Rick,
It doesn't surprise me at all that if you have AOP-TRAYID set to 1 5 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 that you can only ever reach two trays on your printer. After
all, you only have two trays defined (PCL tray 1 and PCL tray 5).
Take a look at my earlier note and see if it starts to give you some clues
wha
Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
>I do not think that just reading the catalog would be a problem but
>adding/deleting datasets as well as doing the updates involved with
>opening/closing existing datasets may have an effect due to locking of the
>catalog during these operations.
Agreed. Think 'cata
Tools for IBM z/OS RMF are available for download here:
http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/features/rmf/tools/rmftools.html
Timothy Sipples
IT Architect Executive, zEnterprise Industry Soluti
On one monoplex it also has RESOLVER, on another (which is a one-system sysplex
with a CF) the stepname changes from an in-house STC to APPC.
What they all seem to have in common is that the names appearing do not have a
JES id. That inhouse-STC gets me 'JCT unavailable' when I try to see the JC
On 2014-06-24, at 12:52, Neil Duffee wrote:
>
> I don't have the original message(s) handy but I do note the following in the
> v1.12 utilities manual under SYSUT1 for IEBGENER: "... In all other cases, a
> default
> logical record length of 80 is used."
>
And more. In the job:
//
//JCLSYM
At 17:32 -0500 on 06/23/2014, Ed Gould wrote about Re: Catalog
considerations for a new(ish) systems programme:
Tom:
I would change it slightly to "How Many TSO users are signed on at one time"
An additional change (I think) - For the proposal of counting "How
Many?", consider a batch job a
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:10:29 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote:
>Try //ddname DD *,RECFM=VB,LRECL=259,BLKSIZE=0
>
Interesting. If I have//SYSUT1DD *,SYMBOLS=CNVTSYS
Lots of data to fill up a line, followed by a long symbol to see &X.
I get the IEB351I I/O ERROR, but if"
//SYSUT1DD *,SYMBOLS=CN
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:10:29 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote:
>Try //ddname DD *,RECFM=VB,LRECL=259,BLKSIZE=0
>
Gives me:
* TOP OF DATA
*
STMT NO. MESSAGE
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 24, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Walt Farrell wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:51:27 -0400, Micheal Butz
>> wrote:
>>
>> The first explanation fits my scenario
>> My program is in the AUTHPGM section of IKJTSOxx
>>
>> the command profile nowtpmsg
>> Is unauthoriz
In , on 06/23/2014
at 11:25 AM, Peter Hunkeler said:
>Working on some asm code I stumbled on an call to SVC 61.
TESTRAN and TSO TEST.
>Neither googling nor searching MVS and TSO manuals helped to find
>what IKJEGS6A does.
It should be in the logic manual for TSO TEST.
--
Shmuel (Sey
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:51:27 -0400, Micheal Butz
wrote:
>The first explanation fits my scenario
>My program is in the AUTHPGM section of IKJTSOxx
>
>the command profile nowtpmsg
>Is unauthorized command but so
>What does that mean because my
>Program is in the authcmd/PGM
>I cann't invoke a com
On 2014-06-24 12:52, Neil Duffee wrote:
>
> I don't have the original message(s) handy but I do note the following in the
> v1.12 utilities manual under SYSUT1 for IEBGENER: "... In all other cases, a
> default
> logical record length of 80 is used."
>
> SYSUT1 DD Statement
> The input data se
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:28:26 +0530, Mainframe Mainframe
wrote:
>3) Do I have to make any changes in RACF to avoid these issues.
As another list member indicated, you should look up the ICH70007I message and
take the actions indicated in the book.
--
Walt
Caveat:
I don't have the original message(s) handy but I do note the following in the
v1.12 utilities manual under SYSUT1 for IEBGENER: "... In all other cases, a
default
logical record length of 80 is used."
