On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:32:31 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
>>
>> https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/
>> com.ibm.zos.v2r2.izua700/izuprog_API_StartApp.htm
>
>Interesting. But that starts a TSO address space via the ZOSMF
Replying to my own post based on subsequent experiments.
The answer to my question is "Yes, you MUST specify EXACTLY "LRECL" bytes of
output for each line generated by the OUTREC parameter for an FB output file".
Annoying to have to count characters and add "nnX," at the end of each
generated
Being Friday, this is obligatory: https://xkcd.com/1172/
sas
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Jim Mulder wrote:
...
The ESP customer was very insistent that we change the
> implementation to default to old behavior, with a documented option in
> DIAGxx to request new behavior.
...
-
I’m trying to implement AT-TLS for otelnet on z/OS 2.2. I want to share
TN3270U’s personal certificate. PAGENT is up and running. BPXROOT is
assigned to otelnet. AT-TLS has its own Keyring and TN3270U’s personal
cert has been connected. PAGENT owns the AT-TLS Keyring.
It won’t connect sayin
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
> On 27 October 2017 at 13:06, John McKown
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Coming in a bit sideways on this, and from another thread entirely. If I
> > wanted to do z/OS RACF work when I'm logged into a CICS region (though I
> > don't know why), then I th
On 27 October 2017 at 13:06, John McKown
wrote:
>
> Coming in a bit sideways on this, and from another thread entirely. If I
> wanted to do z/OS RACF work when I'm logged into a CICS region (though I
> don't know why), then I think use the zOSMF REST API would be a much better
> way to go. This
Lizzette, I just checked some parms from my last shop that was a very large DB2
shop, 6 LPARS and we had USEZOSV1R9RULES( NO) set
BMC - CONTROL-X product suite - no issues at all . hth's some
Carmen
- Original Message -
From: "Lizette Koehler"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent
I am processing a VB input file with MMDD dates that I need to use to
create a set of JCL to execute an application process for each unique date.
SYNCSORT is giving me "SORTOUT HAS INCOMPATIBLE LRECL" but i do not understand
why.
I am trying to use the OUTFIL CONVERT parameter to generate
FWIW, the service that z/OSMF uses for starting TSO address spaces is:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.ieac100/cea-intro.htm
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> On 10/27/2017
So, my question is, are there any repercussions changing to USEZOSV1R9RULES(
NO) for shop running, lets say z/OS 2.2 + all OEM products up to date with
compatibility?
we're not a large DB2 shop be most of our workload is DB2, DB2 data sharing in
a 3 system sysplex.
any recommendations?
I, we
I implemented the VSM changes in z/OS 1.10. The original implementation
used the new behavior by default, with an undocumented option in DIAGxx to
allow
a customer (under the direction of IBM support) to temporarily revert to
the old
behavior to bypass a latent bug in some application pro
we have the defaults, so
VSM USEZOSV1R9RULES(YES)
MEMDSENQMGMT: DISABLE
Rex
- Original Message -
From: "Lizette Koehler"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 10:36:02 AM
Subject: Question on some z/OS Tuning Parms USEZOSV1R9RULES and MEMDSENQMGT
Dear List
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Jim Mulder wrote:
> The TSO TMP is designed to be attached only by EXEC PGM=IKJEFTxx,
> or by the TSO/E Session Manager (when Session Manager is the EXEC PGM= on
> the logon proc).
> Attaching the TMP by any other program is unsupported.
>
> Attaching the TMP
Hi Lizette -
I would say that we are a fairly large DB2 shop and we are using both of those
functions... that is, USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO) and MEMDSENQMGMT(ENABLE) and we have
been using them since they were first available. I think we may have opened a
PMR for a problem that we initially had with
The TSO TMP is designed to be attached only by EXEC PGM=IKJEFTxx,
or by the TSO/E Session Manager (when Session Manager is the EXEC PGM= on
the logon proc).
Attaching the TMP by any other program is unsupported.
