Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-18 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/10/2007 at 02:59 PM, Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Here again, I have similar experiences with medics. When I got bitten by a cottonmouth at Ft. Polk, the medic-types were worse than useless, but the guy that saved my b*tt in 'Nam after I was stung by a

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-18 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/10/2007 at 02:24 PM, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: The President of the United States get, what, a $400,000 annual salary? And a tenure limited by the Constitution to 8 years maximum. And quite a variety of perq for the rest of his life. Explain that! Power

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-18 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/10/2007 at 12:43 PM, Veilleux, Jon L [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: No, there wasn't any disciplinary action. Also, during my year over there 2 people were killed by accidental firearm discharges. See any correlation? None that wasn't predictable :-( -- Shmuel

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-11 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Gould [ snip ] I think I had similar experience. I had pneumonia and they made me walk to the hospital which was about 2 miles away. The sergeant got court martialed (sp?) I believe for making me walk

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-11 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 5/11/2007 7:30:28 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Interesting that one of our premier IBM-bashers felt safer in a place that runs IBM computers. Our regional Hospital had a terrible outage with their dual AS/400's(and of course no backup) and

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-11 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 5/11/2007 9:43:18 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A triple bypass is elective surgery? Think it was one of those 'you probably need angioplasty' and was scheduled and suddenly started having chest pains and just went downhill...six or seven

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-11 Thread Kirk Talman
A triple bypass is elective surgery? IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 05/11/2007 09:45:26 AM: Our regional Hospital had a terrible outage with their dual AS/400's(and of course no backup) and decided to convert. Well all the IBMer's who were planning elective

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-11 Thread Ed Gould
On May 11, 2007, at 7:30 AM, Chase, John wrote: -SNIP Interesting that one of our premier IBM-bashers felt safer in a place that runs IBM computers. :-D John: I am flattered to think you think I am an IBM basher. I believe I am a person who calls a duck a

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-10 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/08/2007 at 07:10 AM, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: If you punish success, who will take the risks? How is punishing success worse than rewarding failure, which is what we currently do for high-profile CEO's? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-10 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/08/2007 at 09:04 AM, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Why would you, as a stockholder, want to hire somebody you *know* will leave you broke? The BOD doesn't consult with the stockholders when selecting a CEO. Stockholder suits asking for a more direct roles in

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-10 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/08/2007 at 09:08 PM, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Oh, yeas, there are such regulators! In your imagination. Invented by Marx, Engels, implemented by Lenin, tuned by Stalin. Get your red herrings while they're fresh. Been there. Where you've been has nothing to

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-10 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/09/2007 at 11:43 AM, Dave Kopischke [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: The Elites I'm talking about are the fictitious few who would decide on who gets what in the context of the post I was replying to. The elites that should decide such matters are the stockholders. Board

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-10 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/09/2007 at 09:09 PM, Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I am not sure I agree with you at all on this one. Of course I look at it a little differently than a typical GI. My bosses were GS12's 13's and 14's and I think I had a GS 15 who was their boss. My limited

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-10 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/09/2007 at 03:13 PM, Veilleux, Jon L [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Interesting! I had a similar experience my second day in that 'tropical climate'. Someone was cleaning a machine gun on the table across from me and almost shot my guts out when he pulled the trigger

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-10 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
snip When I was in basic, cleaning a firearm without examining it properly to ensure that it was fully unloaded would have gotten me a boot in my behind. Doing it on the range would have gotten me an Article 15 at best. Was there any disciplinary action in your case? /snip No, there wasn't any

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-10 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) [ snip ] Effects: In Albania salary of minister was 2.5 times larger than cleaning lady. ROTF,LMAO! The nominal salary and the real salary were quite different. Party bosses lived

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-10 Thread Mark Jacobs
Chase, John wrote: -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) [ snip ] Effects: In Albania salary of minister was 2.5 times larger than cleaning lady. ROTF,LMAO! The nominal salary and the real salary were quite

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-10 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 5/10/2007 2:24:36 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Explain that! P O W E R! ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. -- For IBM-MAIN

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-10 Thread Rick Fochtman
---snip--- The civil servants, NCO's, officers and warrant officers that I encountered *after* training were mostly competent, although the paramedics in basic training almost killed me by not allowing me to see a doctor when I had pneumonia[1]. One

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-10 Thread Ed Gould
On May 10, 2007, at 6:54 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: -- SNIP [1] I'm not sure that I had pneumonia the first time that I went on sick call, but when I collapsed after two weeks of APC they

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-09 Thread Bill Johnson
The problem with CEO compensation is twofold. It is not based on company performance as witnessed by Robert Nardelli at Home Depot who got a nice 210 million dollar going away present for performance so bad that investors lost money during his reign. Secondly, boards of directors, specifically

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-09 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
SNIP And why pick on CEOs ??? You should be going after anyone who earns more than the amount the elites decide is too much and probably anyone who earns less than the amount the elites decide is too little. Wouldn't that be fair ??? Or maybe that would be too fair ??? /snip What elites are you

