It's certainly possible to have DSORG=PS,RECFM=U data set that does not
contain load modules. I've used them. I believe it's also possible to
have DSORG=PO,DSNTYPE=PDS,RECFM=U with content other than load
modules, but ISPF refuses to recognize this fact. I don't know whether
Have someone been able to find the file with old NewFunction Apars
mentioned on the last page of the document?
My search always ends with no document.
Obtaining Older New Function APAR Numbers
Once you have a subscription for all the future New Function APARs, you
may want to see the prior New
Me neither.. however;
It was actually able to find it on the actual Announcements page:
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/PRS5188
Best regards,
Ronald Kristel
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:04:50 +0100
From: werner.kueh...@mannheimer.de
Subject: Re:
Thanks Peter and Richard:
Finally we've customized this IEASYMxx member:
SYSDEF HWNAME(P007ED2A) /* CPC MAJADAHONDA */
|--- Main site
SYMDEF(HWNAME='ED2A') /* CPU HARDWARE NAME */ |
SYMDEF(SITE='HWNAME(-2:2)')/* MEMBERS
Hi
If someone has experience with APA and DB2,as currently seems to me,
the APA DB2 interface not working
(no any DB2 measurement) , and no any error message about this.
We are now z/OS 1.13 DB2 V10.0 and APA 7.1
--
Kind regards, / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Miklos Szigetvari
Research
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:04:09 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
...
And then compare it to www.ibm.com
Now that's just cruel - IBM continually demonstrate their inability to
maintain websites.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of nitz-...@gmx.net
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 7:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF statistics
It's certainly possible to have DSORG=PS,RECFM=U data set that
I suspect that every product that exploits zIIPs already does this.
Vendors cannot count on zIIPs being installed at customer locations.
If no zIIPs are available, the work must run in TCB mode. Vendor
products can't just terminate if zIIPs aren't available.
/end extract
I suspect the
I suspect the opposite, since it is not true that if no zIIPs are available,
the work must run in TCB mode. Bob must have been thinking of something else.
That is correct. I zoned out.
Bob
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
Hey, I do not need ALETs in the plist.
Interesting. Over 25 years late to the party (this support was introduced
in the 80's).
And didn't need the call macro to overlay data following the plist.
It doesn't seem right to blame the macro for correctly implementing its
long-existing rule that
AGREED! (in spades)
snip
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Shane Ginnane
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 4:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ObamaCare Web Site Problems
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:04:09 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
...
Does anyone have an answer for my second question: How does the version in the
pdf statistics get incremented (other than by some form of the VERSION command)?
Barbara
Barbara,
The version is usually updated by EDIT, you'll see the current version
listed in the title line on the edit
Hello Miklos,
APA V7 went out of support late in 2009 when V10 went GA. We are currently
at APA V13.
Is there a chance you could upgrade APA?
Feel free to send me an email at kph...@us.ibm.com if you have questions.
Ken Hume
Product Manager, Application Performance Analyzer
z/OS AD Tools
Ah. just one more note.
As 64 Bit Versions of Windows are not able to run 16 Bit Executables any more,
you may want to give DOSBox (http://www.dosbox.com/) a try if you really can't
live without the ancient SPF/PRO or whatever (I assume these old applications
are 16 Bit applications -
W dniu 2013-10-31 13:46, Michael Knigge pisze:
Ah. just one more note.
As 64 Bit Versions of Windows are not able to run 16 Bit Executables any more, you may
want to give DOSBox (http://www.dosbox.com/) a try if you really can't live
without the ancient SPF/PRO or whatever (I assume
Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN wrote:
Maybe Ed McMahon would have said it better.
Who is he/it? I don't recall his/it name here on IBM-MAIN.
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On 2013-10-31 10:32, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Maybe Ed McMahon would have said it better.
Who is he/it? I don't recall his/it name here on IBM-MAIN.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_McMahon
--
--
Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software International
(a division of Mazda Computer Corporation)
I think IFLs run about 10% of a full speed CP processor. So it
doesn't take too much to make them cost effective.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:02 PM, adarsh khanna adarshkha...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Timothy.I get it.
IFL costing across models is more to do with marketing and product
On 28 October 2013 22:24, adarsh khanna adarshkha...@yahoo.com wrote:
Does the cost of adding an IFL different on different machines e.g. 2817
compared to 2098. If yes why? as it is just characterization of a core.
