It is quite clear that IBM mainframes follow Moore's law, and I wanted to see
if I could verify that somehow.
Looking at disk space costs by megabyte is just mind blowing. Not sure I can
use that. Would I graph the costs?
My question is, what criteria could I use if I wanted to make a simple
Hi
This module DSI4LSIT exist in HLQ.NETV.LPALIB
Please check if this DSN is in LPA and APF
Hello,
I am trying to start NEVSSI address space and getting below
issue
SETSSI ADD,SUBNAME=NET6,INITRTN=DSI4LSIT
RESPONSE=SYS01 IEFJ023I SETSSI ADD COMMAND FOR SUBSYSTEM NET6
COMPLETED
Lindy Mayfield wrote:
It is quite clear that IBM mainframes follow Moore's law, and I wanted to see
if I could verify that somehow.
Based on what are you making above claim?
My question is, what criteria could I use if I wanted to make a simple graph?
MIPS is the only thing I can think of,
Yes, This problem got resolved. By mistakes the required dataset was not
cataloged into system. So, system was not taking it . But now, when I am
starting netview address space getting below error.
DSI089I INVALID STATEMENT IN NCCF MEMBER CNMCMD
%INCLUDE AQNCMD
DSI090I LOAD FAILED FOR NCCF
Problem resolved after looking at DSIPARM CNMSCAT2 member and removing this
wronly put include statement. Thanks all for help ,
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Mainframe Mainframe
mainframe1...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, This problem got resolved. By mistakes the required dataset was not
On 9/06/2014 2:43 PM, MichealButz wrote:
I set a program in all 3 places of LPA modified,fixed,pageable via the
SETPROG console command however in all instances the CSVQUERY returns a
X'04' in ATTR3 byte
Indicating the program is in CSA. Additionally I added the OUTVALID param
and it indicates
John,
I like your idea. I have a couple (perhaps somewhat naive) comments:
1. Why not just provide a straightforward, identical C/C++ interface to
the work already done in JZOS? C/C++ can call Java via JNI, and there's a
choice of 31-bit or 64-bit calling. (Supporting both would be nice.) Or at
MichealButz wrote:
I set a program in all 3 places of LPA modified,fixed,pageable via the SETPROG
console command however in all instances the CSVQUERY returns a X'04' in ATTR3
byte
On what z/OS version are you?
Indicating the program is in CSA. Additionally I added the OUTVALID param and
It still is referenced by common below is my PROG01 entry
LPA ADD MODNAME(USERMOD) DSNAME(USER.TEST.LOAD) FIXED
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Greg Price
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 4:44 AM
To:
1.13
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 9, 2014, at 5:21 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za wrote:
MichealButz wrote:
I set a program in all 3 places of LPA modified,fixed,pageable via the
SETPROG console command however in all instances the CSVQUERY returns a
X'04' in
After starting Netview 6.1, I am getting below warning on console.
DWO093W Required automation at risk. Member DSITBL01 notactivated.
I followed below link to resolve this issues,
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21625799
But, I don't find any changes, which I need to make to
Cross-posted to the IBMVM, Linux-390, and IBM-MAIN discussion lists.
The 2014 VM Workshop, June 26-28 2014 will be conducted at North Carolina AT
State University, Greensboro NC
The Early Registration deadline for guaranteed delivery of a free 2014 VM
Workshop polo shirt (for regular
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 05:43:29 -0400, MichealButz michealb...@comcast.net wrote:
It still is referenced by common below is my PROG01 entry
LPA ADD MODNAME(USERMOD) DSNAME(USER.TEST.LOAD) FIXED
So, did you add it via a SETPROG command or not?
--
Walt
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Timothy Sipples sipp...@sg.ibm.com wrote:
John,
I like your idea. I have a couple (perhaps somewhat naive) comments:
Thanks for the encouragement. Comments always welcome. I need all the
thoughts I can get!
1. Why not just provide a straightforward,
Did both but I still only get x'04' from attr3
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 9, 2014, at 7:20 AM, Walt Farrell walt.farr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 05:43:29 -0400, MichealButz michealb...@comcast.net
wrote:
It still is referenced by common below is my PROG01 entry
LPA ADD
Hello,
I am suddenly getting below error on one of my SYSPLEX system.
