Re: load library lrecl=??

On 2018-09-05, at 21:49:56, Mike Schwab wrote: > I am guessing the LRECL-256 is handy when reading the directory? > You still need to override to DSORG=PS. > The loader handles reading the actual programs. -- gil -- For

Re: load library lrecl=??

I am guessing the LRECL-256 is handy when reading the directory? The loader handles reading the actual programs. On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:41 PM Brian Westerman wrote: > > Hi, > > I had an "interesting" conversation today. Apparently some of the libraries > shipped by some vendors or at least

load library lrecl=??

Hi, I had an "interesting" conversation today. Apparently some of the libraries shipped by some vendors or at least the directions to define them specify RECFM=U,LRECL=256. I had never considered LRECL as an valid option when defining a load library and so always coded RECFM=U,LRECL=0. Is

Re: VSAM share-option 4

You may want to look at CA Shareoption5. I know that was used in a VSE->z/OS migration in a past life, and seem to recall it was something to do with addressing online & batch concurrency/integrity. On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 23:24, Mark Waterbury < 01c3f560aac1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>

Re: VSAM share-option 4

Who said SVS did not have VSAM? SVS certainly did have VSAM ... It was an ICR -- Independent Component Release -- so somewhat tricky to get it installed into SVS, but once installed, it did work... and CICS/VS used it ... This was on SVS 1.7 circa 1976-77... And, just like on MVS, on SVS, we

Re: "Library Server" Access Now "Forbidden"?

Hi all, I just received another update on this issue with the hosted Library Server (BookManager site). I can assure you that Claus doesn't have any special insider knowledge - the site wasn't 'CLOSED DOWN' and its temporary offline status was indeed not planned. Nothing has changed - the

Re: VSAM share-option 4

Ah good ol' SVS, the red-headed stepchild, the rented mule, the forgotten step-sister of Cinderella, the Spam & powdered eggs puree. It don't get no respect. sas On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:35 AM Seymour J Metz wrote: > > > VSAM was implemented at the OS level with DOS/VS (and IIRC, > > DOS/VS

Re: Auto backup of zfs

As I stated. If you use DFDSS, it will quiesce the zfs file, making it unavailable during the time of the backup. All work needs to be stopped against a zFS in order to back it up. Otherwise you could have a corrupted backup. As others have pointed out Lizette > -Original Message-

Re: Measuring Usage of zIIP per address space

The SMF30 Processor Accounting Section is a good place for the total and zIIP processor consumption but if you are also interested in the delay aspects you won't find anything in SMF30. For delay information you can turn to RMF Mon III, or just use the postprocessor reports with report classes

Re: Zowe for systems programmer ?

Jerry Callen jcal...@narsil.org via ua.edu 13:38 (34 minutes ago) to IBM-MAIN On Sun, Sep 2, 2018, 9:56 AM Bruce Armstrong wrote: > If you know what ISPF is and are happy with it you may not be the > target market for Zowe. Zowe is

Re: (Very) old HMC versions

W dniu 2018-09-04 o 14:38, Allan Staller pisze: Resource Link? Neither Resource Link, nor bitsavers or google or... -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland == Jeśli nie jesteś adresatem tej wiadomości: - powiadom nas o tym w

Re: Zowe for systems programmer ?

I agree that programmers should adopt tools from other platforms, but only when they are appropriate tools for the job at hand, not simply because they are in style. A good hammer is an essential tool, but it's a terrible screwdriver. When it comes to configuration control and serialization

Re: Zowe for systems programmer ?

On Sun, Sep 2, 2018, 9:56 AM Bruce Armstrong wrote: > If you know what ISPF is and are happy with it you may not be the > target market for Zowe. Zowe is primarily targeted for the "next gen" > sysprog who does not have 30+ years of learning the the nuances of > z/OS and ISPF. Or - maybe

Re: Auto backup of zfs

See the zFS Admin book for the proper way to back up a zFS dataset. If the zFS is mounted TOL(ENQF) is NOT recommended. Further, it should be backed up from the same system where it’s mounted (I can’t remember if that still applies if you are using zFS sysplex sharing). In the past, I’ve had

Measuring Usage of zIIP per address space

To all zIIP gurus, I have read Martin Packer's SHARE presentation and the thread 'Why are highly busy zIIPs worse than highly busy CPs?' in June 2018 amongst other things like Google searches, SMF and RMF books. I want to know how can I see (from SMF records 30 according to Martin Packer and

SOF dispatcher manual IBM(00-5798)

Hi Does anyone have manuals of SOF dispatcher ? It's an IBM product once The module are all starting with CREx Any suggestions would be much appreciated Peter -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access