Mounif,
I am unable to comment on any 'increase' of the CP utilization. CPACF has been
around for a very long time. Both the systems you mention have the CPACF
function. You will need a no charge feature (not available for embargoed
countries) for microcode to enable CPACF. The other key point
I'm installing new CPC, z14, with HMC 2.14.0
Working on HMC directly I am able to use Single Object Operations (that
means: connect to SE).
However when I connect do HMC remotely the SOO attempt ends with the
following error message:
(from the browser, note it is free translation from polish)
Use ACSADMIN Userid and under user management allow the IP which you want
to connect
On Tue 14 Aug, 2018, 1:49 PM R.S., wrote:
> I'm installing new CPC, z14, with HMC 2.14.0
> Working on HMC directly I am able to use Single Object Operations (that
> means: connect to SE).
> However when I conne
W dniu 2018-08-10 o 08:46, Peter pisze:
Hi
Apology for the dummy query
Is it really required for tape drives ficons have to go via San switch ? Or
it can be connected directly ? Any particular reason if it has to be via
SAN switch ?
It depends.
For TS3500 with TS1140 you will have SAN switch
Do you have firewall open for all the ports needed? According to FM:
tcp 9960 - Browser applet communication
tcp 9950-9959 - Proxy support for Single Object Operation
Dana
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 11:48:58 +0200, R.S. wrote:
>I'm installing new CPC, z14, with HMC 2.14.0
>Working on HMC directly I
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 23:07:51 +, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
>No feature tests in the header file. As long as the header hasn't already
>been used it unconditionally defines the data areas and the function
>prototypes.
>
>I'd accept feature test macro(s) as a reasonable alternative as long a
Indeed. As the XLC/C++ Users Guide states:
__IBM_METAL__ is predefined to 1 when METAL is in effect.
But the Binder API header __iew_api.h does not test it.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent:
I believe that the real issue is that the binder api is packaged as a DLL,
and AFAIK you need to run under LE and use LE/"C" linkage conventions to
call it.
Consider writing an RFC for "*z/OS MVS Program Management: Advanced
Facilities" *to clarify whether Metal C is supported with the C/C++ DLL
Bi
Hi Kirk,
The existing API header has all the C definitions needed to use the API in C
(Metal or not) so no EDCDSECT processing is needed, but the header also
includes all the function prototypes, which as we both pointed out are packaged
in a DLL and unusable at present from vanilla MetalC prog
Kirk Wolf wrote:
I believe that the real issue is that the binder api is packaged as a DLL,
and AFAIK you need to run under LE and use LE/"C" linkage conventions to
call it.
Consider writing an RFC for "*z/OS MVS Program Management: Advanced
Facilities" *to clarify whether Metal C is supported w
Starting yesterday, all the Book Manager/Library Server libs I know of
(publibz.boulder..., publibfp.boulder..., publibfp.dhe, etc) respond with:
"Forbidden: You don't have permission to access on this server".
This includes links provide *by IBM*, such as all the doc links given here:
http://i
I would like to reiterate David Crawford's question: why use Metal C
instead of the complete C?
Metal C is intended for writing exits and small routines where full
functionality isn't needed. It is a crippled C environment, and while you
may enjoy pushing it to its limits and beyond, you should a
For the archives, I have replied privately to Steve and David on their
question, as I am not in a position to discuss it publicly.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Steve Smith
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 6:34
On 14 August 2018 at 17:29, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> The actual IEWBIND interface is just a normal system interface,
> no LE required.
>
> For example, the code to start the session with the binder is:
>
>...
> val = 0x4040;
> code = (IEWBIND_STARTD << 16 | IEWBIND_VERSION);
>
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 20:33:51 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
>
>... A good many years ago (and long before the C interface
>existed) I realized that it's quite possible to invoke IEWBIND from
>REXX using Address LINKPGM. Not efficient, but it can be useful for
>making little tools such as an eyecatcher
John Eells link works for me.
https://www.ibm.com/software/shopzseries/ShopzSeries_public.wss
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 4:42 AM John Eells wrote:
> farmall...@gmail.com wrote:
> > So what is the new url for shopz? I start at https://ibm.com and go
> through menus to support, etc and get auth fa
Wot no COBOL?
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 4:46 AM Mark Regan wrote:
> https://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1333572
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark T. Regan
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruction
On 15/08/2018 6:34 AM, Steve Smith wrote:
I would like to reiterate David Crawford's question: why use Metal C
instead of the complete C?
That would be Crayford :)
Metal C is intended for writing exits and small routines where full
functionality isn't needed. It is a crippled C environment,
On 15/08/2018 11:20 AM, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
Wot no COBOL?
COBOL is #39 [1]. Java and C# dominate the enterprise these days.
[1]
https://spectrum.ieee.org/static/interactive-the-top-programming-languages-2018
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 4:46 AM Mark Regan wrote:
https://www.eetimes.com/d
>> Wot no COBOL?
>COBOL is #39 [1]. Java and C# dominate the enterprise these days.
Doesn't this nicely prove how worthless such surveys are? Go ask the same
question to the mainframe community, and you will get a completely different
ranking. Go ask the same question to the app programmer com
On 15/08/2018 12:34 PM, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
Wot no COBOL?
COBOL is #39 [1]. Java and C# dominate the enterprise these days.
Doesn't this nicely prove how worthless such surveys are? Go ask the same
question to the mainframe community, and you will get a completely different
ranking. Go ask
Hi
Any documentation or manual which can help me to identify the free ports in
DS8K boxes ?
Regards
Jake
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message:
22 matches
Mail list logo