Attaching the TMP in an IMS dependent region or a CICS AOR will
violate the Syst
I appears to me that some are confused by the clumsily named
USZOSV1R9RULES option. Note that you have to set it to NO to get the
new and wonderful behavior.
I really think IBM needs to take some action to bring better awareness
to their customer base of what the myriad function options "should"
On 10/27/2017 10:32 AM, John McKown wrote:
z/OSMF (which we don't run). I was more thinking of a Java package/library
which would run a TSO command in the invoker's address space..
There are many ways to exfoliate a feline. This sorta thing has been my
main interest for some years.
JTOpen
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 08:36:02 -0700, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
>Dear List -
>
>I have been reviewing some parms that have been around in z/OS for a few
>years/decades?
>
>USEZOSV1R9RULES
>
>VSM USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO|YES): YES causes GETMAIN and STORAGE OBTAIN behavior to
>be unchanged from its historic
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> On 10/27/2017 10:07 AM, David Crayford wrote:
>
>> But I
>> don't see any Java library to invoke a TSO command.
>>
>
> https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/
> com.ibm.zos.v2r2.izua700/izuprog_API_StartApp.htm
Int
On 10/27/2017 10:07 AM, David Crayford wrote:
But I
don't see any Java library to invoke a TSO command.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.izua700/izuprog_API_StartApp.htm
--
Jack J. Woehr # Science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way o
Sure.. the JNI portion is unavoidable. But wouldn't it depend on what was
being done?.. is the switch back and forth worse than the whole unit as
regular Rexx. And doesn't the additional capabilities of being able to use
Java / utilities add enough value?
Rob Schramm
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017, 12:0
Posting here and posting on the CICS-Listserv:
Does anyone have a working copy of the CICS exit XMNOUT that would share? I
just want to suppress SMF records from the QMSG transaction.
TIA, Tracy
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / s
Thanks Sri!
I'll check this out. I have saved a link to the most recent DFSORT A.P.G. and
looked at JOINKEYS. At first glance it seems somewhat daunting but I'll study
it and try it out.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On B
Bill,
Here is a DFSORT JOINKEYS job which will give you the desired results
similar to splice
//STEP0100 EXEC PGM=SORT
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//INA DD *
VICKY
FRANK
CARRIE
HOLLY
PAUL
//INB DD *
KAREN
HOLLY
CARRIE
VICKY
MARY
//OUT12DD SYSOUT=*
//OUT1 DD SYSOUT=*
On 28/10/2017 12:02 AM, John McKown wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Rob Schramm wrote:
Has anyone looked or asked the NetRexx guys if there is a way to use TSO
type of commands in NetRexx?
I can't see any way to run a TSO command using NetRexx. But, in a more
general sense, I don't
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Rob Schramm wrote:
> Has anyone looked or asked the NetRexx guys if there is a way to use TSO
> type of commands in NetRexx?
>
I can't see any way to run a TSO command using NetRexx. But, in a more
general sense, I don't see any way to run a TSO command from a
we have this also
VSM USEZOSV1R9RULES(YES)
MEMDSENQMGMT: DISABLE
Carmen
- Original Message -
From: "Lizette Koehler"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 10:36:02 AM
Subject: Question on some z/OS Tuning Parms USEZOSV1R9RULES and MEMDSENQMGT
Dear List -
Lizette,
We have
USEZOSV1R9RULES=YES, but not sure about any effect on performance, because it
has been setup for a while.
MEMDSENQMGMT=DISABLED, so can't help with that one.
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Li
Has anyone looked or asked the NetRexx guys if there is a way to use TSO
type of commands in NetRexx?
Rob Schramm
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017, 11:30 AM David Crayford wrote:
> On 27/10/2017 11:18 PM, John McKown wrote:
> >> Best post in this thread! We want a JIT for classic REXX so it can run
> at
>
Dear List -
I have been reviewing some parms that have been around in z/OS for a few
years/decades?
