) wrote:
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:37:24 -0500, rich wrote:
But ISPF is easier than XEDIT at adding lines to the
viewable
set; in XEDIT you need to write a macro to do tha
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:37:24 -0500, rich wrote:
>
>>But ISPF is easier than XEDIT at adding lines to the viewable
>>set; in XEDIT you need to write a macro to do that.
>
>Not necessarily. If you xedited a file which is still out on disk, you
>can get the complete file back by:
>ALL
>:0 DELETE *
>g
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 11:06:28 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
>
>>I do an
>>ALL /string/
>>macro to get the lines I want.
>>
>>How do I delete the other lines so that I can save a file with just those
>>line?
>>
>(IIRC -- Please RTFM before maiming your f
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 11:06:28 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
>I do an
>ALL /string/
>macro to get the lines I want.
>
>How do I delete the other lines so that I can save a file with just those
>line?
>
(IIRC -- Please RTFM before maiming your file on my say-so):
SET DISPLAY 0 0
SET SCOPE DISPLA
ussion List
16/12/2007 09:06
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
CMS PEEK command - how to delete all SHADOW lines
I do an
ALL /string/
macro to get the lines I want.
How do I delete the other lines so that I can save a file with just
I do an
ALL /string/
macro to get the lines I want.
How do I delete the other lines so that I can save a file with just those
line?
Similar to ISPF
X ALL
F 'string' ALL
DEL ALL X
--
Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar
13 matches
Mail list logo