IEA651E SYSPLEX DUMP DIRECTORY PREOCESS TERMINATED.
there is no associated message with this. I check the DUMPSRV address
space and this is also working. But I am not able to identify that how to
check for current
On 06/09/14 07:52, venkat kulkarni wrote:
Hello,
I am suddenly getting below error on one of my SYSPLEX system.
IEA651E SYSPLEX DUMP DIRECTORY PREOCESS TERMINATED.
there is no associated message with this. I check the DUMPSRV address
space and this is also working. But I am not
Did you check the message ?
IEA651E
SYSPLEX DUMP DIRECTORY PROCESSING TERMINATED
Explanation
Because of a failure, the system could not automatically add a source
description for an SVC dump to the sysplex dump directory. This is the tenth
failure. The cause of the failures could be that:
A quick internet search with IBM DWO093W came up with this URL
http://tinyurl.com/pybkdzq
Frequently Asked Questions:
Q) Must NetView's shipped automation table, DSITBL01, be active in every
NetView, even with multiple NetViews in a single LPAR? (On newer releases, I'm
noticing a DWO093W
yes, Mark. I already check. SYS1.CAPC.DAE dataset mentioned in ADYSET00
parmlib member is in good shape . But not sure why still we getting this
issue.
/d DUMP
IEE852I 04.54.10 SYS1.DUMP STATUS 960
SYS1.DUMP DATA SETS AVAILABLE=000 AND FULL=000
CAPTURED DUMPS=, SPACE USED=M, SPACE
Hello Lizette,
Yes, I checked IEA651E message and also checked
with DUMPSRV address space. But not able to point out exact issue.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
wrote:
Did you check the message ?
IEA651E
SYSPLEX DUMP
Thanks for response. I already have below entry in my C00STYLE DSIPARM
member, but looks to be commented.
So, does it mean that we just have to remove comment from column one and
then restart NETVIEW to resolve this issue.
But, I don't find any changes, which I need to make to solve this error.
Robert Wessel robertwess...@yahoo.com writes:
I'd be careful making that claim...
A resource is:
http://www.tech-news.com/publib/index.html
Anyway, approximate price for a 485 MIPS 9021-9X2 in 2Q94 is $1.3M,
for a 78,426 MIPS 2827-7A1 in 3Q12 $33.1M.
In terms of MIPS growth, that's
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 06:26:52 -0500, John McKown wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
2. If you package your work up in a dataset -- and I don't have an opinion
on that -- given the recent discussion about compiler trends I'd say a PDSE
would be recommended over a PDS.
I've read some headline news about those data set organizations.
However I'd like to learn more, where can I find relevant information?
BTW: I just learnt the limitation for Extended Format (V1 I suppose)
which is approx. 2^32 blocks.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
Treść tej
Would anyone know what the diag info and what the flags mean ?
FLAGS MODULEENTRY PT LOAD PT LENGTHDIAG
DFP USERMODDACEE 80C87000 00C87000 1310 02075EA8
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I have inherited a newly acquired mainframe server which I am trying to
instrument with XDC. It has a number of worker ASIDs which are RENT, reside
in an APF library but run in problem state with all authorised stuff is done
by a user SVC. This is because each ASID is a TSO batch job which starts
You did not mention the release of z/OS you are on.
Next, the DAE dataset is not what is the problem
Creating the sysplex dump directory
The sysplex dump directory is a shared VSAM data set that contains information
about SVC dumps that have been taken on each of the systems in the sysplex. As
Call Bob Shimizu at 1-800-932-5150. He can be most helpful.
Chris Blaicher
Principal Software Engineer, Software Development
Syncsort Incorporated
50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677
P: 201-930-8260 | M: 512-627-3803
E: cblaic...@syncsort.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM
On 6/8/2014 11:25 PM, Lindy Mayfield wrote:
My question is, what criteria could I use if I wanted to make a simple graph?
MIPS is the only thing I can think of, and if it is, would I use the maximum
MIPS for every model? 360, 370, 4341, up to z10, and so on.
Moore's Law is all about chip
On 6/9/2014 6:33 AM, MichealButz wrote:
Would anyone know what the diag info and what the flags mean ?
