Welcome to the discussion Dave :p
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I regularly vary 1000s of volumes online/offline several times a day, and
sometimes several times in a few minutes.
I don't want no steenkin' changes unless the default remains as it is now.
I do recall doing this on the z9 was a major pain and slow as watching grass
grow, but on a z196 it's all
Must have missed that thread :^\
On 19 Dec 2013, at 4:52 pm, Shane Ginnane ibm-m...@tpg.com.au wrote:
Welcome to the discussion Dave :p
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Ron Hawkins wrote:
I regularly vary 1000s of volumes online/offline several times a day, and
sometimes several times in a few minutes.
Just curious if you don't mind please, but how are you doing it? Manually,
programmatically (REXX with CONSOLE or Assembler with SVC 34 or something
else?) or
Is there a way to customize the ACTUAL Telnet solicitor panel. I would like
to add a list of available applications as text to the panel. I can't seem
to find the panel itself anywhere.
Anyone done this ?
Jim McAlpine
--
For
Hello Jim,
its a standard USS-Table from Vtam. So you can create your own and activate it
with OBEY.
BEGINVTAM
PORT
USSTCP
regards Juergen
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
The short answer is that any module loaded by an authorized program
must come from an authorized library.
I've been reading this post with interest since I've had to do a lot to deal
with authorized services loading programs from unauthorized libraries. I
have a utility that copies the
Jim McAlpine wrote:
Is there a way to customize the ACTUAL Telnet solicitor panel.
'solicitor' is an unknown word to me in this context. Are you perhaps referring
to a USS Table load module and its Logmode table as served by TN3270 on a z/Os
machine?
I would like to add a list of available
the Telnet solicitor panel looks like this -
Enter Your Userid:
Password:New Password:
Application:
and you just have to enter the application name in the application field.
Jim McAlpine
On 19 December 2013 12:11, Elardus Engelbrecht
Jim McAlpine wrote:
the Telnet solicitor panel looks like this -
Enter Your Userid:
Password:New Password:
Application:
and you just have to enter the application name in the application field.
Oh, yes, thanks. I know it as 'USS logon panel' and we are
it should be a combination of
USSMSG
USSCMD
USSPARM
described in SNA Resource Definition Reference
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message:
It's USSTCP in ADCD z/1.13. It's a stand non-SNA screen with SBA, SF ..etc
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Dec 19, 2013, at 8:02 AM, Juergen Keller
juergen.kel...@deutsche-boerse.com wrote:
it should be a combination of
USSMSG
On 12/18/2013 11:42 PM, David Crayford wrote:
The new IBM knowledge center, which will replace Information Center, is
available for beta http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/. First
impressions are quite good. It's snappy, well laid out and allows
customers to add content. A quick look
Ich bin ab 19.12.2013 außer Haus und ab 06.01.2014 wieder im Büro.
I'm out of the office from 19.12.2013 and will be back on 06.01.2014.
Gerne werde ich Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Ralf Zantopp
On 12/19/2013 6:47 AM, Jim McAlpine wrote:
Is there a way to customize the ACTUAL Telnet solicitor panel. I would like
to add a list of available applications as text to the panel. I can't seem
to find the panel itself anywhere.
Anyone done this ?
Jim McAlpine
Jim,
AFAIK, you can't modify
Tom,
Exactly, clone and modify
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Dec 19, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Thomas Conley pinnc...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
On 12/19/2013 6:47 AM, Jim McAlpine wrote:
Is there a way to customize the ACTUAL Telnet
We are going to change our hardware. One of the changes will be
transition from CryptoExpress3 (old, long cards) to CryptoExpress4S
(short, PCIe cards). The number of engines will remain the same. The
system is z/OS 1.13 with HCR77A0 ICSF fmid.
Should I expect any troubles? Hidden traps?
--
Sounds like you will be ok.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 10:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: CryptoExpress3 to 4S migration - any gotchas?
We are going to change
Hello Chris ,
This is a very good explanation . But that still leaves OP's last question
If IDCAMS requires APF authorization for called modules, why does IDCAMS work
when the JOBLIB is supposedly not authorized by introducing a non-authorized
library to the JOBLIB?
I assume OP ran the job
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg245677.pdf
There is also an IBM Tool, which you must license that can help with the
migration. There are also Technical Services which can be contracted to
help, if that is of interest.
Thanks,
Craig
From: Robert Hahne
On 2013-12-19 01:42, David Crayford wrote:
The new IBM knowledge center, which will replace Information Center, is
available for beta http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/. First
impressions are quite good. It's snappy, well laid out and allows
customers to add content. A quick look
We did this a few years ago and I ended up writing a great deal of REXX code to
read in Top Secret reports and then create the appropriate RACF commands. It
was not an overly painful conversion, but we did spend a couple of months
testing out the process on our test system. I don't have
I am attempting to mount my target datasets in /SERVICE directory to apply
maintenance. I am having diffaculty mounting the CIM zFS file into
/SERVICE/var/webm - my /var is a SYM to /SYSTEM.. if i direct my mount to
/SERVICE/SYSTEM/var/webm, i get an error : BPXF135E rc81.. if i create a new
Brett,
What is the return code telling you ? That's the first step.
