OPEN for UPDAT might require the GET LOCATE instead of GET MOVE.
Try OPEN for INPUT and see if work area is populated.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
> I am helping on an assembler program that is accessing a sequential file in
> move mode, yet the move is not happening. R1
There are two tables which contain the programs: 1) The PreInit table
coded with CEEXPIT, CEEXPITY and CEEXPITS macros; 2) The table
maintained by LE.
During the LE initialization process, a table is constructed in
storage controlled by LE. The information in the PreInit table is
copied over.
Th
Are you sure it is not just cache? were the tests run multiple times
and averaged? was the load on the system and dasd sub-system similar
for each test?
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
> Hi
>
> And thank you all
>
> I just did a benchmark
>
> And I had a significant sav
G(W),DATA(31),NODYN,RES,RENT,MAP,SSR
> CBL NOZWB,NUM,NOTERM,NOVBREF,X,APOST,LIB,LIST
>
> Regards,
> Scott
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Sam Siegel wrote:
>
> > Scott - Is any data passed via linkage? Are the programs dynamically
> > loaded and d
they
> execute perform data extract functions , close the file and return
>
> Scott
>
> On Wednesday, December 21, 2016, Sam Siegel wrote:
>
>> I think that the AMODE(24) is of more concern. Depending on how they
>> are invoked and/or how the entry/exit logic works
I think that the AMODE(24) is of more concern. Depending on how they
are invoked and/or how the entry/exit logic works, they may only be
using 24-bit addresses. This would be a problem if a buffer was
passed to them with a valid 31-bit address.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:15 PM, scott Ford wrote:
Peter - Well said.
Sam
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Farley, Peter x23353 <
peter.far...@broadridge.com> wrote:
> Bill,
>
> You do not comprehend the depth of the fear of failure in large, audited
> business organizations.
>
> Also the "verification" you propose that we use for ABO output has
Use the following JCL and Assembler program to force a multi-volume dataset
under SMS control.
//DV55686X JOB ABC,'J: A11J',
// CLASS=A,
// MSGCLASS=9,
// NOTIFY=&SYSUID
//*
//JSDELEXEC PGM=IEFBR14
//DS010DD DSN=TEST.ABC.A11.MULTIVOL,
//DISP=(MOD,
Thanks for sending this out. We will be looking at ABO soon. I'll be very
interested to see your ABO results.
Sam
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson
wrote:
> An update for anyone who cares. My motivation was to get a preview of how
> real application programs might benefit from
change linkage section as follows:
LINKAGE SECTION .
01 ls-parm.
05 ls-length pic s9(4) comp.
05 iterate PIC 9(5) .
jcl parm has half word length. value will be 0 to 100, depending on the
amount of data put on teh PARM=
Sam
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Jesse
Look in the XL C/C++ run time library reference in appendix B Function
Support Table. It provides a comprehensive list of functions which can be
used under an SRB.
Sam
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Janet Graff <
004dc9e91b6d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> We recently found that
it is all about the agenda they are driving. Or the agenda of the
subordinate preparing the talking points.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Walter Davies
wrote:
> Our board of supervisors like to say the mainframe is running on DOS. One
> is an ex intel management employee.
>
> On Fri, Dec 18,
Scott. Look at the DEVTYPE macro also to determine if a DD is present or
absent from the JCL
On Nov 27, 2015 9:15 AM, "Scott Ford" wrote:
> All,
>
> I am i right in thinking that if I issue a
>
>MVCMYDDN,=CL8'AUDIT'
>GETDSAB DDNAME=MYDDN,DSAPTR=MYPTR
>
>
> MYDDN
KEY 0 is not required by an SRB. See IEAMSCHD documentation. Supervisor
state is required.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:48 PM, michelbutz wrote:
> I would think what flavor SRB is always key 0
> Supervisor state
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Nov 5, 2015, at 6:45 PM, Clark Morris
> wrote:
> >
>
Authorized assembler services guide chapter 9. SA22-7608
wlm: programing workload management services : SA22-7619 IWMECRE
and IWM4ECRE
essentially, an enclave srb is associated with a work load management
enclave.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:39 AM, michelbutz wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can someone on the
It works like POST and WAIT. The task to be suspended must call the pause
service with a valid Pause Element.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:17 AM, michelbutz wrote:
>
> Yes 😊I'm using 2.1
>
> Waiting for the likes of Pete Relson to chime in
>
> Thanks so much
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Oct 16
Hi - I tried looking on bitsavers for this, but cannot find it. I'm
wondering if you had the chance to upload it yet?