SYSUT1 DD Statement
The input data set for IEBGENER, as specified in SYSUT1, can co
I did set it to zero
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 24, 2014, at 1:51 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
>
> The first explanation fits my scenario
> My program is in the AUTHPGM section of IKJTSOxx
>
> the command profile nowtpmsg
> Is unauthorized command but so
> What does that mean because my
> Progr
The first explanation fits my scenario
My program is in the AUTHPGM section of IKJTSOxx
the command profile nowtpmsg
Is unauthorized command but so
What does that mean because my
Program is in the authcmd/PGM
I cann't invoke a command that's not authorized
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 24, 201
Obviously, my answer is to install MXG Software (which can execute on ANY
platform
with SAS or WPS, including a PC Workstation) and then use the SMF 30 Interval
data
(dataset PDB.SMFINTRV to MXG-literate folks) to see all of the CPU times for
both
your GP/CP Engines and your zIIP/zAAP/Specialty
Look at the manual:
60(3C) One of the following occurred:
v An authorized program or command requested that an unauthorized
function be invoked.
v An authorized program or command invoked the TSO/E service
facility, but indicated that the requested function be invoked from an
unauthorized environm
Hi,
I know I get beat up for not doing my leg work but I researched this as best
I could
I am trying to invoke a PROFILE NOWTPMSG
And keep on getting a X3C in the reason code parameter register 15 has a
X14 the return code parameter is -1 X
The following is my param
There is always my favorite workhorse for EBCDIC (or ASCII or binary), HexEdit
Pro, http://www.hexeditpro.com/. It's not free, but it's well worth the price.
It's very powerful and frequently updated with new function.
Howard Turetzky
Ricoh
-
John McKown wrote:
>When I need to capture the "current" z/OS SYSLOG to a data set, I do it by
>going into SDSF DA. I then SORT ASID to get *MASTER* to the top. I then put a
>? in front of it to show the SYSLOG entry, which I can then use like an XD
>command to copy to disk. But I've noticed so
On 6/23/2014 3:31 PM, Storr, Lon A CTR USARMY HRC , US wrote:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Hello List,
Our "newby" team had an interesting discussion today regarding catalog "best
practices". I thought it would be enlightening to ask the list for input.
If you could rebuild your
When I need to capture the "current" z/OS SYSLOG to a data set, I do it by
going into SDSF DA. I then SORT ASID to get *MASTER* to the top. I then put
a ? in front of it to show the SYSLOG entry, which I can then use like an
XD command to copy to disk. But I've noticed something "weird". I have two
Correction(*):
We hit this years ago.
I even made calculations to monitor if we were approaching the limit and had to
add another usercatalog.
The limit is the size of aliases for a usercatalog in the Mastercatalog record.
The sum of all values: 'alias length + 3 bytes' (*) is limited to about 3
Correction(*):
We hit this years ago.
I even made calculations to monitor if we were approaching the limit and had to
add another usercatalog.
The limit is the size of aliases for a usercatalog in the Mastercatalog record.
The sum of all values: 'alias length + 3 bytes' (*) is limited to about 3
We hit this years ago.
I even made calculations to monitor if we were approaching the limit and had to
add another usercatalog.
The limit is the size of aliases for a usercatalog in the Mastercatalog record.
The sum of the lengths of all the aliases is limited to about 32300 bytes. So
this is a
Not to pick nits, but the APAR says it is 1.12 and above, not 1.11.
In any case, I missed this enhancement, so thank you, Mr. Relson, for pointing
it out.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter Relson
Sent: Tues
I have never hit this restriction in 40 years. IIRC it is a large number.
I was thinking more about the SIZE of the catalog, not the number of aliases
associated with the catalog.
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 19:51:26 +, Staller, Allan wrote:
>I am not sure I can see the need (technically) for more
Hi Relson,
Thank you for the additional info.
Regards,
Suresh
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Peter Relson wrote:
> >The following rules apply to the creation of COMMNDxx:
> >...
> >Do not specify comments.
>
> That was the old rule.
> As of z/OS 2.1 or as of z/OS 1.11 with APAR OA38328, the
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 15:50:28 -0700, Skip Robinson
wrote:
>I posted this question on JES-L but did not get a response. Has anyone
>made this transition from V1 to V2?
>
>.
>.
>J.O.Skip Robinson
>Southern California Edison Company
>Electric Dragon Team Paddler
>SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
>626-30
Tom Marchant wrote:
It depends upon how many TSO users you have. IIRC, there is
a limit to the number of associations a user catalog can have.
