No.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ieaa500/ieaa500102.htm
Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp.
Poughkeepsie NY
> We just ran out of non-reusable ASID and don't have an IPL scheduled
> for another week. We have plenty of
Yes.
Michael Brennan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Nai, Dean
Sent: 19 August 2019 14:01
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: non-reusable ASID
We just ran out of non-reusable ASID and don't have an IPL scheduled for
another week. We have plenty
On Aug 19, 2019, at 3:30 PM, TenEyck, Peter
wrote:
>
> I to struggled to find documentation to answer Dave's question on the
> MIGRATABLE attribute. Where is the MIGRATABLE attribute documented? I would
> like to see it…
There’s some documentation in “z/OS MVS Program Management: User's
I to struggled to find documentation to answer Dave's question on the
MIGRATABLE attribute. Where is the MIGRATABLE attribute documented? I would
like to see it...
It's not really a COBOL thing right? It's just a flag if a "member" can be
copied from PDS to PDSE or perhaps PDSE to PDS?
I saw
Thank you Curtis (and the several others who concurred with Curtis).
This is what people here were thinking,
and certainly it makes good sense.
I was hoping to get a definitive link
(or response from an IBMer),
but this consensus is confirmation enough.
Thank You,
Dave
At 8/19/2019 02:26
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 14:41, Mark Jacobs
<0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> That attribute was also set on a load module I just created too, so what
> Curtis said makes sense to me. The load module/program object can
> exist in ether format depending on where it's stored.
COBOL 5 and 6 generate OBJECTS. They can't be copied to PDSs. Cobol
4 created Load Modules and can be copied into PDSEs.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 2:25 PM TenEyck, Peter
wrote:
>
> Not sure about the COBOL connection...
>
> Is the setting of MIGRATABLE attribute by the binder related to binder
Not sure about the COBOL connection...
Is the setting of MIGRATABLE attribute by the binder related to binder setting
COMPAT= ? I do "think" it indicates the ability to copy PDSE to PDS.
//* Peter Ten Eyck
//* Senior Systems Programmer
//* American National
//
-Original Message-
From:
Using you favorite way of looking at health checks find the value for
IEA_ASIDS. For instance in SDSF you can use CK command. It will tell you how
many days until you run out. You will be surprised how long a period it will
actually be.
Doug
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:00:38 +, Nai, Dean
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 18:54:13 +, Jon Perryman wrote:
> Paul, the iana.org time database is one of many attempts at solving the time
> issue. Databases and other multi-user products have their own implementations
> to deal with their specific situation. Mysql is open source so you can see
>
We just ran out of non-reusable ASID and don't have an IPL scheduled for
another week. We have plenty of reusable ASID left. Will things that used all
the non-reusable ASID like DB2IRLM just use the reusable ones when they get
recycled?
Dean Nai
>
Paul, the iana.org time database is one of many attempts at solving the time
issue. Databases and other multi-user products have their own implementations
to deal with their specific situation. Mysql is open source so you can see
their implementation.
For the difficult situations, we just
Hi:
It was always difficult for me to find materials about SIE ...
A nice source of data I found was the Linux Kernel sources, because of KVM ...
It is nice to see for example how the instructions starting with a B2 opcode
are intercepted It is good to understand how the job is actually
Generated by COBOL 5+, as one example. Long names.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.idad400/d4289.htm
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 1:26 PM Pew, Curtis G
wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Dave Cole wrote:
> >
> > 1) When a Program Object is
That attribute was also set on a load module I just created too, so what Curtis
said makes sense to me. The load module/program object can exist in ether
format depending on where it's stored.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
Have you looked at CBTTAPE.ORG to see if this already exists? Maybe the PDS
command does something like this that you can adapt to your needs.
Jon.
On Monday, August 19, 2019, 07:46:44 AM PDT, Kirk Wolf
wrote:
So I know how to do this with BPAM, but I have a case where I would like to
On Aug 19, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Dave Cole wrote:
>
> 1) When a Program Object is MIGRATABLE, what can it be migrated from? What
> can it be migrated to?
My understanding is that a MIGRATABLE Program Object can be copied to a PDS
load library where it becomes a load module. (Program Objects live
A question has come up regarding something called the MIGRATABLE
attribute that the Binder can assign to a program object. It's not an
attribute that the user can assign, only the binder can assign it in
response to its own analysis of the structure and needs of the Object.
My question is,
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:09:22 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>>> ...
>>> // set the time zone offset and apply the leap second offset
>>> int64_t ldto = cvt->cvtext2->cvtldto - cvt->cvtext2->cvtlso + adjust;
>>>
>> Is this intended to be used with localtime() and strftime()? Localtime()
>
> Or is it DSORG?
No. There is a bit in the JFCB (JFCBIND1,JFCPDS) that indicates whether
JFCBELNM contains a member name.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:46:03 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>So I know how to do this with BPAM, but I have a case where I would like to
>use QSAM to add or replace a member of a PDS or PDSE.I want to use BLDL
>an STOW in order to process ISPF statistics.
>...