Thanks,
Sam
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:17 AM, David Cole wrote:
> Will do but I won't be back to the office until tomorrow
>
> Sent from my cell phone . Pease forgive typos.
> On
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Scott Ford wrote:
> All:
>
> I need a sanity check on a design I am wanting to do. We have a Cobol STC
> running with a Assembler Operator Interface, single thread.
> I understand I could redo in Assembler and multi-task, redo in C or C++ and
> thread, but this is
What a wonderful quote.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
> "If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the
> universe."
>
> -- Carl Sagan
>
> Charles
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.E
Several years ago, I developed an API which allows COBOL, ASM, etc. to read
and write native excel files.
To read, the unmodified Excel files is binary uploaded to sequential file
or PDS member. JCL allocates sequential file or PDS member via JCL. COBOL
program accesses sequential file or PDS me
Here are some abend-aid ddnames and their purpose.
//ABENDAID DD SYSOUT=AAlternate DD for Abend-AID output
(Note: A SYSUDUMP/SYSABEND DD is still
required to invoke Abend-AID. Users of
SYSMDUMP must u
I'm not sure if this is the cause of the error or not. But it appears that
the SRB is being copied to CSA, instead of being LOADed to CSA. This might
negatively impact addresses or adcons which were resolved prior to being
copied to CSA.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:36 PM, michealbutz
wrote:
> Hi
Pause/resume service
On Jun 12, 2015 7:57 PM, "Donald Likens" wrote:
> Does any one know of a way to wait in SRB mode. I am pretty sure it can be
> done because BPX1AIO waits when connecting to a TCP/IP address.
>
> --
> For IBM-
Joel - Well said.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Joel Ewing wrote:
>
> I would second the sentiment that it would not be a wise move to
> outsource IT when that is a part of the "core business". With web
> presence being such a key component of customer service these days, I
> would think tha
Agreed. There are good and bad on both sides of that line.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Graham Hobbs wrote:
> Seconded.
> All the business systems in the world seem to work just fine so they must
> have been written by systems programmers:-D
>
> On 2015-04-13 9:21 AM, Farley, Peter x23353
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
> >Our development management are telling is (Systems & Operations) that
> >it is "cheaper to Upgrade the mainfame than to have the application
> >programmers review their code for performance oppurtunities".
>
> I'm disappointed in the react
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
> Neither RDJFCB nor SVC 99 Info Retrieval is perfectly simple but both are
> very workable.
>
> RCJFCB works just like an OPEN except instead of actually opening the DCB,
> it uses an entry in the open exit list to point to an area in which i
You might want to consider doing an SVC99 query by DDNAME to get the
related dataset name.
You can invoke SVC99 from a C program using the C-runtime or directly via
assembler.
Or if you read between the lines enough, you can the c-runtime svc99
function directly from cobol with text units built i
Look at the SYNC(X) macro. It provides a way to invoke a program in a
non-authorized fashion when running authorized.
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
> Agree with Gil's last comment 100%. Or give me an option: program Y does
> not need authorization any more than it would
I'm with you Scott ... I like to have the pdf on local disk.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Scott Ford wrote:
> I would rather download the PDFs,I'm think personally, it's easier more me.
>
> On Wednesday, March 11, 2015, Staller, Allan
> wrote:
>
> > The "new tools" are not as available, rel
in <
> 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:18:15 -0700, Sam Siegel wrote:
> >
> > >How much data? 10meg? 100meg? 1gig?
> > >
> > How about 10 gig? None of those numbers would be unreasonable
> > if COBOL
How much data? 10meg? 100meg? 1gig?
