Re: IBM snew DOC Web SIte

2021-04-08 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 02:25:39 +, kekronbekron wrote: >Another point - PDF downloads exist but it's not helpful to have an index.html >that is literally just a table of PDF names and links. >What would be perfect is if I can search across the whole repo of PDFs via a >search in the index.html

Re: LISTCAT for a VTOC

2021-04-08 Thread kekronbekron
You can also use ISPF services in REXX, or via ISPF batch. LMDINIT then LMDLIST, where LMDLIST allows you to scope by wildcard or volume. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, April 9, 2021 7:52 AM, David Spiegel wrote: > Hi John, Bob, > Please see File 112, the VTOC Command

Re: IBM snew DOC Web SIte

2021-04-08 Thread kekronbekron
Another point - PDF downloads exist but it's not helpful to have an index.html that is literally just a table of PDF names and links. What would be perfect is if I can search across the whole repo of PDFs via a search in the index.html file. Something like CA had when we downloaded their

Re: LISTCAT for a VTOC

2021-04-08 Thread David Spiegel
Hi John, Bob, Please see File 112, the VTOC Command Processor. (In 1999, I had the honour of extending it to allow for 4-digit device addresses and other things). Regards, David On 2021-04-08 21:36, John McKown wrote: In TSO, I use ISPF option 3.4 with no DSN and something in the VOLUME. In

Re: LISTCAT for a VTOC

2021-04-08 Thread Bob Bridges
Yeah, this is for a REXX, so I guess IEHLIST is what I need. Thanks, John. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313 /* The enemy will always tell you the cost of following the will of God -- but he will never tell you the cost of NOT following the will of God. -Henry

Re: LISTCAT for a VTOC

2021-04-08 Thread Gibney, Dave
Also, ADRDSSU DUMP, with the NORUN (or however the test, don't do option is specified) > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On > Behalf Of John McKown > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2021 6:36 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: LISTCAT for a VTOC > > In

Re: LISTCAT for a VTOC

2021-04-08 Thread John McKown
In TSO, I use ISPF option 3.4 with no DSN and something in the VOLUME. In batch, I use IEHLIST LISTVTOC. I think there is TSO command on the CBTTabe somewhere that does a TSO LISTVTOC. On Thu, Apr 8, 2021, 20:29 Bob Bridges wrote: > I'm gonna kick myself, I just know I am, but if I know the

LISTCAT for a VTOC

2021-04-08 Thread Bob Bridges
I'm gonna kick myself, I just know I am, but if I know the answer to this already I can't dredge it up. I want to list all the datasets on a particular DASD volume. I'd use LISTCAT LVL('hlq'), but these are not catalogued. Where's the TSO command for that? --- Bob Bridges,

Re: ICHPWX01 password exit source circa 1993

2021-04-08 Thread Charles Mills
> I'll probably just take it out There is no harm in doing so, provided (a..) your RACF SETROPTS PASSWORD RULES fully express the limits you wish to enforce; and (b.) your auditors are content with that. No user is going to be discombobulated because a password that used to fail your exit no

MCS LPARs

2021-04-08 Thread Radoslaw Skorupka
I'm looking for any documentation or presentation explaining "secrets" of MCS partitions. To explain: few years ago new LPAR was introduced. The name is MCS_1 and the purpose is to allow dynamic hardware configuration definition updates on standalone CF machine. This LPAR is explicitly

Re: ICHPWX01 password exit source circa 1993

2021-04-08 Thread Radoslaw Skorupka
W dniu 08.04.2021 o 22:36, Richard Pace pisze: Our system (z/OS 2.4) is running with an old RACF password exit, ICHPWX01, assembly date 01/11/93. Eyecatcher looks like this: ICHPWX01 E9202 01/11/93 16.25 RACF 1.9 We don't have the source code, and it's abending on our z/OS 2.4 system. I'll

