On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 20:59:11 +, Schmitt, Michael wrote:
>Thanks, I overlooked the "interacting with JES topic".
>
>Looks like you can GET (receive) sysout but not PUT.
>
>I suppose a worst case solution would be to wrap the output in JCL, where the
>JCL executes code to build LRECL=133 lines
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 16:10:37 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 19:50:43 +, Mark Jacobs
>wrote:
>
>>So nothing more than that. IMHO it doesn't seem too worthwhile in most
>>environments. Thanks however.
>>
>>Mark Jacobs
>>
>
>I agree. I never did it except in sandbox
I'm going for the bonus points: NJE/RJE. I was just reading on
this by accident while working on a tool to do a JES3 to JES2
migration (JOBs, not the sysprog work, not that far into AI yet
;-) ).
So there is a way to do that between those nodes.
Steve Thompson
On 9/22/2023 4:25 PM,
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 19:50:43 +, Mark Jacobs
wrote:
>So nothing more than that. IMHO it doesn't seem too worthwhile in most
>environments. Thanks however.
>
>Mark Jacobs
>
I agree. I never did it except in sandbox environments and usually wait a
couple of
releases for changing things
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 04:50:23PM -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote:
> Micheal
>
> Thanks for looking at it I see 8E76D0 at IQETCB
Oh, I mangled it when aliging the hex data, the 0s are from the 64 bit address
high word...
--
For
I don’t know where the build JCL came from cuz it was here before I got
here. I’ll keep that in mind too, thanks!
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 2:35 PM Mark Zelden wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 06:50:01 -0500, Michael Babcock
> wrote:
>
> >Thanks Rob! That’s the explanation I needed! However, I
NJE over TCP/IP.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Schmitt, Michael
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2023 4:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: TCP/IP to JES3
Is there a way to transfer sysout type data from a remote, non-mainframe
Thanks, I overlooked the "interacting with JES topic".
Looks like you can GET (receive) sysout but not PUT.
I suppose a worst case solution would be to wrap the output in JCL, where the
JCL executes code to build LRECL=133 lines from instream data and then copy
that to SYSOUT.
We used to
Micheal
Thanks for looking at it I see 8E76D0 at IQETCB
+0 (4) link
+4 (4) 00026A6C IQEPARAM
+8 (4) 008AA7a8 IQEIRB
+c (4) IQETCB
why isn't IQETCB set? I see 8E76D0 at that location
I am begging to think that because I am running under TESTAUTH the IRB is
getting
Try FTP with filetype=jes
Lionel B. Dyck <
Website: www.lbdsoftware.com
Sent from my iPhone 15 Pro
Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what you
are, reputation merely what others think you are." - John Wooden
> On Sep 22, 2023, at 3:26 PM, Schmitt, Michael
RJE3780?
https://github.com/wa6our/RJE3780
https://www.cq-comm.com/3780.htm
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 3:26 PM Schmitt, Michael
wrote:
>
> Is there a way to transfer sysout type data from a remote, non-mainframe
> system, into a JES3 spool? From which already existing tasks will grab the
> output
Is there a way to transfer sysout type data from a remote, non-mainframe
system, into a JES3 spool? From which already existing tasks will grab the
output according to destination, class, writer, etc.
Such as, use some product or capability to connect and transfer to a TCP/IP
port.
Most of
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 01:58:00PM -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote:
> I am posting my code in addition to some displays I captured as I am getting
> the feeling my IRB was not dispatched for some reason
>
> So here is the code in my STIMER routine from where I issue the SCHEDIRB
> pointing to the
So nothing more than that. IMHO it doesn't seem too worthwhile in most
environments. Thanks however.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
--- Original Message ---
On
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 16:30:31 +, Mark Jacobs
wrote:
>I know what the risks are in moving the ASVT into 31 bit storage, but I don't
>see any benefits. Can someone enlighten me?
>
>Mark Jacobs
>
Isn't it obvious? Slightly more 24-bit storage for programs needing below the
line private.
On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 06:50:01 -0500, Michael Babcock
wrote:
>Thanks Rob! That’s the explanation I needed! However, I did create a
>ISF*.** profile with a UACC of ALTER but it still didn’t work because I
>didn’t have NOFAILRC4 (I assume).
>
>On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 2:52 AM Rob Scott wrote:
>
Hi
I am posting my code in addition to some displays I captured as I am getting
the feeling my IRB was not dispatched for some reason
So here is the code in my STIMER routine from where I issue the SCHEDIRB
pointing to the IQE generated by the CIRB
STIMER DS 0D
I know what the risks are in moving the ASVT into 31 bit storage, but I don't
see any benefits. Can someone enlighten me?
Mark Jacobs
Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com), Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
Thanks for that Kurt!
Dave Jousma
Vice President | Director, Technology Engineering
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Kurt Quackenbush
Date: Friday, September 22, 2023 at 8:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: zOSMF Workflows
> There is something somewhat
Thanks Marna
I did finally manage to place the order for 3.1 and you are correct, no
Semeru 17 in the list. I will have to order that from the CBPDO order list.
Thanks for your help. The key was the product ID!
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 11:57 AM Marna WALLE wrote:
> Hi Bert,
> 9/19/2023 was the
It’s in the STCB for tasks don’t remember the exact name but you’ll find it
And in the LCCA for SRBs you’ll find it there it.
Again don’t remember the exact name but you’ll find it
> On Sep 22, 2023, at 8:39 AM, Binyamin Dissen
> wrote:
>
> I want to figure out which address binds the DU
> There is something somewhat rudimentary in the create workflow screen with
> the pulldown, but I dont know if thats zOSMF doing that, or the browser doing
> that. But then that would likely be just for me?
z/OSMF, not your browser, manages the pulldown of previous workflow definition
I want to figure out which address binds the DU has.
IPCS does not allow access to the real address in CR2.
Where might I find the virtual pointer to the DUCT?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
I don't see such a panel either, but you can view an active or archived
Workflows properties to see the definition file used.
Perhaps you could just have a document with a list of workflows and their
definition file locations?
Regards
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
All,
I have been thinking about this for awhile,, but cant seem to find the answer.
So asking my fellow listers if I am missing something. Workflows are a one
and done affair, and for repeatable processes you need to add it again.The
problem is that the filesystem location for the
Hi Steve,
No not defined the user id
Thanks
On Fri, 22 Sept, 2023, 12:24 am Steve Beaver, <
050e0c375a14-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Have you defined the user to C:D?
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