On Mar 9, 2015 2:06 PM, "Scott Ford" wrote:
> Guys:
>
> I will have to read and try ..my question is how do i pass a lot of data
> ...a dataspace ? i would like to avoid dasd if I can ..
>
> Regards,
> Scott
>
> On Mon
Scott - You will need to pass the address of the heap variable back to
COBOL. Then use set address of to associate the address with a COBOL
linkage section entry.
You may also need to take into consideration how LE clean's up the heap.
Depending on which heap the variable is created in, the life t
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Chuck Arney
wrote:
> I was going through this same process a while back. At that time I
> decided that batch compiles with the XL C/C++ compiler just don't work as
> documented. The best you can do is find something that works and not try
> and rationalize it wi
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:40 AM, R.S.
wrote:
> W dniu 2015-02-20 o 16:54, John McKown pisze:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Mark Post wrote:
>>
>> On 2/20/2015 at 08:32 AM, David Crayford wrote:
>>
> Barbarian! Macs are beautiful.
>>> The product may be beautiful, but the c
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Ze'ev Atlas <
004b34e7c98a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Hi allI am trying to create a common interface between COBOL and the
> runtime C library, especially the RegEx related functions.
> The regex.h header file indicates that the regmatch_t structur
Sorry about that. Look in the debug tool users guide for EQANMDBG. That
might do what you want. No completely sure.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:26 PM, michelbutz wrote:
> That syntax is C/C++ I was looking for non le assembler
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Feb 9, 2015, at 5
ctest(); must use langlvl(extended)
__ctest(); langlvl(extended) not required.
include
You can pass a debugger command as a character string as the parm.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:06 PM, michelbutz wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there a way to invoke debug tool from within a
> Non le assembler program
>
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Clark Morris
wrote:
> On 14 Jan 2015 16:57:26 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
> OOPs, the previous response got sent too soon.
>
> . If I
> knew more about some of the newer languages, I might be able to make a
> good case for IBM effort being directed
According to Anthem's website, it was formed by the merger of Wellpoint and
Anthem.
According to http://mainframes.wikidot.com/, Wellpoint is a mainframe shop.
Hopefully as additional details will become available. It seems, that
unless you are in the know, which I'm not, that facts are in short
Gil - Thanks for pointing that out.
Sam
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:17:07 -0800, Sam Siegel wrote:
> >...
> >6) ensure that all required DDs have been appropriately al
Scott - If TSS program is normally called via JCL with PARM=, then you
would need to do the following:
1) build parm in working storage. Binary halfword immediately followed by
data.
2) Data can be from 0 to 100 bytes in length.
3) length of data, not including length of halfword, is placed in hal
On Jan 25, 2015 3:27 AM, "Aled Hughes" <
0050619ca8df-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Oh come on everybody. Lighten up - it's only a game after
:-)
>
> *Ducks*
>
> ALH
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Linda
> To: IBM-MAIN
> Sent: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 2:36
> Subject:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Mullen, Patrick
wrote:
> Let us hope that none of our IBM friends and colleagues on this list are
> included in the alleged 26%.
>
Agreed!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of imu
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Chase, John wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Sam Siegel
> >
> > The question of the day is, were the balls fully inflated our not?
>
> Precisely define "fully inf
The question of the day is, were the balls fully inflated our not?
On Jan 23, 2015 6:28 AM, "Duffy Nightingale, SS"
wrote:
> Good one! Thanks.
>
> Duffy Nightingale
>
> > On Jan 23, 2015, at 4:32 AM, George Rodriguez <
> george.rodrig...@palmbeachschools.org> wrote:
> >
> > lol... Very funny...
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Sam Siegel
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 3:52 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: In C++ any way to get traceback info in a catch()?
>
> On Jan 22, 2015 3:26 PM, "Charles Mills"
On Jan 22, 2015 3:26 PM, "Charles Mills" wrote:
>
> Don, thanks. To clarify, there is no ABEND type condition. The exception
in
> questions is "out of storage" -- bad_alloc.
>
> Where is "machine block" documented or defined? cib_machine is a void*.
