Scott Ford wrote:
>I read in the z/Os 2.3 doc that SSH requires the crypto
>card and ICSF.
You did? Here's the link to the current PDF edition of the z/OS OpenSSH
documentation:
https://www-304.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zOSV2R3SC276806/$file/foto100_v2r3.pdf
I don't see
You can see the CBU records in the SE, not the HMC
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jake Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 8:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Querying CBU expiry in HMC
Hi
I have tried navigating various options on
Hi
I have tried navigating various options on HMC to check the expiry of our
CBU and still don't find the option to know the exact date.
Could someone please share the exact option within HMC which can help to
know the date of expiry for CBU ?
Jake
On 7/24/2018 7:12 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
Yeah, touché. S-CON is an assembler thing. EXPAND is a binder thing. Have not
experimented with getting them to work together. Hoping the vendor will fix
this at the source.
You're probably thinking of the ancient technique of assembling S-CONs
IDCAMS PRINT would show logical and physical record boundaries of the dataset.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 6:48 AM Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity I would look at the dump and the DCB that is being used.
>
> Perhaps an overlay?
>
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 12:12:52 -0400 Tony Thigpen wrote:
>
Yeah, touché. S-CON is an assembler thing. EXPAND is a binder thing. Have not
experimented with getting them to work together. Hoping the vendor will fix
this at the source.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
Yes, IBM did an audit of us and the 'point counting tool' is what showed the
discrepancy.
I'm trying to show/prove that my calculation was correct at the time and IBM
changed the rules on me.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Does the 'point counting tool' have any use for your purposes?
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.apsl000/price.htm
In a message dated 7/24/2018 3:03:36 PM Central Standard Time,
ken.porow...@cit.com writes:
I should note that Ricoh bought out IBM's
On my systems the current version of ssh requires ICSF to be active. Not all
systems have crypto cards available. I configured ssh following the book and
have no issues. There were some issues with the type of crypto specified in
the ssh parameters, but removing those "bad" types fixed that.
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 20:17:05 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>Thanks! There's also a trick to create S-type constants with base-displacement
>values to simplify branching into a patch area at the right spot.
>
I don't see this in the description of the EXPAND statement (but I didn't
check the
All:
Sorry for not dropping by earlier , i am swamped supporting code, teaching
,QA-ing
I am researching the following feasibility of using SSH into z/OS but i
have a question.
Do all Z customers run ICSF and the crypto cards ? I read in the z/Os 2.3
doc that SSH requires the crypto card and
Thanks! There's also a trick to create S-type constants with base-displacement
values to simplify branching into a patch area at the right spot.
BTW vendor support sees some comments about a patch area but can't find an
actual one. Like maybe it got omitted and no one ever complained before.
If one has placed an ICF catalog in VLF, is the STRNO still useful or even used?
FIRST TENNESSEE
Confidentiality notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or
the employee or
Not quite but thanks for trying.
The two documents I'm looking for predate the latest method of determining
'printer points' for various printers that then translates into a PSF pricing
tier. All of the Announcement letters and references to the earlier docs point
only to the latest iteration
I used these keywords in Google
PSF Tiered Pricing Exhibit richon
Got this
https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=an=ca=gpateam=897=ENUS214-099
Is this what you are looking for?
IBM Print Services Facility for z/OS, V4.5 delivers Advanced Function
Presentation
Anyone have a more recent copy of Z125-4565-11 PSF Tiered Pricing Exhibit -
Non-IBM.
The -11 is from 2002, I’m looking for one that lists Ricoh printers.
Or possibly an earlier version of Z125-4564-20 PSF Tiered Pricing Exhibit – For
IBM and Non-IBM Printers.
The -20 is from 2006, I’m looking
Went to look at the dump this morning and the programmers had deleted
it. They said: "Changing the JOBLIB statements fixed it so we deleted
the output."
:-(
Tony Thigpen
Binyamin Dissen wrote on 07/24/2018 07:47 AM:
Out of curiosity I would look at the dump and the DCB that is being used.
Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
We have a vendor product for which we previously ZAPped some tailored code into
a patch area. The latest upgrade of the product module does not come with a
patch area. I seem to remember a method of adding a patch area to a module for
which no source is available.