ICHPWX01 password exit source circa 1993

2021-04-08 Thread Richard Pace
Our system (z/OS 2.4) is running with an old RACF password exit, ICHPWX01, assembly date 01/11/93. Eyecatcher looks like this: ICHPWX01 E9202 01/11/93 16.25 RACF 1.9 We don't have the source code, and it's abending on our z/OS 2.4 system. I'll probably just take it out; it's long past its

Re: IBM snew DOC Web SIte

2021-04-08 Thread Carmen Vitullo
Late to the party here, but I have to ask, now that KC is rebranded what happens to my local KC server, and my ability to serve up docs to my local customers? there was a way to download old doc using an IBM GUI tool to my server, is this still a solution? is the KC server and content I have

Re: IBM snew DOC Web SIte

2021-04-08 Thread Robert Garrett
LOL - "Intuitive" - perhaps if you're the person who wrote this abomination. I didn't think it was possible for there to be a doc tool that I hated more, or was harder to find information in, than KC. IBM just proved me wrong about that. I had just finally gotten familiar with using the

Re: IBM snew DOC Web SIte

2021-04-08 Thread Colin Paice
There may be no need for documentation as it was expected to be intuitive! It would be nice if they had a permanent search box open, rather than click the eye glass and then enter the data. One reason it may be slow is I've seen it do 8 TLS handshakes as part of getting a page. It goes and tells

Re: IBM snew DOC Web SIte

2021-04-08 Thread Robert Garrett
Yes, it's HORRIBLY slow and there's no doc on how to use it that I've found so far. It is possible to scope searches, but you have to first perform a search and get some results to be able to set the scope because the only place the scope option is available is at the top of the search results

Re: STC JESYSMSG Quandry

2021-04-08 Thread Rob Scott
My suggestion here is to raise a case/incident with IBM JES2. The fact that the message appears when the job ends, but is not viewable while active suggests that there might be a “JES-reason” why this is happening and their L2/3 may well know what that is. Failing there being an existing known

Re: z/OS 1.12 ssh to LInux

2021-04-08 Thread Kirk Wolf
I should have been more clear: The newer linux openssh server *could* support host key algorithms like ssh-rsa, ssh-dsa, but it doesn't have any of those configured. Kirk Wolf Dovetailed Technologies http://dovetail.com On 4/8/21 8:09 AM, Kirk Wolf wrote: The linux server is pretty new

Re: Ficon director and SAN switch

2021-04-08 Thread Chris Hoelscher
I prefer a peanut butter and jelly SAN SWITCH Chris Hoelscher Lead Sys DBA IBM Global Technical Services on assignmemt to Humana Inc. T 502.476.2538 or 502.407.7266 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Radoslaw Skorupka Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021

Re: STC JESYSMSG Quandry

2021-04-08 Thread Mark Jacobs
AFAIK it's transparent to the user. JES2 compresses/decompresses data written/read to/from each track group. It's completely optional. The zEDC Integrated Accelerator must be available on the system where JES2 is to perform SPOOL compression, and ADVANCED_FORMAT=YES needs to be specified in the

Re: STC JESYSMSG Quandry

2021-04-08 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2021-04-08, at 07:01:20, John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote: > > Not sure if it really makes a difference, but I noticed that one of the > SYSOUT classes, A I think, had COMPRESS=YES and the class K had COMPRESS=NO. > Does the SDSF Rexx interface using a dynamically DDNAME uncompress on-the-fly?

Re: IBM snew DOC Web SIte

2021-04-08 Thread Allan Staller
Or is that s**k a** -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of kekronbekron Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 9:07 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM snew DOC Web SIte [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the

Re: Ficon director and SAN switch

2021-04-08 Thread Radoslaw Skorupka
W dniu 07.04.2021 o 18:38, Jake Anderson pisze: Hello We are in process of getting new virtual tape solution to replace an existing one. Solution is to get the channel connected to two ficon directors.and connect them virtual tape. So the question is instead of ficon director can we use the

Re: IBM snew DOC Web SIte

2021-04-08 Thread kekronbekron
Pretty sure it'll kick ass - https://www.infoq.com/news/2020/06/rust-webassembly-fulltext-search/ - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, April 8, 2021 7:26 PM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > From what little I know, a fair amount of

Re: IBM snew DOC Web SIte

2021-04-08 Thread kekronbekron
>From what little I know, a fair amount of processing (per-user) can be pushed >to the client-side with WASM. So I'm with you when you say it's potentially server-side delay/slowness. WASM should help push some of that processing to the client/browser.