>
Look in LE vendor interface manual for all of
ceecib is documented in LE vendor interface manual
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
> Bernd -
>
> Thanks much!
>
> Really. :-)
>
> Yes, I did not mention it, but when I catch conditions (in a generic sense
> of the word) in a signal handler then CEE3DMP shows the real error
Gary - I have an idea of what is occurring, but some additional info is
needed.
1) Does this only happen on second and subsequent load?
2) What attributes (rent, reus, etc.) are present on the load module?
3) is this under CICS? Or a proprietary multitasking region?
4) Is code all ASM? Or is the
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht <
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> wrote:
> Tom Marchant wrote:
>
> >Can I get z/OS messages to be issued in Unicode?
>
> And having Bookmanager bookies written in all those codepages?
>
> >I could probably ask many more questions like these.
> >
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Tony's Basement Computer <
tbabo...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Back years ago I worked at a Top Secret shop. That product wrote a
> console message when a log on attempt has occurred that specified an
> unknown user. Sadly, what was usually seen was a password. It's b
Thanks!
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Ed Finnell <
000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> http://www.mxg.com/thebuttonman/boney.asp
>
>
> In a message dated 1/2/2015 11:54:31 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> s...@pscsi.net writes:
>
> Brilliant. Thanks for sending it out.
>
>
Brilliant. Thanks for sending it out.
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Pedro Vera wrote:
> Earlier this year, they had a talent show at work. I foolishly
> volunteered to sing.
>
> Please enjoy my mainframe tribute song!
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQ__nvHJGLA
>
>
relinking does not change calling program. This has the potential to
reduce testing effort.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Frank Swarbrick <
002782105f5c-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Thanks.I still have to wonder why anyone would use that instead of just
> recompiling with DYNA
I was interpreting Scott's question as how can above-the-bar memory be used
directly by COBOL.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:06 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
> Perhaps I misunderstood the problem.
>
> Whether called by the system, Cobol, or anything else, an HLASM routine
> can get any storage that its
Hi Victor - Look at the EXTR parameter in the ATTACH(X) documentation.
This end-of-task exist gets control on normal and abnormal end-of-task.
You can issue the DETACH macro from within this exit.
Sam
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Victor Gil
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Working on a general p
Scott - I think that only enterprise cobol 5.x support 64 bit natively.
Sam
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Scott Ford <
0006f84450fa-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> All,
> I have a generalized design question. First background will help. Our
> products run as Enterprise Cobol STC,
handle, though... :-)
>
> Kirk Wolf
> Dovetailed Technologies
> http://dovetail.com
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Sam Siegel wrote:
>
> > To obtain the address of an XPLINK C/C++ routine which can be called
> from a
> > NON-XPLINK program, look at the fetch() f
To obtain the address of an XPLINK C/C++ routine which can be called from a
NON-XPLINK program, look at the fetch() function in the C/C++ run time
library reference.
When calling "fetch()" from COBOL, the COBOL code will have to use the
RETURNING facility of the CALL statement to get the address o
:
> Sam Siegel wrote:
> >Look at the assembler service guide. Dynalloc () is just a wrapper which
> >calls svc99.
>
> Right...we know that. Of course SVC 99 supports this; the question was:
> >Does anyone know whether dynalloc() supports FREE=CLOSE,SPIN=UNALLOC?
>
>
Look at the assembler service guide. Dynalloc () is just a wrapper which
calls svc99.
On Sep 5, 2014 6:55 PM, "Janet Graff" <
004dc9e91b6d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I have a Started Task with a log file. I'd like to SPIN off the log files
> from my C program and allow the user
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Mark Post wrote:
> >>> On 8/21/2014 at 05:47 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
> > Not entirely clear to me how the COBOL brain drain is addressed by
> > recompiling and re-hosting Cobol on distributed computing platforms.
>
> It's magic, I guess. Suddenly someone other t
Have you considered writing a program which dynamically allocates the
output files?
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:34 AM, TonyIcloud-OPERA
wrote:
> I have a dataset that contains records with a field, by which I need to
> create a separate dataset that would contain all occurrences of that field.