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Dec 19, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Brett Danals bdan...@hastingsmutual.com wrote:
I am attempting to mount my target datasets in /SERVICE
The message should have included a reason code. If so, then TSO BPXMTEXT
x will display information that will help you determine what may be
your problem.
Jon Perryman.
From: Brett Danals bdan...@hastingsmutual.com
I am attempting to mount my
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:21:01 +0530, Robert Hahne wrote:
Hello Chris ,
This is a very good explanation . But that still leaves OP's last question
If IDCAMS requires APF authorization for called modules, why does IDCAMS work
when the JOBLIB is supposedly not authorized by introducing a
Elardus,
Sometimes manually, sometimes through batch JCL, sometimes automated as part of
a test suite, but usually just a variation on RO *ALL,V 8000-8FFF,ONLINE.
I work in a lab, so we usually do this when starting up a test, but when
testing replication you can be taking things
I had to create ./wbem in var. That filesystem is really just an empty work
filesystem, came with serverpack, but nothing in SMPE references that on my
systems. I do not mount a Service version. I instead copied it and made
system specific filesystem and mounted in /var for each system I
A small correction. It is not *empty*, and does have a directory structure.
It is part of CIM. Here is the relevant info from one of the manuals:
To place the CIM server repository and the log files in a separate file system,
perform the following steps. For a better maintainability, it is
On 19 December 2013 01:42, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com wrote:
The new IBM knowledge center, which will replace Information Center, is
available for beta http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/.
There seem to be two quite different Knowledge Centers here: the one
for z/OS is very
On 19 December 2013 12:48, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net wrote:
There seem to be two quite different Knowledge Centers here: the one
for z/OS is very different from then one for IBM i. The z/OS one seems
to just point to PDFs, but the IBM i one is more like the Information
Centre, with
I think I covered that, but obviously not well enough.
If no called/loaded modules exist in the JOBLIB/STEPLIB, and all are in the
LINKLIST, then that meets the requirement that all LOADs occur from authorized
libraries. It doesn't matter if JOBLIB/STEPLIB are authorized or not.
I think he
Thank David,
I was attempting to create a separate directory/mountpoint and mount my target
version to the new location.. which is when i get the 79 EINVAL, which refers
to a root of an already mounted file system.. doesnt seem to like anything i
attempt. Never thought about making a copy of
This is going to be a SAMPLE exit. Modification before manual
installation might be frequent..
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Ron Hawkins ronjhawk...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Elardus,
Sometimes manually, sometimes through batch JCL, sometimes automated as part
of a test suite, but usually
1.13 was installed by someone else.. so i'm playing catch up. I attempted to
mount at /SERVICE/var/wbem at first that's when i received the rc81.. so i
tried other locations.. that's the rc79.. thought about the copy to other zfs..
may have a problem there too, it won't be mounted in the
I have a C threading question.. My scenario multiple C threads, posix(on), who
all can call a Cobol thread aware program in the threads, with their own
local-storage. My question is will each thread have storage that will be
separate from each other ? These called programs have the same
Suggest you do you homework like several of us has suggested, he is 2 mins on
google
BPXF135E RETURN CODE return_code, REASON CODE reason_code. THE MOUNT FAILED FOR
FILE SYSTEM fsname.
Explanation: The system was unable to mount the file system because of the
condition indicated by the
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have a C threading question.. My scenario multiple C threads, posix(on),
who all can call a Cobol thread aware program in the threads, with their
own local-storage. My question is will each thread have storage that
Got it Scott... Thanks for the help
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:03:09 -0600, craig.p...@fotlinc.com wrote:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg245677.pdf
There is also an IBM Tool, which you must license that can help with the
migration. There are also Technical Services which can be contracted to
help, if that is of interest.
Brett,
Good, return codes for modules are hard to find ...I know the feeling
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Dec 19, 2013, at 2:18 PM, Brett Danals bdan...@hastingsmutual.com wrote:
Got it Scott... Thanks for the help
When I provided feedback that a search for a current DB2 APAR number
and a search for a System Message (IEF032I) (i.e., A Look-AT query),
returned no hits,
in spite of Google responding with many hits for each search,
I received this reply.
Barry
APARS and PMRs are outside the scope of IBM
On 12/18/2013 10:42 PM, David Crayford wrote:
The new IBM knowledge center, which will replace Information Center,
is available for beta http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/.
Obviously, it's not yet been populated with z/OS content. I did a simple
search for IEA101A. It came up with
I can wait for the search population :)
It does seem responsive, but it took a lot of clicks to find z/OS.
Once, in a document, it still has what is for me a primary irritation just like
the Info Center. I want keyboard based forward and backward navigation when
reading subjects sequentially.
