Re: I do not understand S0C6 on CDSG

2013-02-25 Thread Ed Jaffe
On 2/25/2013 5:23 PM, John Gilmore wrote: APAR OA41232 of 17 January 2013 notes that AMASPZAP cannot|could not be used on a program object for which SECTALGN(16) was specified. Just to clarify. This bug exists for PDS load modules created with SECTALGN(16) only and _not_ for program objects in

Re: JES exit 6

2013-02-25 Thread Arthur T.
On 25 Feb 2013 12:14:09 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main (Message-ID:<0e6f70937cdd8b4c83a5069c6296b38422b86...@xch-phx-101.sw.nos.boeing.com>) barry.schw...@boeing.com (EXT-Schwarz, Barry) wrote: Regarding your translate tables, rather than manually counting the number of x'00' bytes to insert

Re: I do not understand S0C6 on CDSG

2013-02-25 Thread John Gilmore
Tom Marchant wrote: And either of these of course requires that SECTALGN(16) and GOFF be specified in the assembly options. and this is of course correct.GOFF is required for any value of SECTALGN greater than SECTALGN(8). There are some further issues that I was reluctant treat in a brief

Re: SYNCSORT vs. DFSORT configuration for LE?

2013-02-25 Thread Mark Zelden
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:46:42 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >SYNCSORT is failing for me with: > >16.33.50 JOB03864 CSV003I REQUESTED MODULE SS13CEEM NOT FOUND >16.33.50 JOB03864 CSV028I ABEND806-04 JOBNAME=SORTA STEPNAME=STEP1 > >DFSORT works fine. I assume SS13CEEM is an LE mod

Re: SYNCSORT vs. DFSORT configuration for LE?

2013-02-25 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:51:22 -0500, Brian France wrote: > > SS13CEEM I believe is a Syncsort module, not a DFSORT module which is >why DFSORT works. Syncsort uses that naming convention for their >modules. In your case it would be Syncsort 1.3 or 3.1 as I think they >have some reverse thing goin

Re: SYNCSORT vs. DFSORT configuration for LE?

2013-02-25 Thread Brian France
gil, SS13CEEM I believe is a Syncsort module, not a DFSORT module which is why DFSORT works. Syncsort uses that naming convention for their modules. In your case it would be Syncsort 1.3 or 3.1 as I think they have some reverse thing going. On 2/25/2013 6:46 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: SYNC

SYNCSORT vs. DFSORT configuration for LE?

2013-02-25 Thread Paul Gilmartin
SYNCSORT is failing for me with: 16.33.50 JOB03864 CSV003I REQUESTED MODULE SS13CEEM NOT FOUND 16.33.50 JOB03864 CSV028I ABEND806-04 JOBNAME=SORTA STEPNAME=STEP1 DFSORT works fine. I assume SS13CEEM is an LE module that might be found if I provided a suitable STEPLIB. How do

Re: How SMF Logger works (was Reading Active SMF dataset)

2013-02-25 Thread John McKown
If it were me, I'd use the IEFU8n exits to copy the records I'm interested in into AMODE64 common storage. Then do an XMPOST to cause a separate STC to process them. Of course, this is much more complicated and requires at least APF authorization. --

How SMF Logger works (was Reading Active SMF dataset)

2013-02-25 Thread Jose ADAUTO Ribeiro
  Thank you for all people that answered my question.   It was very usefull to see exactly the instructions that I need to find out the SMF files and read it using OPEN/GET/RPL VSAM macro instructions.   I will use them as reference. I think that with those tips and examples it will be possible t

Re: I do not understand S0C6 on CDSG

2013-02-25 Thread Wayne Driscoll
In addition to BNDRY=PAGE, on GETMAIN or STORAGE, you could use the STARTBDY= option with a value that is a multiple of 4 to ensure quad word alignment. === Wayne Driscoll OMEGAMON DB2 L3 Support/Development wdrisco(AT)us.ibm.com ===

