TPX is good and easy to use
On 18-Aug-2017 10:19 AM, "Lucas Rosalen" wrote:
> Yes, it is.
> In my previous and current shops we're using it.
>
>
>
Yes, it is.
In my previous and current shops we're using it.
---
*Lucas Rosalen*
Emails: rosalen.lu...@gmail.com / *lrosa...@pl.ibm.com
*
LinkedIn:
> On Aug 17, 2017, at 5:20 PM, Roberto Halais wrote:
>
> Hi listers:
>
> IBM has notified that IBM Session Manager product will be phased out by the
> end of 2018.
>
> They suggest we migrate to IBM CL/Supersession.
>
> I would like to know of other vendor products
NCPASS is used by DOD and it is used for authentication
Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Gibney, Dave
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 7:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM Session Manager
I have had both CL/Supersssion and TPX
TPX is a pos in my opinion
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Regan
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 6:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM Session Manager
Not yet submitted. Please comment.
COBOL Language Environment “warning” messages (severity code 1) are written to
the destination supplied by the MSGFILE runtime option. This defaults to
CEEMSG for batch jobs and the CESE TD queue for CICS (where CESE is generally
mapped to the CEEMSG DD…)
NETPASS from BIS
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Mark Regan
> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 4:57 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: IBM Session Manager replacement
>
> There is TPX from CA.
>
>
There is TPX from CA.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017, 18:21 Roberto Halais wrote:
> Hi listers:
>
> IBM has notified that IBM Session Manager product will be phased out by the
> end of 2018.
>
> They suggest we migrate to IBM CL/Supersession.
>
> I would like to know of other
On 8/9/2017 11:05 PM, Peter wrote:
Is anyone performing any kind of testing on zOS 2.3 and found any defects
or any gotchas ?
https://share.confex.com/data/handout/share/129/Session_21586_handout_10845_0.pdf
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El
Super session is a good product originally written by Candle
Sent from my iPhone
Sorry for any grammar problems
> On Aug 17, 2017, at 17:20, Roberto Halais wrote:
>
> Hi listers:
>
> IBM has notified that IBM Session Manager product will be phased out by the
> end
Hi listers:
IBM has notified that IBM Session Manager product will be phased out by the
end of 2018.
They suggest we migrate to IBM CL/Supersession.
I would like to know of other vendor products that do a similar function.
I will be searching but thought of tapping into your experience.
Thank
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 20:23:25 +, Tracy Adams wrote:
>So I am built a new master catalog for the 2.2 migration.
>I have some sys1. Datasets that live on various sms volumes
>that I want add catalog entries to in my new mastcat. If I
>just use IDCAMS define nonvsam I get a good entry but
Not to be to flippant, but why in the heck would you have SYS1 datasets in your
master catalog also SMS managed? Seems like you are creating a nasty
scenario.
But if you have to have this, then REPRO MERGECAT is probably the only solution
I know of to move the entries from one master to the
So I am built a new master catalog for the 2.2 migration. I have some sys1.
Datasets that live on various sms volumes that I want add catalog entries to in
my new mastcat. If I just use IDCAMS define nonvsam I get a good entry but
there is no SMS information. I can't use "recatalog" because
Hello Friends,
Has anyone had any success using (or diagnosing failures) when using the
SMFLIMxx parameter? We have a few CICS and database regions and one unrepentant
job that refuse to run.
Anne R. Adams, CISSP
DTI, Systems Engineering
Sr. Mainframe Services Analyst
302.298.3196
Hi Folks,
A while back, there was a discussion on IBM-Main about how to
access the ECT (Environment Control Table) which is a TSO control block
pointed to by the CPPL (Command Processor Parameter List) pointed to by
Register 1 when a TSO command gets control.
Binyamin Dissen pointed
Just to close the loop on this - we found an obscure latent bug deep inside one
of our components which resulted in the request for excessive memory when very
specific types of data were encountered.
Most users probably wouldn't have had that kind of data, and even those who did
might not
Have you checked the profiles on the CONSOLE class?
Best Regards
Joao Bentes de Jesus
"Do the difficult things while they are easy and do the great things while
they are small. A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single
step."
Laozi
From: Todd Burrell
18 matches
Mail list logo