Linkage editor EXPAND?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 12:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Adding a patch area
[External Email]
We have a vendor product for which we previously ZAPped some
Agreed, it looks like the program has blocksize of 9000 hardcoded (had to whip
out my RPG template for that one!)
Dana
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 23:57:54 -0500, Bruce Hewson
wrote:
>Hi Tony,
>
>If RPG has specific BLKSIZE maximums, then SMS autochanging BLKSIZE could
>cause this behaviour.
>
We have a vendor product for which we previously ZAPped some tailored code into
a patch area. The latest upgrade of the product module does not come with a
patch area. I seem to remember a method of adding a patch area to a module for
which no source is available. Using I think ASMH and IEWL.
Among the cards I have, at my desk:
GX20-0406-0 ESA/370 Reference Summary
GX20-0157-0 System/370 Extended Architecture Reference Summary
GX23-0016-1 TSO Extensions Information Center Facility User's Summary
GA27-3125-4 3777 Model 1 Communication Terminal Reference Summary
lol!
I still have my yellow card (GX20-1850-5) given to me by my old boss @ Sears :)
around 1977ish
and a hard copy of both the TSO/E Extensions Command language Ref summary
(GX23-0015-0) and Data Facility HSM V2R6.0 SYPROG command Ref summary
(GX35-5037-6)
just can't seem to give them up.
You don't just use KC for this? ;-(
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Jesse 1 Robinson
wrote:
> Thanks! Looks like I'll need to put 'giant pocket shirts' on my Santa
> Claus list.
>
> .
> .
> J.O.Skip Robinson
> Southern California Edison Company
> Electric Dragon Team Paddler
> SHARE MVS
Thanks! Looks like I'll need to put 'giant pocket shirts' on my Santa Claus
list.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
It's a whole book now, search for "z/Architecture Reference Summary SA22-7871".
HTH
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 11:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
I asked this question a couple years ago for Z/Arch, this is the like I was
provided
https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg29c69415c1e82603c852576700058075a=1
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse 1 Robinson"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent:
A recent Facebook post reminded me of how useful Green/Yellow cards were. Is
there an updated version available? Color altogether optional.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office
ITYM AC(1) and the statement should be that there is no way for an unauthorized
program to make itself authorized, no way to invoke an authorized TSO command,
program or service not permitted by the installation, no way to invoke an
authorized subroutine other than through the TMP interface and
Neither APF authorization nor supervisor state suspend normal SAF processing
for, e.g., OPEN. If you know of a privileged application that bypasses normal
resource controls and does not require SAF authorization before doing so, then
it's APAR time.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
I am just saying that TSO has done a ton of work to move between states and
maintain integrity. It does not seem to apply or be helpful in this
discussion... since it breaks and attempts to maintain integrity at the
same time. There are tons of examples of attempts to break and maintain
The SHARE App is now available and working for St. Louis.
See you there
Russell Witt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Michael Babcock
Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 8:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SHARE App
Out of curiosity I would look at the dump and the DCB that is being used.
Perhaps an overlay?
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 12:12:52 -0400 Tony Thigpen wrote:
:>I have a site with a bunch of old RPG programs. Lately, it seems that
:>sometimes the get the following. Once it happens, they can not get the
I'd say that the questions are not precisely-enough posed.
1)Can a Problem Program (Key 8) attach a Subtask that is authorized ?
2)Can a Problem Program attach a subtask (with the DCB parameter) that is
authorized ? The dcb is not in the steplib concatenation.
3)Can a Problem Program invoke a
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 21:52:53 -0400 Rob Schramm wrote:
:>TSO is NOT a good example. The flipping in and out of authorization has
:>been discussed ad infinitum. Pick something else for discussion points
:>unless we are diverging into what's possible, and there are tons of
:>inadvisable ways to
Supervisor state does not automatically bypass security. An authorized routine
can play around to do it, but standard code will not.
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 20:46:54 -0500 Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
:>On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 22:53:59 +, Seymour J Metz
Brian,
Do any of the other WHEN options work in lieu of SYSID? For example, WHEN
(TERMINAL...) seems like it might be viable, provided of course the test
LPAR user is coming in through one of a set of named terminal IDs and that
those terminal IDs are only available in/to the test LPAR -- no
37 matches
Mail list logo