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-09 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Wed, 9 May 2007 07:26:34 -0400, Veilleux, Jon L wrote: What elites are you talking about? Is that a synonym for 'liberal'??? The ones who decide on CEO compensation now are mostly CEOs from other companies who are on the boards of directors of multiple companies. I know you're not talking

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-09 Thread Rick Fochtman
I went the other way in the Army, finding myself in a tropical climate where the main diet was rice, with a few vegetables and maybe a water buffalo, when the gunner forgot to clear the M2-HB before attempting to clean it. In my (somewhat limited) experience, the officers were there to get

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-09 Thread Anne Lynn Wheeler
ran the Army while the officers fought the battles and collected the medals. Needless to say, I have a very low opinion of high-flying leaders that don't share the hardships of those who are led. re: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007j.html#61 Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-09 Thread Kirk Talman
My son is sgt in iraq at moment (4th tour of duty in ME). Other than diet and humidity, little has changed. he is battle nco running a unit. when battle captain is not there, he has to do that job in addition to his own. before deploy, he had a mandatory training mission. he had to

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-09 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Wed, 9 May 2007 14:43:46 -0400, Kirk Talman wrote: My son is sgt in iraq at moment (4th tour of duty in ME). Other than diet and humidity, little has changed. he is battle nco running a unit. when battle captain is not there, he has to do that job in addition to his own. before deploy, he

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-09 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
snip I went the other way in the Army, finding myself in a tropical climate where the main diet was rice, with a few vegetables and maybe a water buffalo, when the gunner forgot to clear the M2-HB before attempting to clean it. /snip Interesting! I had a similar experience my second day in that

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-09 Thread Ed Gould
On May 9, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Rick Fochtman wrote: I went the other way in the Army, finding myself in a tropical climate where the main diet was rice, with a few vegetables and maybe a water buffalo, when the gunner forgot to clear the M2-HB before attempting to clean it. In my (somewhat

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman snip-- Not all the people will suffer. The CEO's will rake in even more money. first response We

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice exactly, we need to cut ceo compensation by 90% in this country, and in some cases, like the one idiot that got almost 400 million, by 99%. Perhaps we should consider dumbing ourselves down to the

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Mark Jacobs
Chase, John wrote: -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman snip-- Not all the people will suffer. The CEO's will rake in even more money. first

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
snip If you punish success, who will take the risks? /snip CEO's don't face the risks for their failures. Their pay and benefits are guaranteed. In my experience it is the employees (through lower pay, lost benefits, and/or lost jobs) and the stockholders who pay the price for CEO failure. A

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of [various] CEO's don't face the risks for their failures. Their pay and benefits are guaranteed. If they don't face risks, how/why do they get guarantees like that? What, exactly, does a CEO do to warrant their

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Howard Brazee
On 7 May 2007 19:06:18 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rick Fochtman) wrote: We should start by offshoring the CEO's ;-) unsnip Then raise their taxes such that the more they make, the less they get to keep. So the CEOs get offshored where they

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Robert Justice
How much do *you* think a CEO is worth? most of them, not even worth five cents. However, for the few (and I do mean few) good ones, no more than a couple of million dollars, tops. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Howard Brazee
On 8 May 2007 09:28:38 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Justice) wrote: How much do *you* think a CEO is worth? most of them, not even worth five cents. However, for the few (and I do mean few) good ones, no more than a couple of million dollars, tops. What process should stockholders use to

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Edward Jaffe
Robert Justice wrote: exactly, we need to cut ceo compensation by 90% in this country, and in some cases, like the one idiot that got almost 400 million, by 99%. Huh?? Lee Raymond was certainly no idiot! In his 12 years as CEO he handled take-overs of -- among others -- Canada's Imperial Oil,

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Mark Jacobs
Edward Jaffe wrote: Robert Justice wrote: exactly, we need to cut ceo compensation by 90% in this country, and in some cases, like the one idiot that got almost 400 million, by 99%. Huh?? Lee Raymond was certainly no idiot! In his 12 years as CEO he handled take-overs of -- among others --

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Howard Brazee
On 8 May 2007 11:24:54 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward Jaffe) wrote: XOM shareholders overwhelmingly agree Mr. Raymond's accomplishments were worth every penny awarded him by the board -- literally a drop in the bucket when compared to the company's capitalization and quarterly dividend

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Edward Jaffe
Mark Jacobs wrote: One man/person doesn't do it all. Exxon/Mobil succeeded because of the efforts of all its employees not only the CEO. Exactly right! Employee morale under Mr. Raymond's leadership was *extremely* high! Such unprecedented corporate success requires true leadership and, by

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Schwarz, Barry A
Take it to a politics group please. Where is the list owner? -Original Message- XOM shareholders overwhelmingly agree Mr. Raymond's accomplishments were worth every penny awarded him by the board -- literally a drop in the bucket when compared to the company's capitalization and

