At 10:07 +0530 on 08/03/2005, sreekanth dumpa wrote about Copying GDG
versions in Reverse order:
Hi,
I have taken dump of GDG by using base into flat file using IEBGENER
Utility. In flat file it is copying the latest version first and the old
Versions next. But I want to copy them in reverse
I checked this last night. There was no requirement of this nature
transferred from GUIDE to SHARE. So, a new requirement might me in
order. All of the GUIDE storage requirements were subject to 2 separate
reviews by the MVS Storage Management requirements committee. The
majority of the old GUI
On Aug 3, 2005, at 4:14 PM, Mark Thomen wrote:
"Ed Gould" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
Mark,
Does this mean that all outstanding GUIDE requirements were purged? I
thought they were merged into the SHARE requirements database, no?
Our requirements guy chec
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 08/03/2005
at 10:36 AM, Martin Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Ask the IBM people who handle that sort of thing.
He *is* one of the IBM people who handle that sort of thing. I took
his question as a hint to submit a requirement, with a business case,
if you want the
"Ed Gould" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Mark,
>
> Does this mean that all outstanding GUIDE requirements were purged? I
> thought they were merged into the SHARE requirements database, no?
Our requirements guy checked again, and there appear to be no GUIDE
re
On Aug 3, 2005, at 1:46 PM, Mark Thomen wrote:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:...
Just out of curiosity - has anyone ever submitted
a marketing requirement for this function?
Ask the IBM people who handle that sort of thing.
Actually, I did - before I posted my question. And the
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ury.com>...
> Mark T. said:
>
> > If someone would like to submit a requirement like this at SHARE
> > I will try to apply some weight to get it implemented.
>
> Would someone who is going to SHARE please look into this?
>
All (well a
Mark T. said:
> If someone would like to submit a requirement like this at SHARE
> I will try to apply some weight to get it implemented.
Would someone who is going to SHARE please look into this?
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic transmission (including any
accompanying attachments) is
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:...
> > Just out of curiosity - has anyone ever submitted
> > a marketing requirement for this function?
>
> Ask the IBM people who handle that sort of thing.
Actually, I did - before I posted my question. And the answer was there is
no requirement on the
On Aug 3, 2005, at 10:25 AM, Mark Thomen wrote:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:...
Whatever, its a BIG waste of time to have to
shuffle
all of the generations into the natural sequence. IBM refuses to
address
this issue
because "it's too risky", "We have better things to do", "Ther
>I believe Mark Thomen "IS" one of those people at IBM that handle these sort
of things..
Yes, but.
This forum is not the place to get these sort of things handled.
Regardless of who the Guru is, and even if your requirement is valid, it's not
going to be handled unless you go through proper cha
> I believe Mark Thomen "IS" one of those people at IBM that handle
> these sort of things...
My apologies to Mark. I believe catalog processing and IDCAMS lists show
generations in their natural sequence. This seemed more like an
initiator/allocation problem.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This elect
opying GDG versions in Reverse order
> Just out of curiosity - has anyone ever submitted a marketing
> requirement for this function?
Ask the IBM people who handle that sort of thing.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic transmission (including any
accompanying attachments) is intende
> Just out of curiosity - has anyone ever submitted
> a marketing requirement for this function?
Ask the IBM people who handle that sort of thing.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic transmission (including any
accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its authorized
recipient(s), an
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:...
>Whatever, its a BIG waste of time to have to
> shuffle
> all of the generations into the natural sequence. IBM refuses to address
> this issue
> because "it's too risky", "We have better things to do", "There's no
need",
> blah, blah,
> blah.
Just out
>I have taken dump of GDG by using base into flat file using IEBGENER
>Utility. In flat file it is copying the latest version first and the old
>Versions next. But I want to copy them in reverse order. i.e. old version
>First and later version next.
The issue has been discussed several times in th
There is a program on the CBT web site called GDGCOPY in file 482. It
copies GDGs starting with the oldest generation to the newest.
Eric Bielefeld
P&H Mining Equipment
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 10:07:33 +0530, sreekanth dumpa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have taken dump of GDG by using base i
Hi,
I have taken dump of GDG by using base into flat file using IEBGENER
Utility. In flat file it is copying the latest version first and the old
Versions next. But I want to copy them in reverse order. i.e. old version
First and later version next. Here is example of the problem
Input GDG:
First
18 matches
Mail list logo
