TACM - A Fix please

2012-11-05 Thread Buckton, T. (Theo)
Hi, Please advise me on possible fixes for this problem. TACM Diagnose found an entry of a non-existent DGD-B in a WRONG-CATALOG, which should have been in another catalog. CKM11641I Record Type: B-GDGKey: PNGG00.OMPACK.CART0.DAILY/00 CKM11632W Problem: P-BCS#1-RC=92S-#1

Re: Most Current register value

2012-11-05 Thread Micheal Burn
So regardless of where the registers are saved TCB or RB the PSW is always In the most current RB Sent from my iPhone On Nov 5, 2012, at 7:41 AM, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com wrote: the PSW would be in STCBPPSW Actually, no. STCBPPSW has nothing to do with that, as the comment on that

Data Set Comparison Using Sort

2012-11-05 Thread Yifat Oren
Hello, I'm doing a Data set comparison using JOINKEYS statements. I'm trying to find a way to stop the Sort as soon as it finds the first non-matching (UNPAIRED) record - that is, we've determined the data sets are not identical - no need to keep matching records. Something like STOPAFT=1

Re: TACM - A Fix please

2012-11-05 Thread Lizette Koehler
Hi, I do not recognized the messages. What product does that belong to? Is this a repeatable failure? Have you reviewed the catalog the file(s) are in? Is the alias and dataset in the same or different catalogs? What version of z/OS are you running? What version of the product are you

Re: TACM - A Fix please

2012-11-05 Thread zMan
I expect it's Tivoli Advanced Catalog Management. GIYF... On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.comwrote: Hi, I do not recognized the messages. What product does that belong to? Is this a repeatable failure? Have you reviewed the catalog the file(s) are in?

Re: Most Current register value

2012-11-05 Thread Peter Relson
the PSW would be in STCBPPSW Actually, no. STCBPPSW has nothing to do with that, as the comment on that field indicates. This relates to why the PSW is in one RB and the regs are saved in another. You always have a top (most current) RB. That is where the PSW is saved. The external FLIH and

Re: change SL tape to NL

2012-11-05 Thread R.S.
W dniu 2012-11-05 20:40, Tim Brown pisze: Can utility IEHINITT be used to change a 3590 SL tape to NL No. However no utility is needed to do it. Simply code: //STEP1 EXEC PGM=YOURPGM it can be IEBGENER //... //OUTPUT DD ...,LABEL=(1,NL) -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland -- Tre tej

PDS/E sharing

2012-11-05 Thread Lopez, Sharon
I have a quick question on how everyone puts on maintenance to products that require PDS/Es, dynamically. I have a product CA-SYSVIEW where the loadlib is in lnklst and shared across 5 lpars in a sysplex. I want to update members from one of the lpars, but when I try, I get an abend

Re: PDS/E sharing

2012-11-05 Thread Lopez, Sharon
213-70 and I believe this is the first for SYSVIEW. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 3:07 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: PDS/E sharing Sharon, What version

Re: TACM - A Fix please

2012-11-05 Thread retired mainframer
The message is telling you that while a NVSAM(?) entry the dataset PNGG00.OMPACK.CART0.DAILY was found in this catalog (presumably you know which catalog was being analyzed), there is also an alias entry that covers the dataset and points to a different catalog. It effectively makes the dataset

Re: PDS/E sharing

2012-11-05 Thread Staller, Allan
I presume the RC from the PDSE open was 70 or 74 Add the following to IGDSMS** ( PDSESHARING(EXTENDED)and PDSE_RESTARTABLE_AS(YES)) and activate via SET SMS= This will cause 2 address spaces to be started (SMSPDSE and SMSPDSE1). After these address spaces are started, the PDSE's can

Re: change SL tape to NL

2012-11-05 Thread retired mainframer
IEHINITT generates standard labels. The usual method of converting from SL to NL is to place a tape mark at the beginning of the tape, frequently with IEBGENER specifying DD DUMMY for SYSUT1 and LABEL=(1,NL) for SYSUT2. Whether this will work may depend on the settings in your tape management

Re: PDS/E sharing

2012-11-05 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:11:51 +, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com wrote: I presume the RC from the PDSE open was 70 or 74 Add the following to IGDSMS** ( PDSESHARING(EXTENDED)and PDSE_RESTARTABLE_AS(YES)) and activate via SET SMS= This will cause 2 address spaces to be

Re: PDS/E sharing

2012-11-05 Thread Lizette Koehler
Sharon, So long as you are current on your maintanence for PDS/E then yes. Only one system can do the UPDATE on a PDSE. All others must be READ. Maybe someone had compressed the library while it was being updated? Lizette -Original Message- From: Lopez, Sharon sharon.lo...@nc.gov

Re: PDS/E sharing

2012-11-05 Thread Mark Zelden
On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:08:02 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote: On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:11:51 +, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com wrote: I presume the RC from the PDSE open was 70 or 74 Add the following to IGDSMS** ( PDSESHARING(EXTENDED)and

Re: PDS/E sharing

2012-11-05 Thread Staller, Allan
NO, parallel sysplex is not required... snip On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:11:51 +, Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com wrote: I presume the RC from the PDSE open was 70 or 74 Add the following to IGDSMS** ( PDSESHARING(EXTENDED)and PDSE_RESTARTABLE_AS(YES)) and activate via SET SMS=

Re: PDS/E sharing

2012-11-05 Thread Staller, Allan
Yes. All of the other caveats for a linklist dataset will apply ... snip Okso if I'm in a Parallel sysplex with PDS/E extended and one lpar has the library opened for read and the second lpar is trying to updates members within the pds/e, it should work? -Original Message- From:

Re: PDS/E sharing

2012-11-05 Thread Staller, Allan
One system will update, the other will be read only for the duration. After the update, LLA refresh will be required on *all* sharing LPARS to pick up the changes, I should note that this is fairly straightforward. As Mark said, all PDSESHARING(EXTENDED) must be specified on all involved

Re: PDS/E sharing

2012-11-05 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:28:28 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote: Sharon, So long as you are current on your maintanence for PDS/E then yes. Only one system can do the UPDATE on a PDSE. All others must be READ. Maybe someone had compressed the library while it was being updated? Compressed? PDSE?

Re: PDS/E sharing

2012-11-05 Thread Lizette Koehler
I was thinking that someone might have run a compress without realizing it is a PDS/E. Probably a display of SMF records might be helpful to see what had the library at the time of the error on all LPARs. If you do an IEBCOPY Compress of a PDS/E, you should see IEB1019I SKIPPING COMPRESS

Who changed the mount attrib of a zFS?

2012-11-05 Thread Roger Lowe
Hi, is there an easy way to identify who might have changed the MOUNT attribute of a zFS from RW to R? Thanks, Roger -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu

Anyone able to access the IBM® zEnterprise™ System white paper.

2012-11-05 Thread Ed Gould
I get the requested document is unavailable. No contact or anything. Ed -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

change SL tape to NL

2012-11-05 Thread Sam Golob
Hi Folks, There are two programs on the CBT Tape that can change SL to NL. These are: COPYSLNL which is a variant of the COPYFILE program, that is on File 229. And COPYMODS from CBT Tape File 229 with PARM or SYSIN option of STRIP can do it too. This is for an ENTIRE TAPE, with many