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread R.S.
Howard Brazee wrote: On 8 May 2007 09:28:38 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Justice) wrote: How much do *you* think a CEO is worth? most of them, not even worth five cents. However, for the few (and I do mean few) good ones, no more than a couple of million dollars, tops. What process

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Edward Jaffe
Howard Brazee wrote: Would the stockholders have been better off by paying him either half that amount or twice that amount? Did some other company offer him $399,999.999.99 so they needed to pay him more to keep him? I doubt he ever considered working elsewhere. Raymond was a loyal

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
In a message dated 5/7/2007 10:19:08 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ... we need to cut ceo compensation by 90% in this country... Who is we and how do we do that? Pass a law? With or without 100 pages of fine print? Who enforces it? How do we keep him from

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Darren, Please kill this thread. Repetitive use of the delete key is giving us carpel tunnel. Somebody please kill this political thread. Bill Fairchild Plainfield, IL Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Chris Mason
] Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 9:08 PM Subject: Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM? Howard Brazee wrote: On 8 May 2007 09:28:38 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Justice) wrote: How much do *you* think a CEO is worth? most of them

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Mon, 7 May 2007 22:12:43 -0400, Robert Justice wrote: exactly, we need to cut ceo compensation by 90% in this country, and in some cases, like the one idiot that got almost 400 million, by 99%. I'd really like to be that stupid. For that kind of money, you can call me whatever names you

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Tue, 8 May 2007 21:08:26 +0200, R.S. wrote: Oh, yeas, there are such regulators! Invented by Marx, Engels, implemented by Lenin, tuned by Stalin. Been there. Wisdom from someone who's been where this thread is headed. Be careful of what you wish for.

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Matthew Stitt
You mean the amount of compensation Adolf Hitler was entitled to? That was easy to understand. Anything he wanted, no questions asked. G, D, R (From Darren) :-) On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:11:10 -0500, Dave Kopischke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 8 May 2007 21:08:26 +0200, R.S. wrote: Oh,

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Mike Liberatore
What Risks? They make a decision which is either good or bad? The input provided in making this decision is provided by subordinates. CEOs are simply paid to much. When someone in their company is looking to get a 3% percent raise they say we can't afford that Are you trying to put this

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Ed Gould
On May 8, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Chase, John wrote: --SNIP- It's always the privates who get shot, bombed, stabbed, burned, etc., while occasionally a general will get forced retirement but more often will acquire another command with another bunch of

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-08 Thread Anne Lynn Wheeler
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Gould) writes: John, I agree with you on this issue ... somewhat. I was in the Army (over in Germany) and our base was a 'stepping stone for generals. They

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-07 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
snip When we take the easy choice for short term protection, we're betraying my grandchildren's future.That's the nature of politics, but I value them more. /snip Short term and long term we need to make a level field. That involves making trade agreements that have a minimum set of

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-07 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/07/2007 at 08:42 AM, Howard Brazee [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Yes, the competition hurts me.But passing a law saying we can't have foreign partners is passing a law saying we can't have foreign customers. However, lowering barriers in one direction while retaining

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-07 Thread Rick Fochtman
snip-- Not all the people will suffer. The CEO's will rake in even more money. first response We should start by offshoring the CEO's ;-)

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-07 Thread Robert Justice
10:05 PM Subject: Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM? snip-- Not all the people will suffer. The CEO's will rake in even more money. first response We should start by offshoring

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-07 Thread Ed Gould
On May 7, 2007, at 9:05 PM, Rick Fochtman wrote: snip-- Not all the people will suffer. The CEO's will rake in even more money. first response We should start by offshoring the CEO's ;-)

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-07 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 5/7/2007 9:13:08 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: exactly, we need to cut ceo compensation by 90% in this country, and in some cases, like the one idiot that got almost 400 million, by 99%. Which one?

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-06 Thread Bill Wilkie
AMEN! Bill From: Robert Justice [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM? Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 20:15:55 -0400 I just wonder how long it's going to be before people finally

Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-04 Thread Mark Jacobs
Did anyone read this? http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070504_002027.html Mark Jacobs Time Customer Service -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-04 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Did anyone read this? Yes, and I've lived it! - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-04 Thread Robert Justice
I just wonder how long it's going to be before people finally WAKE UP in this country and quit putting up with the offshoring, the outsourcing, the free trade b.s, the H1B visa SCAM and completely idiotic ceo compensation. .

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-04 Thread Campbell Jay
When will we ditch Capitalism ? Kill us, Darren ! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Justice Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 8:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM? I just

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-04 Thread Robert Justice
capitalism is one thing, CORPORATE GREED AND CORPORATE STUPIDITY is something else entirely. - Original Message - From: Campbell Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 9:13 PM Subject: Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S

Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?

2007-05-04 Thread Campbell Jay
Different topic... Sorry -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Justice Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 9:23 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM? capitalism is one thing, CORPORATE