>
Don't.
Use occurs depending on or keep track of number of entries in a separate
variable.
Populate entries as needed. All valid entrIes are initialized when
populated.
Restrict subsequent operations to number of rows in table.
On Aug 11, 2014 6:37 PM, "Ron Thomas" wrote:
> Hello.
>
> We have
(1,4, BI, A) will provide ascending sequence for unsigned binary numbers
(1,4, FI, A) will provide ascending sequence for signed binary numbers.
COBOL PICTURE clause of S9(09) COMP, is for a 4 byte signed binary number.
On Jul 20, 2014 7:58 PM, "Ron Thomas" wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have file in
Several variables, including FEOF, are not explicitly initialized to 0.
The program appears to set FEOF to 1 only when there is an error opening
either of the DDs.
There may be residual data on the stack which is setting FEOF to a non-zero
value.
I don't think the C standard requires the compile
VSAM Media Manager
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Bernd Oppolzer
wrote:
> I know that DB2 does not use VSAM KSDS - only for very limited purposes,
> IIRC - some logfile directories or boot strap data sets, don't recall the
> details.
>
> The tablespace data sets are VSAM LDS - linear data sets
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
> Thank you all for your valuable suggestions.
>
> The compiler is z/OS XL/C V1.13 and V1.11 -
> well, in fact, I didn't test it with the 1.11. version.
> I observed the problem on the site with the 1.13 version.
>
> This is part of the PL/1
Macros as you suggest (slightly different names) should be fully documented
in the c/c++ users guide or language reference.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
> Is there a standard IBM z/OS XLC macro for "is compiling on z/OS"? I looked
> for __ZOS and __MVS and so forth but
On Jan 27, 2014 6:20 AM, "Bernd Oppolzer"
wrote:
>
> Some years ago, I had to make available a library which does
> some SSL coding and encoding to PL/1 callers, and that was a little
> complicated, because the library was coded in C - which was no problem -
> but it was compiled and linked using
Scott - The PC is going to have to provide the codepage of the message data
someplace in the communication protocol. Either as a separate field,
separate message or as a prefix/suffix to the message data.
It will be pretty dicey to attempt to guess the codepage based on the
message data.
One oth
e C
> Doc is maddening at times
>
> Scott ford
> www.identityforge.com
> from my IPAD
>
> 'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'
>
>
> > On Dec 4, 2013, at 4:25 PM, Sam Siegel wrote:
> >
> > look at the msgctl, msggegt, msgrcv, msgsnd
through infinite means'
>
>
> > On Dec 4, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Sam Siegel wrote:
> >
> > Scott - Do the security action messages and non-section action messages
> > come into the process via the same tcp connection? The based on type of
> > processing (secur
Scott - Do the security action messages and non-section action messages
come into the process via the same tcp connection? The based on type of
processing (security vs.non-security) get processed by different sub-tasks?
If the answer is yes, you may need 3 sub taks:
1) tcp processing
2) security
Try using TCBJLB for STEPLIB DCB or CVTLINK for LINKLIST DCB. Both are
GUPI.
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM, MichealButz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I having been using BLDL to get program directory information I found the
> macro to not give correct results.
>
> So I have moved on to DESERV FUNC=GE
Scott, what attributes are you specifically looking? I've got some devtype
code tucked away somewhere.
Sam
On Oct 23, 2013 6:48 AM, "Scott Ford" wrote:
> All,
> Have you seen anyone using DEVTYPE macro to pickup the ddname information ?
>
> Scott ford
> www.identityforge.com
> from my IPAD
>
>
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Raupach, Robert E (CTO Architecture +
Engineering) wrote:
> Greetings...
>
> A colleague asked me the following question:
>
> "Is there a way to determine how many parameters are being passed into a
> COBOL program?"
>
> I could show him in Assembler, but in COBO
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:53 AM, John McKown
wrote:
> And one thing to remember is that the main task, in the PAUSE/RESUME or
> WAIT/POST must "poll" for communications from the subtask. I have not used
> PAUSE/RELEASE, but it appears that, unlike WAIT/POST, the task doesn't have
> a way to "poll"
See other email. Problem resolved.
