Hai Friends..
Is any Software Available to learn JCL and CICS like NET EXPRESS..?
plz Send me the Web Address
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the messag
A little more information would be helpful. Are you interested in learning
how to write JCL, or something else? For CICS, are you interested in
installation? Operations? Programming? In what language(s)? (CICS
Transaction Server supports C, C++, COBOL, PL/I, Java, EGL, etc.)
- - - - -
Timothy Sipp
I am not sure if there is CBTs that can teach JCL or CICS. However,
universities like Marist College do provide some web based education in
these areas.
What specifically are your requirements? Application programming? System
Programming? Student taking classes? Are you trying to get certifie
And yet another question to the original poster: what part of the world are
you in? As Lizette alludes to, there could be in-person training options
available in your part of the world, so perhaps that would be a good option
for you.
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Arc
Timothy Sipples wrote:
And yet another question to the original poster: what part of the world are
you in? As Lizette alludes to, there could be in-person training options
available in your part of the world, so perhaps that would be a good option
for you.
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
We offer a
Is there anything similar for MQ training ?
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Steve Comstock wrote:
> Timothy Sipples wrote:
>
>> And yet another question to the original poster: what part of the world
>> are
>> you in? As Lizette alludes to, there could be in-person training options
>> availab
Yogeetha balasubramanian wrote:
Is there anything similar for MQ training ?
You know, we don't have any MQ training.
(Are there any MQ training developers out there interested
in working with us?)
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Steve Comstock wrote:
Timothy Sipples wrote:
And yet
Can anyone help me in understanding the rerm Utilization of Mainframe
Software Licensing ? Does it mean taking care of licensing cost as per the
MIPS / MSU or it involves something more than that...?
JAcky
--
For IBM-MAIN
Give some context please.
-Original Message-
From: Jacky Bright [mailto:snip]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 7:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Utilization of Mainframe Software Licenses
Can anyone help me in understanding the rerm Utilization of Mainframe
Software Licensing ? Does
Friday, June 27, 2008 7:23 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Utilization of Mainframe Software Licenses
>
> Can anyone help me in understanding the rerm Utilization of Mainframe
> Software Licensing ? Does it mean taking care of licensing cost as per
> the MIPS / M
are licensing usage ... Even
>I am not aware what this jargon is ?
>
>On 6/27/08, Schwarz, Barry A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Give some context please.
>>
>>
>> Can anyone help me in understanding the rerm Utilization of Mainframe
>> Software Lic
---
Perhaps your CEO read this article by Gartner?
OVERCOMING THE SOFTWARE LICENSING COMPLEXITY CRISIS
The Case for a Universal Licensing Platform
http://www.softsummit.com/library/white_papers/gartner_overcomingcomplexity.pdf
-
he cost
of the license.
Tom Moulder
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jacky Bright
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 9:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Utilization of Mainframe Software Licenses
Can anyone help me in understandin
---
The first thing that came to my mind was the term "Shelfware". A valid
question to ask is whether software that you are paying license fees to
use is actually being used -- perhaps a rather unique view of
utilization. Further, you migh
>The first thing that came to my mind was the term "Shelfware".
When Parallel SYSPLEX first came out, you got a discount on IBM software, if
you bought at least one coupling facility and one timer. This happened even if
you didn't hook them up.
Then, a couple of years later, you had to hook them
on of Mainframe Software Licenses
>The first thing that came to my mind was the term "Shelfware".
When Parallel SYSPLEX first came out, you got a discount on IBM software, if
you bought at least one coupling facility and one timer. This happened even
if you didn't hook them up.
Then,
Ted MacNeil writes:
>When Parallel SYSPLEX first came out, you got a discount on
>IBM software, if you bought at least one coupling facility
>and one timer.
The 9037 Sysplex Timer was never a requirement for Sysplex IBM software
pricing aggregation, to the best of my recollection. It still isn't,
Ted MacNeil writes:
>>When Parallel SYSPLEX first came out, you got a discount on
>>IBM software, if you bought at least one coupling facility
>>and one timer.
I replied:
>The 9037 Sysplex Timer was never a requirement for Sysplex IBM
>software pricing aggregation, to the best of my recollection.