FLAGS MODULEENTRY PT LOAD PT LENGTHDIAG
DFP USERMODDACEE 80C87000 00C87000 1310 02075EA8
Last I checked, the flags were fully documented with the message. If
Thanks for reply .I checked this link before. But issue is, how do I know
that do I have any SYSPLEX dump directory defined on my system or not. Any
display command. Because I don't find any dataset SYS1.DDIR with this name
etc. Currently we are at z/OS 2.1
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:45 PM,
On 6/9/2014 6:39 AM, Robin Atwood wrote:
The advice is to issue a 'SET ZAP SPROT' command but that makes no
difference.
It sounds like this code might not be APF authorized or executing in
privileged mode when the HOOK matches.
You might try changing the JCL to invoke via XDCCALLA.
--
Did you check BLSCUSER with the dump directory name.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of venkat kulkarni
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 7:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSPLEX ISSUE
Thanks
yes, I did. We never touched it .But while resolving other issues, the
major issue, I am getting is with DUMP dataset. While IPL system, I am
getting so many dumpdataset generated from XCAS,MASTER, JES2, DUMPDSRV jobs
not able to identify the root cause of this
IEF196I IGD100I 376A ALLOCATED TO
In that case you probably need to open a case with IBM Support. You probably
have a configuration issue, however, since we cannot see your system - you
should contact IBM.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of
It looks like some are getting C03 abends
IBM decided to no longer be nice to programs and require that all programs
close any files they open. And if they did not close them, the system would
then issue a SC03 abend.
Definitely open an SR with IBM on z/OS V2.1
Lizette
-Original
Yes, but before raising PMR I wanted to try all possible solution we can.
So still trying to resolve the same.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
wrote:
It looks like some are getting C03 abends
IBM decided to no longer be nice to programs and require
On 6/9/2014 9:23 AM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
IBM decided to no longer be nice to programs and require that all programs
close any files they open. And if they did not close them, the system would
then issue a SC03 abend.
MsgIEC999I and abendC03 are not new and AFAIK there has been no such
We dont have this CSVLLAxx parmlib member defined in our systems.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Ed Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
wrote:
On 6/9/2014 9:23 AM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
IBM decided to no longer be nice to programs and require that all
programs close any files they open.
Sure. I will check now. But I am also getting many other messages related
to dump and keep filling my volumes
IEF196I IGD100I 376A ALLOCATED TO DDNAME SYS00011 DATACLAS ()
IEF196I IEF237I 376A ALLOCATED TO SYS00010
IEC999I IFG0TC0A,IFG0TC0B,MSTJCL00,LLA ,DEB ADDR=6D20EC ,DSN =
We just starting VLF and DLF, we have proc for LLA proc as well but not
using it .
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:53 PM, venkat kulkarni venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sure. I will check now. But I am also getting many other messages related
to dump and keep filling my volumes
IEF196I
You obviously have a serious configuration problem. Is this your first z/OS 2.1
system?
After the IEA371 message, what is the very first abend/dump message?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of venkat kulkarni
Sent:
On 6/9/2014 11:04 AM, venkat kulkarni wrote:
We dont have this CSVLLAxx parmlib member defined in our systems.
In that case, LLA should not even start.
I also see MSTJCL00 in the message, so you might want to check the
libraries referenced there to be sure all is well...
--
Edward E Jaffe
Why is this?
IEFJ003I DUPLICATE SUBSYSTEM SMS NOT INITIALIZED.
Check the IEFSSNxx members.
Verify your parmlib concatenation is what you want.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of venkat kulkarni
Sent: Monday, June 09,
Yes, this is my first z/OS 2.1 system.
START RACF,SUB=MSTR
IEE252I MEMBER IEFSSN02 FOUND IN SYS1.PARMLIB
IEA045I AN SVC DUMP HAS STARTED AT TIME=08.14.17 DATE=06/09/2014 273
FOR ASID (0001)
ERROR ID = SEQ4 CPU00 ASID0001 TIME08.14.17.5
QUIESCE = YES
IEFJ003I DUPLICATE SUBSYSTEM SMS NOT
yes, there was issue with SMS and it was not started. But how this can
cause DUMP issues, what we facing. I think both issues are separate. What
you suggest.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu wrote:
Why is this?