You can just as well say that the difference between a CP and an IFL
is just
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Shane Ginnane ibm-m...@tpg.com.au wrote:
deleted
Not denigrating anybodies efforts, merely seeking some clarity in a field
left deliberately murky by the major vendor.
They will give you the details. After you sign a non-disclosure
agreement and write a check.
On 31 October 2013 01:35, Timothy Sipples sipp...@sg.ibm.com wrote:
Shmuel Metz writes:
...z/OS does require EBCDIC.
It does not (if referring to ported applications), and repeating a
falsehood does not make it any more true.
EBCDIC support is required if and only if there is a requirement
Gord Tomlin wrote:
Maybe Ed McMahon would have said it better.
Who is he/it? I don't recall his/it name here on IBM-MAIN.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_McMahon
Thanks very much! I have learned something new about an entertainer... ;-)
At least he seemed to be a better guy than that McMahon
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 11:38 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
He said I think IFLs run about 10% of a full speed CP processor. So
it doesn't take too much to make them cost effective.
I think he meant 10% of the price, not the speed.
There's a maintenance charge for that IFL too.
--
David
Doug,
I don't how much your insurance is but I can tell you in NJ, it ain't cheap
over $1000 a mth for 3 ppl
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Oct 30, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Doug Fuerst d...@bkassociates.net wrote:
How is that? That:
Dave,
Try a D TCPIP,TCPIP,n,sock ...that's if ur TCPIP STCname is tcpip. You will see
the waits, we see that on our system..while tcpip cleanups up the sessions
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Oct 31, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Hansen, Dave
http://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=1298857
Have you tried a cleaning tape?
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Pommier, Rex rpomm...@sfgmembers.com wrote:
Hi,
We have an IBM 3584 library. The front panel display is showing error B282.
The maintenance manual that we got with the
I wanted to test my notion before presenting it, and it does turn out
that embedding an unreferenced value in a structure (COBOL record) at
least one other element of which is referenced in an executable
statement ensures that that structure will not be deleted.
A PL/I example
declare 1
HSM is intermittently failing to backup new datasets. I suspect that
someone/something is resetting the changed or archive bit on the dataset before
HSM gets to it.
Can anyone tell me how I can view the state of the changed bit on a dataset?
Furthermore, I’m only guessing but I would hope that
This certainly seems like a reasonable behavior for an optimizing
compiler, but does the formal PL/I semantics demand the behavior you
have observed or is this just the current implementation behavior? If
this behavior is not formalized in language semantics, does that not
allow a more
My 1st suspect would be df/dss. There is an option to set/reset the change
bit.
HSM also had an option to reset change bit on dump. Check the fine manuals.
Couple of old programs on the CBTAPE can show the state of this bit. (DASD? Not
sure which file this is in.)
HTH,
snip
HSM is
I suppose one might increase the likelihood of non-optimization by putting
the dummy field AFTER the copyright string.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of John Gilmore
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:55 AM
To:
These are DASD datasets.
I have, indeed, read the 180,000+ pages of HSM and other systems manuals and
I'm sure the one reference is in there somewhere. :-)
I've Googled this and searched the IBM-MAIN archives, too, but no joy. I've
looked at the layout of the VVDS, thinking it would be
Check the VTOC instead of the VVDS. I found this on an APAR.
DFSMShsm will be changed to reset the DS1DSCHA bit to OFF in
the format-1 DSCB of each volume the data set resides on during
backup processing. This solution applies only to nonVSAM data
sets.
-Original Message-
From: IBM
The VDL formalization of PL/I does not guarantee this behavior. I am
not, however, at all fearful that some optimizer may behave
differently, at least for long.
There is an old understanding common to scientific and business
programming that aggregates, arrays and structures|records, are likely
DFP advanced services is where you'll find it documented, but I don't know how
to report it out.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 2:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
David G. Schlecht wrote:
HSM is intermittently failing to backup new datasets. I suspect that
someone/something is resetting the changed or archive bit on the dataset
before HSM gets to it.
Can anyone tell me how I can view the state of the changed bit on a dataset?
Look at the bits in
1. ADRDSSU used to turn off the changed bit after a volume backup by
default. It has been changed to not be the default but can be
selected by a used.