>
...Gee, maybe this time I can get it right. :-)
When I said "ETR" I actually mean external time source. I guess the 9037
without any sync to NIST or any other external (colloquially) time source
has been called an ETR.
Anyway, everybody should just read their contracts and that fabulous
redboo
Jujitsu are pleased to announce the release of the
following software:
GCC 3.2.3 MVS 7.5 - GCC C compiler for z/OS, MVS/380, MVS/370.
Delivered in xmit format.
GCC 3.2.3 CMS 7.5 - GCC C compiler for z/VM, VM/380, VM/370.
Delivered in vmarc format.
PDPCLIB 2.00 - C (C90-compliant) runtime library
Hi, all,
Something came up yesterday that I thought was worth sharing, as I'm
concerned about it. This looks like a wave of the future and it makes
change control on mainframes a potential nightmare if other vendors do
this.
I just had a meeting yesterday with a vendor who was touting their
soft
I did this on Vanguard's RACF products. (That is if I remember
correctly). It actually worked quite well. It's not a real big product,
so I don't think I overwhelmed the I/O, at least not for very long.
What product did you get this demo on? It must not have been Vanguard,
because their help d
I have seen some mainframe ISV products which install from a CD by
FTPing files and installation jobstreams from the PC to the host. All
the install has to provide is the host IP address, FTP logon info, file
name prefix and the like.I think there are one or two companies
which provide the
this. I now have
more to be concerned about, in my opinion, when programmers can load up
these kinds of things in "an hour".
/ptd
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Black
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 2:42 PM
To
From: "Duffy, Peter"
>
> I just had a meeting yesterday with a vendor who was touting their
> software installation GUI for the mainframe.
>
> It uses FTP under the covers to install a listener/service
> program/whatever to interface with their database nucleus to web enable
> all sorts of nifty pr
> The idea of programmers installing software via CD into product
> libraries they have access to scares the willies out of me. It is one
> of two issues I have with this.
I can see some fear of the unknown, but I don't see any reason
for panic. If your shop controls access to production librari
> Web enablement of data access is another kettle of fish. All
> computers are really good at doing what you tell them to do.
> I'm already dealing with this one on several fronts as
> applications move away from "green screens" to web front ends.
> I mention it more as what possibilities the w
I can agree that the system is "safe" - since, perhaps, the tool cannot
get any more access than the user installing it. However, at our shop at
least, the problem would be change management - but maybe not in the way
you think:
We wouldn't have any notice of the tool being installed, but th
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 06/23/2005
at 01:56 PM, "Duffy, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Something came up yesterday that I thought was worth sharing, as I'm
>concerned about it. This looks like a wave of the future and it
>makes change control on mainframes a potential nightmare if other
n things like
this before I thought I'd ask.
Thanks all for your input,
/ptd
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Craddock, Chris
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 6:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: GUI Install Procedure for ISV Mai
...
Your mainframe now has new code on it in a library your DBA has access
to.
...
Why is this an issue?
I don't care how you install a programme; if you don't have access to critical
libraries,
you cannot screw the system.
-teD
(The secret to success is sincerity.
If you can fake that,
you've
As of the 2004 tape I received from them, the answer is emphatically NO!
"Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:The details are different,
but there have been discussions before on
the lack of SMP competence at specific vendors. Has CA[1] finally
cleaned up its act?
[1] Not that th
On 24 Jun 2005 07:38:47 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>In
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>on 06/23/2005
> at 01:56 PM, "Duffy, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>>Something came up yesterday that I thought was worth sharing, as I'm
>>concerned about it. This looks like a wave of the future
I have a customer outside of Toledo, OH that is looking to migrate off the
MF but doesn't intend to do so for another 3-5 years (we've heard this
before). They have a contractor on-site that is looking to retire, and they
have a very old, unsupported environment. They are looking for someone who
ca
APPROVED BY THE LIST OWNER AS APPLICABLE
Hi all,
Just a note to let you know that this coming Friday CA May Mainframe Madness
will host a technical talk on CA Mainframe Software Manager™ Overview and
What's New Highlights.
The abstract for this presentation reads: Learn the details o
35 matches
Mail list logo