There is indeed, and you can only have about 3,500 prior to z/OS V1.13.
But in z/OS V1.13 and z/OS V2.1, with Type V extension records enabled
(mak
To Tim Sipples, I've captured what should be the AFP data that would be used
in the Infoprint AFP2PCL transform. Is there any way I could identify the tray
numbers or the values you indicated in the record(s)? We have AOP-TRAYID set
to 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 and we have the two pages printing fr
http://hothardware.com/News/How-Vacuum-Tubes-New-Technology-Might-Save-Moores-Law-/
It turns out that when you shrink a Vacuum transistor to absolutely tiny
dimensions, you can recover some of the benefits of a vacuum tube and dodge
the negatives that characterized their usage. According to a re
Alex Wang wrote:
>Thank you! Barry.
Barry is an absolute guru when it comes to SMF and he is very kind to help out
here on IBM-MAIN!
>If we want to know how exactly much CPU time (Unit: seconds) spending on a
>certain AS (Address Space) / Started Task, how could we get this information?
Ju
>The following rules apply to the creation of COMMNDxx:
>...
>Do not specify comments.
That was the old rule.
As of z/OS 2.1 or as of z/OS 1.11 with APAR OA38328, the new rule is
"Lines that begin with an asterisk in column 1 are comments."
The new rule is documented in the z/OS 2.1 infocenter an
Use SMF 30 (2,3) Interval records. Most customers have this on - in my
experience.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
Thank you! Barry.
But the RMF Workload Activity Report only shows the performance fators in WLM
service class / report class level.
If we want to know how exactly much CPU time (Unit: seconds) spending on a
certain AS (Address Space) / Started Task, how could
we get this information?
Take my
Thanks Rob.
I found this statement in TCPIP profile. but I will remove
this as we not using monitoring
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Rob Scott
wrote:
> The SYSTCPSM socket is part of the z/OS TCP/IP Network Management
> Interface.
>
> Specifically it streams the TCP/IP serve
Hello:
We've defined our devices in secondary site in subchannel set 2 like 3390D and
assigned to disaster recovery OS. My question is about the esoterics assigned
to 3390D device in subchannel set 2. HCM doesn't allow to assign esoterics to
devices different of subchannel set 0. If we put ena
The SYSTCPSM socket is part of the z/OS TCP/IP Network Management Interface.
Specifically it streams the TCP/IP server SMF data (eg FTP and Telnet) so that
a monitoring product can intercept the data (SYSTCPDA is for packet trace data).
The socket is created in response to the "NETMONITOR SMFSER
Use the RMF Workload Report which shows times, with these caveats
(from MXG Documentation on Processor Utilization, ACHAP10):
Barry Merrill
The zIIP/zAAP normalization factors are only provided in the
SMF 30, 72, 79, 89, and 120, and RMF RCD records.
However, the IBM RMF reports pr
While bringing up netview address space on z/OS 2.1 system , I am getting
below issues.
BNH601I TCPSM REQUEST ON SOCKET /var/sock/SYSTCPSM.TCPIP ENDED DUE TO
SOCKET INTERFACE TERMINATION .
but this error doesn't seems to be related to Netview. BNH601I message
description
'requestname' REQUEST
Hi Folks,
Is there anyone who knows how to calculate the CPU time in seconds by
the data showing on the RMF "The Processor Usage report"?
E.g.
RMF V1R13 Processor Usage Line 1 of 1
Samples: 900
Hi All,
During the Z/OS maintenance apply cycle I got a message IXMSCRPA was not
found and I just created a empyt File IXMSCRPA the APPLY job completed with
RC-0.
/usr/lpp/ixm/IBM/IXMSCRPA
SMP/E 36.22
SEQ NUM 05
/usr/lpp/ixm/IBM/IXMSCRPA: not found
>From SMPOUT
CA
Mainframe Mainframe wrote:
>As we are running under sysplex, and RACF are shared across system. This is
>newly installed system and getting issue only on this system . So, I feel RACf
>cant be issues here.
Ok. I see now. You have One RACF and One SysPlex. One question, do you share
JES2 in tha
45 matches
Mail list logo
