Re: Looking for an assembler sample of HTTP/HTTPS protocol enabler

I've got a strange error wheil specifying uti option. when the uri is 127.0.0.1, I am able to connect the a local web server on the mainframe. When I specify an external IP on the HWTHSET call, I get rc 204 and the diagnostic area has the text "Invalid option characters". both are coded the same

Re: Initiator - Identify the List of Jobs

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote: > What jobclasses are assigned to 16? OR is it a WLM Init? > ​I don't think that WLM initiators have names or numbers, do they?​ > Lizette > > -- Klein bottle for rent -- inquire within. Maranatha! <>< John

Re: Initiator - Identify the List of Jobs

What jobclasses are assigned to 16? OR is it a WLM Init? Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Jake Anderson > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 10:47 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Initiator -

Re: Initiator - Identify the List of Jobs

So could you provide the reason for the question? What are you trying to research or resolve? Is the issue from a current issue (within a week)? Or past history (older than a week)? The more details you provide, the better the answer will be. SYSLOG Scans will be faster. DAF (from

Re: Initiator - Identify the List of Jobs

Initiator 16 alone On Jul 27, 2016 11:13 PM, "Tom Marchant" < 000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 21:30:33 +0530, Jake Anderson wrote: > > >I am trying to fetch the List of Jobname that used a specific Initiator. > Is > >there a way to determine ? > > Dr.

Re: Initiator - Identify the List of Jobs

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 21:30:33 +0530, Jake Anderson wrote: >I am trying to fetch the List of Jobname that used a specific Initiator. Is >there a way to determine ? Dr. Merrill gave you a clue, but I have a question. What do you mean by "A specific initiator"? Do you mean: 1. For example, initiator

Re: AW: Re: Follow-on: S0C4-11 abend caused by BASSM to address with all X'00' bytes

> > >I don't know how LE plays that game. A SLIP of the 0C4 would have > true contents. > > System Trace would also help with this information but it is not > in the dump produced by the "little"helpers". Setting a SLIP in > production is a not so short adventure trip; and SLIPping for a 0C4 >

Re: Initiator - Identify the List of Jobs

Ok, now that I know there is an appropriate SYSLOG message, should I then add that MXG also can create an SMF record from any SYSLOG message, as part of the MXG Tape Mount Monitor and SYSLOG Record SMF Recorder? Barry -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: Initiator - Identify the List of Jobs

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Jake Anderson wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to fetch the List of Jobname that used a specific Initiator. Is > there a way to determine ? > > Is that again an SMF report would tell ? > > Jake > A ​s Doctor Merrill indicated, I don't

Re: Initiator - Identify the List of Jobs

MXG Softare, long ago, provided code for IEFU84 Exit to populate the Initiator Name and Number into the SMF 30 subtype 1 record: Change 22.136 The SMF Exit code to put Initiator Name and Init Number IEFU84 if the PROGRAM field in the SMF 30 subtype 1 record that Jun 24, 2004 was

Re: CERTAUTH vs SITE vs user certificate

Actually with RDATALIB, you should be able to share a cert with multiple regions as well without using SITE. Rob Schramm On Wed, Jul 27, 2016, 12:01 PM Ward, Mike S wrote: > I know that a site certificate can b e shared by many CICS regions with > different controlling

Re: CERTAUTH vs SITE vs user certificate

I know that a site certificate can b e shared by many CICS regions with different controlling userids. A user certificate requires that each region that is sharing the cert have the same userid. Hope that helps. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Initiator - Identify the List of Jobs

Hello, I am trying to fetch the List of Jobname that used a specific Initiator. Is there a way to determine ? Is that again an SMF report would tell ? Jake -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

Re: PDSE V2 MaxGen Limit Query

This worked for me: CVT = C2d(Storage(10,4)) CVTDFA = C2d(Storage(D2x(CVT + 1216),4)) /* cvt + 4c0 */ DFAMGEN = C2D(storage(d2x(cvtdfa + 76),4)) /* dfa + 4c */ say 'Maxgen Limit:' dfamgen Thank you -- Lionel B.

Re: Looking for an assembler sample of HTTP/HTTPS protocol enabler

Hi Tim. I will look at the libk, but i did what you suggested yesterday night and i have a working pgm. Still need to put error handling ibside... Best ITschak בתאריך 27 ביול 2016 17:19,‏ "Timothy Sipples" כתב: Have you consulted this information yet?

Re: PDSE V2 MaxGen Limit Query

Indeed, that worked for me, thumbs up! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Klaus Stanislawiak Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 1:28 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: PDSE V2 MaxGen Limit Query Please have a look

Re: Looking for an assembler sample of HTTP/HTTPS protocol enabler

Have you consulted this information yet? https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.ieac100/ieac1-cwe-http-prog.htm https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.ieac100/ieac1-cwe-http.htm There's quite a bit of information on Assembler

CEEOPTS (was: Follow-on: S0C4-11 abend caused by BASSM to address with all X'00' bytes)

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 06:29:48 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote: >Since z/OS V1.13, you can add CEEOPTS as a JCL Statement > >https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_1.13.0/com.ibm.zos.r13.ceea500/ceedd.htm > Is this a new reserved DD Name? Actually, that 1.13 documentation is better than

AW: Re: AW: Re: Follow-on: S0C4-11 abend caused by BASSM to address with all X'00' bytes

>Since z/OS V1.13, you can add CEEOPTS as a JCL Statement Yes, I know. It is not that I would not know *what* to do if I was allowed to do it. -- Peter Hunkeler -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: AW: Re: Follow-on: S0C4-11 abend caused by BASSM to address with all X'00' bytes

Since z/OS V1.13, you can add CEEOPTS as a JCL Statement https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_1.13.0/com.ibm.zos.r13.ceea50 0/ceedd.htm Language Environment allows you to provide additional invocation-level run-time options using the CEEOPTS DD statement. The CEEOPTS DD can refer

AW: S0C4-11 abend caused by BASSM to address with all X'00' bytes

>Is the program CALLed (or "called")? CICS, IMS, DB2, batch? You mentioned >records and database, so I'd take a stab at batch with IMS or DB2. The program is called via EXEC PGM=, and it is using DB2. We live in a complex environment here, i.e. we've got a home grown middle ware layer that

Re: Follow-on: S0C4-11 abend caused by BASSM to address with all X'00' bytes

>Just my 2 cents: As long as TRAP(ON,SPIE) is set (and you said you cannot turn >it off for various reasons) slip will not get control because (E)SPIE gets >control before slip. So your slip trap probably won't match at all. In another case where the application failed with an S30A-10

S0C4-11 abend caused by BASSM to address with all X'00' bytes

Ok, either from the Production compile listing or by browsing the member on the Production loadlibrary, can you provide the 36 bytes, in hex (even better binary :-) ) from displacement X'84' from the start of the program? These are the "signature information bytes" which the compiler includes

Re: AW: Re: Follow-on: S0C4-11 abend caused by BASSM to address with all X'00' bytes

> >I don't know how LE plays that game. A SLIP of the 0C4 would have true > >contents. > System Trace would also help with this information but it is not in the dump > produced by the "little"helpers". Setting a SLIP in production is a not so > short adventure trip; and SLIPping for a 0C4 is