Re: HLASM Macro Call Question

2006-08-28 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08/25/2006 at 05:33 PM, John R. Ehrman (408-463-3543 T/543-) [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: John Ehrman There was a subthread on the issue of whether such questions should be posted here or only on ASSEMBLER-L. What is your position? Thanks. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.)

Re: HLASM Macro Call Question

2006-08-28 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John R. Ehrman (408-463-3543 T/543-) Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 7:34 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HLASM Macro Call Question There's no need to do your own parsing -- as Steve Smith (I think it was) suggested, check the AINSERT statement

Re: HLASM Macro Call Question

2006-08-28 Thread Craddock, Chris
The problem with AINSERT from what I currently understand (and we need to take this to the ASM LIST, which I will complete doing this evening), the card image must be built so that you have a non-blank that will show up in CC72. Otherwise all your data that will be substituted will get

Re: HLASM Macro Call Question

2006-08-25 Thread John R. Ehrman (408-463-3543 T/543-)
There's no need to do your own parsing -- as Steve Smith (I think it was) suggested, check the AINSERT statement: it was designed for exactly this kind of situation. Also, the NOCOMPAT(SYSLIST) option sometimes helps for substituted operands that are a list (like (A,B,C)), but won't help for

Re: HLASM Macro Call Question

2006-08-24 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08/23/2006 at 05:08 PM, Jeffrey D. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Your question belongs in the ASSEMBLER list group. This is a legitiamte list for the guestion, and it probably has more eyeballs. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position;

Re: HLASM Macro Call Question

2006-08-24 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08/23/2006 at 07:03 PM, Thompson, Steve (SCI TW) [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I need a bit of IEBEYEBALL by some of you heavy weight MACRO writers. You need to provide a bit more context. Please do a cut paste from the actual listing, showing where you set the LCLC, where

Re: HLASM Macro Call Question

2006-08-24 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 7:10 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HLASM Macro Call Question snip You need to provide a bit more context. Please do a cut

Re: HLASM macro call question

2006-08-24 Thread john gilmore
From the current (V1R5) HLASM Language Reference manual, SC26-4940-04: COMPAT(NOSYSLIST), abbreviation CPAT(NOSYSL) instructs the assembler not to treat sublists in SETC symbols as character strings, when passed to a macro definition in an operand of a macro instruction. Seymour's contrary

Re: HLASM macro call question

2006-08-24 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of john gilmore Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:30 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HLASM macro call question SNIP Seymour's contrary view noted, this thread nevertheless belongs

Re: HLASM macro-call question (assembler list)

2006-08-24 Thread john gilmore
Yes, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Two of its chief merits are o the quality of its contributors, although there is significant overlap with IBM_MAIN, and o the fact that John Ehrman, who owns the HLASM, and his (remote Australian) development team are active participants. John Gilmore Ashland,

Re: HLASM macro call question

2006-08-24 Thread Ray Mullins
] On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve (SCI TW) Sent: Thursday 24 August 2006 07:39 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HLASM macro call question knowledge SETB 0 where_at SETC 'LOC' MNOTE 16,'Caller has knowledge of Assembler list' MNOTE 0,'LOC must be specified

Re: HLASM macro call question

2006-08-24 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Mullins Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 10:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HLASM macro call question MNOTE 'Send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' MNOTE 'SUBSCRIBE

Re: HLASM Macro Call Question

2006-08-24 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08/24/2006 at 09:52 AM, Thompson, Steve (SCI TW) [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I am afraid that the problem is what I suspected, and what another poster suggested, that this (COND) is handed to the IF macro as a string and not a parse-able line of text HLA parses the

Re: HLASM macro-call question (assembler list)

2006-08-24 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08/24/2006 at 02:51 PM, john gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: o the fact that John Ehrman, who owns the HLASM, and his (remote Australian) development team are active participants. AFAIK he is also subscribed here. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT

Re: HLASM macro-call question (assembler list)

2006-08-24 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 8/24/2006 2:06:03 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: AFAIK he is also subscribed here. But doesn't post very regularly(anymore). -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

HLASM Macro Call Question

2006-08-23 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
I need a bit of IEBEYEBALL by some of you heavy weight MACRO writers. I've been working on a set of macros for about 4 days and now I'm just too close to the bark to see the tree. Specifically, I have been working on a tool for handling an issue and ran into this problem. Now I remember that

Re: HLASM Macro Call Question

2006-08-23 Thread Jeffrey D. Smith
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve (SCI TW) Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 5:04 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: HLASM Macro Call Question I need a bit of IEBEYEBALL by some of you heavy weight MACRO