Return codes are documented in 'SYS1.MACLIB(BPXYERNO)'.
Using BPXMTEXT with the reason code usually provides the information you need
in resolving these problems.
Jon Perryman.
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
Good, return codes for modules are
Gil,
Like Jim, we call IDCAMs from a STC and we had to be APF authorized we process
define/deletes for aliases...
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Dec 19, 2013, at 1:02 PM, Jim Mulder d10j...@us.ibm.com wrote:
It's possible that
On the search. I did find z/OS 1.13 and the migration manual. Yesterday, I
discovered the Auto-reply feature (new with 1.12).
Today, in the Knowledge Center, looking at the page in the migration manual
containing the string AUTOR00, I entered the string in the search and found
nothing.
Chris et al,
Since I'm the OP, here is the detail of what has me so confused. Sorry for the
length of the post, but it's the only way to show why I'm befuddled. I read
your first post talking about the APF versus LINKLIST versus JOBLIB and I agree
with you - that was/is how I understood APF
Thank you John, I missed it in my old age mucho thx
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Dec 19, 2013, at 2:16 PM, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
I’m missing something here (as usual). Assembler program, running in Batch,
wants to write a message to the job log. I’m doing WTO with ROUTCDE=11,
which puts the message in the JESMSGLG. Is that my only real option? Seems
like it should be easy to write to SYSPRINT, but I can’t find a way to do
WTO doesn't write to SYSPRINT. Use normal OPEN - WRITE/PUT - CLOSE to the
SYSPRINT DCB processing.
Ant.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of zMan
Sent: Friday, 20 December 2013 9:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Consulting assistance is certainly a good idea, but the coin has two
sides. My shop converted from ACF2 to RACF before I came here in the mid
90s. Without being familiar with the environment, the consultant employed
a fairly mechanical conversion that attempted to carry forward as much as
zMan, did you look at the WTL macro ?
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Dec 19, 2013, at 6:41 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
I’m missing something here (as usual). Assembler program, running in Batch,
wants to write a message
Mark:
I do not care for consultants in general.
But when you have a project such as conversion like this I will say
this.
HIRE a Good consultant it is well worth the time and the money.
Ed
On Dec 19, 2013, at 1:33 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:03:09 -0600,
WTL won't help either. It's just a more specific form of WTO.
Jon Perryman.
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: WTO confusion
zMan, did you look at the WTL macro ?
Jon,
So all you can do is define a DCB, open it and issue a PUT ?
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD
'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
On Dec 19, 2013, at 7:55 PM, Jon Perryman jperr...@pacbell.net wrote:
WTL won't help either. It's just a more specific form of WTO.
Mark:
I agree with Ed. And, make sure they have done this before and preferably,
have an automated solution that is proven in the marketplace. My partner and I
are about to embark on another such project after the first of the year.
Regards,
Mitch McCluhan,
Legacy Modernization Consultant
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:41 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
I’m missing something here (as usual). Assembler program, running in Batch,
wants to write a message to the job log. I’m doing WTO with ROUTCDE=11,
which puts the message in the JESMSGLG. Is that my only real option? Seems
It's a crazy shortcoming of z/OS and why the console is littered with
OPENING MASTER INPUT FILE messages: way easier to write a message to the
console than to SYSPRINT.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of zMan
Sent:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
It's a crazy shortcoming of z/OS and why the console is littered with
OPENING MASTER INPUT FILE messages: way easier to write a message to the
console than to SYSPRINT.
Too bad HLASM did not include some of the ASSIST
Charles:
I made sure that part of the COBOL standards( COBOL was the only
language permissible). DISPLAY UPON CONSOLE were not permitted nor
was accept from console allowed.
Ed
On Dec 19, 2013, at 8:17 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
It's a crazy shortcoming of z/OS and why the console is
Since I'm the OP, here is the detail of what has me so confused.
Sorry for the length of the post, but it's the only way to show why
I'm befuddled. I read your first post talking about the APF versus
LINKLIST versus JOBLIB and I agree with you - that was/is how I
understood APF to work.
Ron Hawkins wrote:
Sometimes manually, sometimes through batch JCL, sometimes automated as part
of a test suite, but usually just a variation on RO *ALL,V 8000-8FFF,ONLINE.
I work in a lab, so we usually do this when starting up a test, but when
testing replication you can be taking things
zMan wrote:
Assembler program, running in Batch, wants to write a message to the job log.
I'm doing WTO with ROUTCDE=11, which puts the message in the JESMSGLG. Is that
my only real option? Seems like it should be easy to write to SYSPRINT, but I
can't find a way to do that!
Neither me, but
Pommier, Rex wrote:
Since I'm the OP, here is the detail of what has me so confused. [ ... snipped
... ]
I'm also confused, but before you follow Jim Mulder's recommendation, could you
perhaps reread in 'MVS Initialization and Tuning Guide' these two parts:
'Placing Modules in the System's
65 matches
Mail list logo