IEFJ003I DUPLICATE SUBSYSTEM SMS NOT INITIALIZED.
When your problem is to many dumps, the answer is to fix problem causing the
dumps, not to increase the number of dumps you can process.
Fix the SMS problem and throw away all the dumps in the full directory.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Yes, I resolved SMS issues. For the current dmup dataset, you want me to
just delete it from ISPF 3.4 . Or something else.
Ex :
SYS1.DUMP.D140609.T151417.SYS9.S1
SYS1.DUMP.D140609.T151417.SYS9.S3
SYS1.DUMP.D140609.T151418.SYS9.S2
SYS1.DUMP.D140609.T151418.SYS9.S4
Hmmm. There's not enough information here to give a definitive
solution, but I will comment a little bit on some of what I am able to glean.
The advice is to issue a 'SET ZAP SPROT' command but that makes no difference.
The fact that SET ZAP SPROT does not resolve your issue indicates
Hello.
1. How can I read the SMF 119 records?
2. It is possible with a Rexx program, Cobol, Application or similar?
I have not experience to use the SMF records.
Please, if somebody have a program, utility or the necessary instructions for
read the SMF records, could you send me a copy or
Check the DUMPDS command in the MVS commands book.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of venkat kulkarni
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 12:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSPLEX ISSUE
Yes, I resolved
Paul Wells wrote a C program that reads type 119 records and donated it to the
CBT tape several years ago. I've been using it for a long time.
It is file 600 on the CBTTAPE website http://www.cbttape.org/
HTH,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
This is no different than reading any other SMF record.
In theory, any program/clist/exec/shell script, can read the records
provided the security subsystem grants you access.
The question is how much work do you want to do?
The SAS or WPS languages are considered the standard tool for
Just curious:
Lately, doing an SMP/E test receive, I got messages such as:
GIM35401ISMPTLIB hlq.fmid.F1 WAS DELETED AND UNCATALOGED FROM VOLUME ...
GIM35201ISMPTLIB hlq.fmid.F1 WAS ALLOCATED AND CATALOGED ON VOLUME ...
But I pretty clearly remember on other occasions getting messages to
Allan:
I suggest he uses DAF from the CBTTAPE.ORG it reads SMF and gives
various reports depending on you needs. My memory is iffy but I
*THINK* there is a SMF 119 report as well.
Ed
On Jun 9, 2014, at 3:00 PM, Staller, Allan wrote:
This is no different than reading any other SMF record.
In 5395c8cf.1030...@phoenixsoftware.com, on 06/09/2014
at 07:46 AM, Ed Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com said:
Moore's Law is all about chip density, not MIPS.
You're both wrong; it's about performance. Chip density is relevant
only to the extent that it contributes to higher performance or
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 5395c8cf.1030...@phoenixsoftware.com, on 06/09/2014
at 07:46 AM, Ed Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com said:
Moore's Law is all about chip density, not MIPS.
You're both wrong; it's about performance. Chip density is relevant
only to the extent that it
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 11:46:06 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
on 06/09/2014 at 07:46 AM, Ed Jaffe said:
Moore's Law is all about chip density, not MIPS.
You're both wrong; it's about performance. Chip density is relevant
only to the extent that it contributes to higher performance or
I'm totally agree with all of you.
Thank you very much to all for your support and answers.
My interest on the SMF 119 record is because I need to know the maximum
information of an OSA-Express3 Card.
Also, I've used OSAENTA function (unfortunately we do not use SNMP by the
system resource
I have just reread Gordon Moore's original 1965 formulation of his
eponymous law; and it is my guess that it has proved to be so protean
in large part because it can be interpreted in many different, loosely
related ways.
An algebraic formulation with dimensioned elements would spoil all the fun.
deerh...@ix.netcom.com (Bob Rutledge) writes:
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/history/museum-gordon-moore-law.html
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014h.html#2 Demonstrating Moore's law
370/168-3 3MIPS approx 40yrs ago, ec12 743MIPS processor, 248times,
approx. 1.23 to 1.24 times every
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpieces/pdfs/sg248190.pdf
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
63 matches
Mail list logo