Re: Meta languages [was: RE: Assembler Language Programming for IBM System z Servers]

2021-04-08 Thread Charles Mills
Let me see if I can say this in a few words. You study a language, C++ in this case, and they of course say "here is this very rudimentary programming problem, and look, here is how you solve it with templates." A student comes away thinking "every rudimentary problem, the answer is templates"

Re: STC JESYSMSG Quandry

2021-04-08 Thread Mark Jacobs
Yea. Not relevant to this problem. We don't have compression hardware on this system so it's not enabled there. Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com ‐‐‐ Original Message

Re: z/OS 1.12 ssh to LInux

2021-04-08 Thread Kirk Wolf
The linux server is pretty new (OpenSSH 8.4) and only supports the following host key algorithms: debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: rsa-sha2-512,rsa-sha2-256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ssh-ed25519 an old OpenSSH 5.0 client won't support any of these. Kirk Wolf Dovetailed Technologies http://dovetail.com

Re: STC JESYSMSG Quandry

2021-04-08 Thread John S. Giltner, Jr.
Not sure if it really makes a difference, but I noticed that one of the SYSOUT classes, A I think, had COMPRESS=YES and the class K had COMPRESS=NO. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email

Re: Questions regarding thruput expectations of CA-View(SAR)

2021-04-08 Thread Allan Staller
When was the last time a SAR DB reorg was performed? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of A T & T Management Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 9:10 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Questions regarding thruput expectations of CA-View(SAR)

Re: Questions regarding thruput expectations of CA-View(SAR)

2021-04-08 Thread Edgington, Jerry
Glenn, One thing I have found over the years, with SAR, is the TIOT. Most of the time, when I hear about slowdowns with SAR, it is because the backup accessing the TIOT, including User logons. Just my thoughts. Thanks, Jerry Edgington -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion

Re: IBM snew DOC Web SIte

2021-04-08 Thread Martin Packer
I'm not happy with the performance, either, judging by my experience this morning. But 7 seconds doesn't sound like a client side issue. Cheers, Martin Martin Packer WW z/OS Performance, Capacity and Architecture, IBM Technology Sales +44-7802-245-584 email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com Twitter

Re: IBM snew DOC Web SIte

2021-04-08 Thread Colin Paice
Yes, On Sunday firefox said 7 seconds to load a file On Thu, Apr 8, 2021, 10:11 Martin Packer wrote: > I'm not really affiliated with the docs people but I have to ask: Are you > sure this is client-side that's slow? Could well be server side or > network. WASM, while fine, might not be

Re: Meta languages [was: RE: Assembler Language Programming for IBM System z Servers]

2021-04-08 Thread David Crayford
On 6/04/2021 9:53 pm, Charles Mills wrote: You don't use templates I certainly do use templates. Not sure how you get "don't use templates" from what I wrote. Heck, I *over* used templates in the first large C++ project I ever did, and boy, does that make a mess! Now I think I am down to a

z/OS Java 11 coming anytime soon?

2021-04-08 Thread David Crayford
Does anybody have idea when we can expect Java 11 to be GA on z/OS. IBM have made a statement of direction and I heard from IBMers from Hursley that it was supposed to GA in 2020. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive

Re: IBM snew DOC Web SIte

2021-04-08 Thread Martin Packer
I'm not really affiliated with the docs people but I have to ask: Are you sure this is client-side that's slow? Could well be server side or network. WASM, while fine, might not be relevant. Cheers, Martin Martin Packer WW z/OS Performance, Capacity and Architecture, IBM Technology Sales