Re: I do not understand S0C6 on CDSG

2013-02-25 Thread Tom Marchant
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:07:31 -0500, John Gilmore wrote: >You can of course force assembly-time, zero-origin quadword alignment >within a program object using > >| CNOP byte,16 or with DS 0LQ And either of these of course requires that SECTALGN(16) and GOFF be specified in the ass

Re: Low priority workload

2013-02-25 Thread Don Deese
Hi Don, Very insightful of you. It is commonly believed that "there can be no instance of where lower importance [lower priority] work can cause a higher importance level to miss its goals, except in the case of resource groups." This belief is mostly correct from a WLM dispatching priority

Re: JES exit 6

2013-02-25 Thread EXT-Schwarz, Barry
To simplify things I have deleted the lines which contain only the tail end of comments. I have also inserted some line numbers to correspond to my comments. Line 1 tells us that JCTJCLAS contains the address of the class. You use that address correctly in the target of the EX instruction in l

Re: I do not understand S0C6 on CDSG

2013-02-25 Thread John Gilmore
You can of course force assembly-time, zero-origin quadword alignment within a program object using | CNOP byte,16 which fills n bytes, 0 <= n <=15, with no operation instructions Then asking the Binder to page-align your program object will do the job [4096 = 0 mod(16)]. For a loca

rmf spreadsheet reporter v1 r12 and microsoft excel 2010?

2013-02-25 Thread Kenneth Klein (TEMA TPC)
Is excel 2007 the highest level that the spreadsheet reporter supports? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Problem with SYSEVENT QVS

2013-02-25 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In , on 02/21/2013 at 08:54 AM, Peter Relson said: >If Gerhard meant that, he would have been incorrect. CVT is the >name of the DSECT when CVT DSECT=YES is used. >CVTMAP is a name for the beginning as well. What if PREFIX=YES is used? BTW, where is the CVT amcro documented these days? --

Query for Destination z article: successor training and knowledge transfer

2013-02-25 Thread Gabe Goldberg
Blah, blah -- we hear constantly about the oncoming (or current!) brain drain of a mainframer generation retiring. We certainly hear on these lists about individuals retiring (and congratulations for that!). So, is it a crisis or is it about as well predicted and handled as Y2K (that is, antic

Re: Colossus

2013-02-25 Thread John Gilmore
Thomas/Tommy Flowers has received further posthumous recognition in recent years, but he deserves still more. He lived to a great age and was finally, I believe, knighted. (The MBE he had received earlier seemed to be to be paltry recognition for his contributions.) I met him on one occasion in

Re: Defined capacity

2013-02-25 Thread Al Sherkow
I have discussed the problem of IRD and GCL with multiple clients and with IBM. That this exists is certain. Also I heart that IBM does not intend to fix this. Unfortunate decision in my opinion; and not good for the mainframe ecosystem. I have never discussed a problem with IRD and Defined Cap

Re: I do not understand S0C6 on CDSG

2013-02-25 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:49:59 -0600, John McKown wrote: >Depends on the contents of register 11. B040 will be quad word aligned only >if register 11 is itself quad word aligned. If you got this from a STORAGE >OBTAIN or GETMAIN, then the alignment is only guaranteed to be double word >aligned, unle

Re: I do not understand S0C6 on CDSG

2013-02-25 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:40:08 -0600, Donald Likens wrote: > >Is there a good way in assembler to insure a double word starts on a quadword >boundary? > DS((*+15-CSECT)/16*16)C o There may be an easier way. o This presumes CSECT is on a quadword boundary. There may be ways to force

Re: I do not understand S0C6 on CDSG

2013-02-25 Thread John McKown
Depends on the contents of register 11. B040 will be quad word aligned only if register 11 is itself quad word aligned. If you got this from a STORAGE OBTAIN or GETMAIN, then the alignment is only guaranteed to be double word aligned, unless you ask for it to be page aligned. There is no way to req

Re: I do not understand S0C6 on CDSG

2013-02-25 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
X'B040' is only on a quad-word boundary if the contents of R11 are already on a quad-word boundary. It's not just the displacement, but the contents of the base register plus the displacement (i.e., the effective address) that must be quad-word aligned. HTH Peter -Original Message- F