>3) DD question: I think that having
If you're not intimately familiar with the now undocumented QSAM logic, then
trying to mix FIND/NOTE/STOW with QSAM is dicey and you're better off using
BPAM. I've done it, but it's not for the inexperienced.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
I seem to recall getting part way down this road years ago and reaching the
same conclusion.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Steve Smith
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 9:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
On 8/19/2019 7:40 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Lots of possibilities for what one can do. Something to bear in mind its a
“virtualized” guest so I/O performance will be less than native zLinux
performance. I haven’t seen any good data on the actual differences in
performance but that would be
I've never seen nor heard of an IHADCB
macro, as of z/OS 2.4. Did you mean one should just create it?
Well, that's embarrassing. Bad assumption on my part. There is such a
macro, but it's apparently not shipped externally.
The assembler part consists of
MACRO
IHADCB =,=
DCBD
If you use STOW with QSAM you're on your own; it's a lot of work to get it
right. BTDT,GTS.
Look at http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3/source/STOWBLDL.ASM if you're really brave.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe
I've recently done some similar programming. After some false starts, I
decided it was easier to just use BPAM for the output.
One gotcha... OPEN for input will abend if the member name doesn't exist,
even with DSORG=PO. So, I had to modify the JFCB to allow that (and
JFCNWRIT on!).
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:41 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> IBM assumes that your program will only use STOW for MACRF=W. CLOSE does
> use STOW for DSORG=PO,MACRF=P[M], but only after doing some housekeeping
> that is not documented.
>
The documentation seems inconsistent in "Using Data sets" /
What about licensing issues?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Peter
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 7:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Linux address space on z/OS
IBM assumes that your program will only use STOW for MACRF=W. CLOSE does use
STOW for DSORG=PO,MACRF=P[M], but only after doing some housekeeping that is
not documented.
You get the TTR of the member from DCBRELAD. If you need to include user TTRs,
do a NOTE after the relevant CHECK.
Yes, you
> Well, I think stories of overwriting PDS directories with IEBGENER are legend
ITYM legion; it's no legend, although IBM fixed it a long time ago.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf
On 2019-08-20 12:46 AM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
1) This is confusing, since I had thought that I couldn't use MACRF=PM with
DSORG=PO. But with DSORG=PS, I don't think that I can use STOW. But,
under "STOW - Update the Directory", it says that you can. Maybe I need
to use DSORG=PS?
I read that
So I know how to do this with BPAM, but I have a case where I would like to
use QSAM to add or replace a member of a PDS or PDSE.I want to use BLDL
an STOW in order to process ISPF statistics.
I've been reading "Using Data Sets" / "Creating a PDS Member with BSAM or
QSAM", and it is still a
Lots of possibilities for what one can do. Something to bear in mind its a
“virtualized” guest so I/O performance will be less than native zLinux
performance. I haven’t seen any good data on the actual differences in
performance but that would be interesting.
Matt Hogstrom
m...@hogstrom.org
I doubt it. You would need to get your hands on an Oracle container(do they
even exist?) compiled on Linux for z.
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 14:06, Peter wrote:
> Cool so we can run oracle on top of it ?
>
> On Mon, 19 Aug, 2019, 2:57 PM Mike Shorkend,
> wrote:
>
> > zCX workloads are ZIIP
See announcement letter 219-344 https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/4/897/ENUS219-344/index.html_locale=en>,
of July 23, 2019:
https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/4/897/ENUS219-344/index.html_locale=en
Go to the "Ordering
End of Sept. 2019
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Peter
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2019 2:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: zOS 2.4 availablity ?
Hi Group,
When can we expect zOS 2.4 serverpac to be available in shopz ?
Regards
Peter
Cool so we can run oracle on top of it ?
On Mon, 19 Aug, 2019, 2:57 PM Mike Shorkend,
wrote:
> zCX workloads are ZIIP eligible. No IFLs involved.
>
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 10:11, Jake Anderson
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > How are the Linux workload are going to be handled within zOS, will there
zCX workloads are ZIIP eligible. No IFLs involved.
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 10:11, Jake Anderson
wrote:
> Hi
>
> How are the Linux workload are going to be handled within zOS, will there
> be a IFL to offload only Linux workload from zOS ? As getting into general
> CP is going to squeeze the
We are beginning the process to build the agenda for the next Large Systems
Working Group WebEx.
This event will be held on 25th September 2019 at 14:00 GMT
If you would like to present at this event, please send the following to Leanne
Wilson(lean...@rsmpartners.com):
* Your
On 2019-08-19 12:41 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I once wrote some C code that sets the TZ, _TZ variables from the time
zone offset, leap second offset values in the CVT.
...
// set the time zone offset and apply the leap second offset
int64_t ldto = cvt->cvtext2->cvtldto -
Hi
How are the Linux workload are going to be handled within zOS, will there
be a IFL to offload only Linux workload from zOS ? As getting into general
CP is going to squeeze the performance in general.
Jake.
On Mon, 29 Jul, 2019, 1:54 PM Mark Hiscock, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If you want to
42 matches
Mail list logo