USEZOSV1R9RULES
VSM USEZOSV1R9RULES(NO|YES): YES causes GETMAIN and STORAGE OBTAIN behavior to
be unchanged from its historic behavior. NO causes GETMAIN and STORAGE OBTAIN
behavior for user-regio
On 27/10/2017 11:18 PM, John McKown wrote:
Best post in this thread! We want a JIT for classic REXX so it can run at
speeds similar to compiled languages.
I'd vote "for" that. Of course, the standard IBM response will be given:
"How much are you willing to pay us to do that?" and "What do yo
Good point, but if you can reduce your REXX CPU using a JIT by at least
a half you don't care about zIIP elibility. The same applies for using
faster languages.
On 27/10/2017 11:16 PM, Martin Packer wrote:
And we didn't discuss zIIP-eligibility...
... It's a bit like compiling REXX...
... D
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:12 AM, David Crayford
wrote:
> On 27/10/2017 9:47 PM, Walt Farrell wrote:
>
>> Did we somehow arrive at a generalized requirement to be able to access
>>> particular TSO/ISPF features from*other* programming languages that are
>>> not REXX, in a discussion about JITs,
And we didn't discuss zIIP-eligibility...
... It's a bit like compiling REXX...
... Don't expect it to buy you much if the things being scripted are heavy
compared to the things scripting them. Effectively the command processors
are JNI.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Syst
On 27/10/2017 9:47 PM, Walt Farrell wrote:
Did we somehow arrive at a generalized requirement to be able to access
particular TSO/ISPF features from*other* programming languages that are
not REXX, in a discussion about JITs, because of the functional utility
some z/OS system programmers desire t
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 08:47:16 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote:
>
>I think we arrived at this idea because someone suggested it would be nice if
>the open-sourced JIT technology that started this thread could be applied to
>REXX. Then someone else said we don't really need that, because NetREXX
>fulfill
Hi Len
We didn't do this kind of migration in the pass but the engine can be adapted
to ZEKE or other scheduler we don't see onetime.
Our need is to have the brochure of the scheduler to migrate and a consultant
with skill on ZEKE.
Best Regards
Philippe TESSIER
>>
>> What about Migrating fr
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 07:39:00 +, Baguley, Nicholas: Absa
wrote:
>When you use PARM andonot SYSTSIN it doesn’t seem to ECHO input/command. I
>tried it before posting so as not to incur wrath of LIST
After John also confirmed that, I thought some more and realized that it
probably works that
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:48:32 +0800, Timothy Sipples wrote:
>Did we somehow arrive at a generalized requirement to be able to access
>particular TSO/ISPF features from *other* programming languages that are
>not REXX, in a discussion about JITs, because of the functional utility
>some z/OS system
What about Migrating from ASG ZEKE & ZEBB to IWS?
Thank You,
Len Sasso
System Administrator
TEAM: Together Everyone Achieves More
RDC - 327 Columbia TPKE, Rensselaer NY 12144-4400
t: +1.518.257.4209 | m: +1.518.894.0879
len.sa...@csra.com | www.csra.com Follow us on Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn
On 10/26/2017 8:21 PM, Longnecker, Dennis wrote:
I miss CA-1. I found it much easier to use than RMM. I am constantly trying
to remember how to find things in RMM that were so simple to find in CA-1.
What I especially miss is the reporting in CA-1. They were so simple to
create. I find th
Agreed, that would be great. I've had a crack at porting ooRexx but the
integration into TSO/ISPF was a major issue. Getting it to work outside
of the z/OS UNIX file system is challenging as it doesn't use fopen().
It also uses threads which may interesting when running in TSO and
especially IS
Hi Nick,
As a way to avoid problems to begin with, does your routine first check to see
if there is an existing user ID or group that matches the ID it is about to
create, that the ID is syntactically correct, and that the default group exists?
What RACF authority is the IMS address space using
Hi List
Wow - thanks for input List
Lots of ideas , suggestions and questions.
When you use PARM and not SYSTSIN it doesn’t seem to ECHO input/command. I
tried it before posting so as not to incur wrath of LIST
Walt - correct.. the userid of the mother task is not authorised to ADDUSER.
The ATT
44 matches
Mail list logo