I do not understand S0C6 on CDSG

2013-02-25 Thread Donald Likens
I am missing something: The Principles of Operations states: COMPARE DOUBLE AND SWAP (CDSG) must be designated on a quadword boundary. The R1 and R2 fields for COMPARE DOUBLE AND SWAP must each designate an even-numbered register. Otherwise, a specification exception is recognized. I think th

Re: Reading Active SMF dataset

2013-02-25 Thread Barry Merrill
If you are going to read any VSAM SMF file, active or inactive, you don't have to read the full file - you can (MXG DOES) stop when you encounter a block that starts with 'SMFEOFM', as that is the logical end of file marker. All subsequent blocks in that VSAM file are also 'SMFEOFM' populated. Bar

Colossus

2013-02-25 Thread Terry Sambrooks
Hi, In the posting about Fortran, John Gilmore rightly paid tribute to Alan Turing and John von Neumann. When discussing Colossus however the name of Tommy Flowers is often forgotten which is a shame as it was he who turned the theory into practical reality by actually building the beast. Kind R

Re: OT: Solaris 7 Software

2013-02-25 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <020d01ce0fcf$dd80b650$988222f0$@mindspring.com>, on 02/20/2013 at 06:07 PM, Lizette Koehler said: >I am not sure where is the best place to post. alt.solaris.x86 comp.unix.solaris -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT Atid/2 We do

Re: Reading Active SMF dataset

2013-02-25 Thread Skip Robinson
OK, since I didn't see anyone else asking of OP: why this preoccupation with reading the active SMF MANx? When I converted to SMF log stream, I never even fleetingly considered delving into active data. What do you expect to see there that would influence your conversion plan? . . JO.Skip Robi

Re: Load To Global with PC_cp (OT)

2013-02-25 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <12e58ce9881ac54091618c736fa1ac647120dac...@corpexmbx.bekco.com>, on 02/20/2013 at 05:07 PM, Greg Shirey said: >Telling others what to post doesn't often occur - asking others >*not* to post off-topic content does occasionally occur. As opposed to telling others not to post *on-topic* con

Re: SV: SV: SV: Article for the boss: COBOL will outlive us all

2013-02-25 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <201302201529.55146.jlturr...@centurytel.net>, on 02/20/2013 at 03:29 PM, Leslie Turriff said: >All issues with level numbers and usage clauses may be quickly >resolved by looking at the COBOL Language Reference manual >(unless one has an aversion to reading it). Or, more likely, the syn

Re: Mod-9 vs. Mod-27 vs. mixed

2013-02-25 Thread Tom Sims
Thank you all for your insightful user experiences in response to my question. If I may summarize the points that apply to my particular situation: * No real issues with respect to backups, particularly for consolidations, e.g. of volume pools -- in fact we may even see a slight impro

Re: Reading Active SMF dataset

2013-02-25 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>>For now, I need to know the better way to read the SMF dataset. >If you mean you want to READ an ACTIVE and IN USE the VSAM SMF datasets, yes, >it is possible. A third party tool do it for 'just in time' analysis' without >waiting for the switch from ACTIVE to DUMP status. You can just use IF

Re: Spacewar! on S/360

2013-02-25 Thread Anne & Lynn Wheeler
l...@garlic.com (Anne & Lynn Wheeler) writes: > VNET wiki reference > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_VNET > > misc. past posts mentioning internal network > http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subnetwork.html#internalnet re: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013b.html#7 Spacewar! on S/360 warning: vnet topi

Re: JES exit 6

2013-02-25 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
Hmmm ok. my production jes has this: DESTID(VPRT1) DEST=U1 DESTID(INB) DEST=N67 DESTID(PEIA400) DEST=N68 DESTID(VPRT2) DEST=U2 DESTID(VPRT3) DEST=U3 DESTID(VPRT4) DEST=U4 DESTID(VPRT5) DEST=U5 DESTID(VPRT6) DEST=U6 DESTID(VPRT7) DEST=U7

Re: JES exit 6

2013-02-25 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Mark Zelden wrote: >I didn't look at the code closely, but since it works in your onepack, could >there be something different about that VPRT dest in the production JES2 >that is keeping that compare from working. Perhaps some RACF profile is stopping the OP? Try $T DEBUG,SECURITY=YES to