2. Management class field Backup Required value no allows a dataset to
migrate before being backed up.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:51 PM, David G.
David,
It ain't pretty, but you can do an IEHLIST of the VTOC in DUMP format. The
byte at offset 93 is where you will find the DS1CHIND bit (bit ..1.). One
thing to remember is the dump portion of the listing actually starts at offset
44 of the format1 DSCB.
Rex
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013
Wonderful! Thanks, Rex.
David G. Schlecht | Information Technology Professional
State of Nevada | Department of Administration | Enterprise IT Services
T:(775)684-4328 | F: (775) 684‐4324 | E:dschle...@admin.nv.gov
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Found it. One of the grabbers failed. The CE showed me where the error code
is cleverly hidden in the maintenance manual.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 11:29 AM
To:
FWIW, in z/OS C/C++, you can use #pragma comment copyright -
http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r13/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.zos.r13.cbclx01%2Fpragma_comment.htm
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
--
Hi,
I am trying to test a SyncSort exit using TSO TEST.
The exit is not re-entrant if I load the exit under TEST would SyncSort first
Check the Jpa to see if the exit was already loaded.
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
--
For
You can see the state of the changed flag in ISMF option 1. It is column
24.
Thank you and have a Terrific day!
Jonathan Goossen, DTM
ACT Mainframe Storage Group
Personal: 651-361-4541
Department Support Line: 651-361-
For help with verbal communication and leadership skills checkout
Easier than chasing an unformatted IEHLIST!
Thanks, Jonathan,
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jonathan Goossen
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 2:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM and changed
I am trying to assemble SHOWMVS and am getting lots of undefined op codes.
This is my SYSLIB concatenation:
//SYSLIB DD DSN=SYS1.MACLIB,DISP=SHR
// DD DSN=SYS1.AMACLIB,DISP=SHR
// DD DSN=SYS1.AMODGEN,DISP=SHR
Anything else needed in SYSLIB?
Thanks
John Norgauer
Senior
You need the MACLIB that is distributed with SHOWZOS.
Alan Field
Technical Engineer Principal
BCBS Minnesota
Phone: 651.662.3546 Mobile: 651.428.8826
From: John Norgauer john.norga...@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 10/31/2013 16:19
Subject:
Yes, indeed, that is much easier. Also, mentally parsing out the TSO LISTDS
LABEL output is an easy one-step, now that I know what bit I'm looking for.
Thanks, everyone, for your input.
BTW, reading the docs for this bit is less than helpful. Two bits in the DSCB
seem likely candidates but
On 10/31/2013 5:53 AM, Martin Packer wrote:
Ed, do you do some kind of simple cost to start up vs saving swag when
deciding whether to do this?
Yes. We are measuring to determine the break even points that work best
for us and hope they extrapolate to our customers. During ESP, we might
ask
Take a look at the lengths of the undefined opcodes too. It is just
possible---not, I suspect, very likely---that you are using the wrong
opcodes table.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
The sample from the CBTTAPE should have all of the concatenations.
You did not include the SHOWMVS dataset in the SYSLIB
Check out the member called SHOWJCL - it has everything there
//SYSLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.MACLIB
// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.MODGEN
//* OS/390 (R6) and below
//* If
PS. I find that reading the member called @FILE492.txt always helpful.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 3:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
Thanks all for the pointers.
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis Medical Center
1651 Alhambra Blvd
Suite 200
Sacramento, Ca 95816
916-734-0536
SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING.. Guilty, until proven innocent !! JN 2004
My analysis uses SMF data and is based only on public documentation of the SMF
data. I have to explain my analysis to customers and clients so anything I
might know under NDA is not useful in those circumstances.
If some vendor(s), as Ed wrote are using CPU and it is not marked as zXXP
On 10/31/2013 7:42 AM, Mike Schwab wrote:
I think IFLs run about 10% of a full speed CP processor. So it
doesn't take too much to make them cost effective.
Specialty engines always run at full speed. THAT's what makes them cost
effective...
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International,
On 10/31/2013 10:31 PM, Ed Jaffe wrote:
On 10/31/2013 7:42 AM, Mike Schwab wrote:
I think IFLs run about 10% of a full speed CP processor. So it
doesn't take too much to make them cost effective.
Specialty engines always run at full speed. THAT's what makes them
cost effective...
Oops.
55 matches
Mail list logo