Re: JES exit 6

2013-02-25 Thread Mark Zelden
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:03:03 -0500, Crabtree, Anne D wrote: >I am trying to modify JES exit 6 so that jobs, starting with a particular >string and destination is to a particular partial string, get assigned a class >of F (jobname beginning with WE# and destination beginning with VPRT). I

Re: Reading Active SMF dataset

2013-02-25 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Jose ADAUTO Ribeiro wrote: >For now, I need to know the better way to read the SMF dataset. If you mean you want to READ an ACTIVE and IN USE the VSAM SMF datasets, yes, it is possible. A third party tool do it for 'just in time' analysis' without waiting for the switch from ACTIVE to DUMP stat

JES exit 6

2013-02-25 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
I am trying to modify JES exit 6 so that jobs, starting with a particular string and destination is to a particular partial string, get assigned a class of F (jobname beginning with WE# and destination beginning with VPRT). I also want to prohibit non SY users from using class Z. I modifie

Re: Gilmore vs ... er, almost everybody ... ;-)

2013-02-25 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Shane Ginnane wrote: >Personally I enjoy Johns contributions - acerbic or otherwise. >And his jousts with gil. >Bloody sight more entertaining than most of the drivel that this list >generates. Agreed! When I want entertainment, I just look at those posts and those O/T things. ;-D Groete / G

Re: Spacewar! on S/360

2013-02-25 Thread Anne & Lynn Wheeler
spmcbr...@us.ibm.com (Sean P. McBride) writes: > I recently found out that Edson Hendricks (the creator of VNET) wrote > a copy of Spacewar! for the IBM System 360 while he was an MIT > student. It was based on the PDP-1 version, and it was used by MIT > for their annual open house in either 1965

Re: Secure Service Delivery

2013-02-25 Thread Donald J.
By "it" the reference was to the Co:z SFTP. OMVS openssh 5 supports chroot, but apparently only when using "subsystem sftp internal-sftp". The previous OMVS ported tools version did not support chroot. Co:z seems to require use "Subsystem sftp /u/local/coz/bin/sftp-server.sh" which appears to prev

Re: Spacewar! on S/360

2013-02-25 Thread John P Kalinich
The Michigan Mods tapes are on the CBT web site. Regards, John K From: Clark Morris To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Date: 02/25/2013 06:56 AM Subject:Re: Spacewar! on S/360 Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List On 24 Feb 2013 23:37:07 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main yo

Re: IXGBRWSE (LogStream Browse)

2013-02-25 Thread John Gilmore
The answer Nick Jones provided is more specifically helpful than he makes it out to be. Look at the topic Writing an ENF event 48 listen exit in z/OS MVS Programming: Authorized Assembler Services Guide, SA22-7608-xx. On 2/25/13, Nick Jones wrote: > Hi John, > > Nothing directly will tell you

Re: Spacewar! on S/360

2013-02-25 Thread Clark Morris
On 24 Feb 2013 23:37:07 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >In a google search, I saw a textbook mention of the game, and that it >was ported. No mention of the software. Did find a web site with the >PDP-1 version with a PDP-1 emulator on the browser page at >http://www.geek.com/article

Re: IXGBRWSE (LogStream Browse)

2013-02-25 Thread Nick Jones
Hi John, Nothing directly will tell you that more data is in the log stream. You can do one of these to simulate this. 1) If you own the writing and reading applications you can signal yourself to read some more 2) Your program can wake up once in a while and browse again. Another EndReached

Re: Defined capacity

2013-02-25 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Hi Al, Back from holidays, I was reading the requests about IRD and DC/GCL and saw you answered them. My understanding is however, that IRD Weight management stops, "when an LPAR is softcapped", both by the Defined Capacity and by the Group Capacity Limit. This is probably explainable, becaus

Re: Fortran

2013-02-25 Thread Peter Sylvester
ther was some competition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z4_%28computer%29 The *Z4* was the world's first commercial digital computer , designed by German engineer Konrad Zuse