Thanks.
On Aug 27, 2013 6:16 AM, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)"
wrote:
> In
> ,
> on 08/26/2013
>at 10:03 PM, Sam Siegel said:
>
> >Below is the module and offset.
>
> Did you search for IEAVTESP+0B3A? Create a PMR? Where
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Peter Relson wrote:
> I don't know why LE would issue an ESPIE if you told it not to. It
> certainly seems from the evidence that something is issuing ESPIE.
> And it's issuing it in your state, which is supervisor state, which
> therefore will result in the abend
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <
shmuel+...@patriot.net> wrote:
> In
> ,
> on 08/24/2013
> at 04:52 PM, Sam Siegel said:
>
> >Hello - I'm experiencing an 46D-18 abend
>
> Where? Providing module.csect+offset would eliminat
) , but it was
> a "normal" C++ application, so no CEEPIPI. The application was very
> complex, and I wasn't able to find a way
> to run the code under enclave SRB.
> Some small parts (for example the ZIP inflate/deflate) library was proper
> to run in zIIP, but it is
&
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Peter Relson wrote:
> I don't know why LE would issue an ESPIE if you told it not to. It
> certainly seems from the evidence that something is issuing ESPIE.
> And it's issuing it in your state, which is supervisor state, which
> therefore will result in the abend
Hello - I'm experiencing an 46D-18 abend under certain conditions when
running a supervisor mode multi-tcb CEEPIPI job step. Under other
conditions the 46D-18 does not occur.
Any assistance or advice would be appreciated.
Per the system completion codes documentation, a 46D-18 occurs when an
ESP
Hi - Does anyone know if zIIP engines can be used with z/TPF?
Thanks,
Sam
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
lto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Sam Siegel
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 11:08 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Any clues on fwrite_unlocked()
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
>
> > Anyone using fwr
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
> Anyone using fwrite_unlocked() successfully? Per TFM I have
>
> #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED 1
>
I think the following define is required prior to including stdio.h
#define _OPEN_SYS_UNLOCKED_EXT 1
Sam
>
> ahead of any #includes (incl
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
> Am I correct in my reading of the C manuals? (I find the information
> somewhat scattered and oddly organized.)
>
> If I want to write a typical old-fashioned z/OS dataset in format VB and
> that contains binary fields in a field-oriented re
e.
>
> Peter
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Sam Siegel
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 10:00 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: REXX and CEEPIPI questions.
>
> On Wed, Jul 1
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:30 AM, John McKown
wrote:
> I am trying to look at how to use the PCRE from Ze'ev Atlas in a REXX
> program in a "REXXish" way. PCRE is written in C and is basically
> implemented as a bunch of subroutines. Being in C means this requires LE. I
> could just write my code t
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main( int argc, char **argv )
{
printf ( "%s\n", argv[1] );
return 0;
}
//SAMPLEJ JOB MUP,'JOB: SAMPLE',
// CLASS=A,
// MSGCLASS=X,
// NOTIFY=&SYSUID
//*
//*
//JS010EXEC PGM=SAMPLE,PARM='/A.B.C'
//STEPLIB DD DSN=MUP.LOAD
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 7:27 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
> 'grammer' is, I think, best viewed as a nonce word. David Crayford
> knows very well that the canonical spelling is 'grammar'.
>
Man have you no sense of humor at all. ??
>
> John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
>
> ---
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Mowry, Norma E CIV DISA ESB (US) <
norma.e.mowry@mail.mil> wrote:
> We have a production job that is abending with S0C7 reason 0007. I
> set a slip to capture a dump but I can't seem to find the input record that
> is causing the S0C7 in this dump. I also
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Steve Comstock
wrote:
> On 6/29/2013 12:27 PM, Sam Siegel wrote:
>
>> Hello - my process creates several TCBs. Each TCB establishes its own LE
>> enclave using CEEPIPI. As part of the LE runtime options used in testing,
>> RPTSTG(ON) is
Hello - my process creates several TCBs. Each TCB establishes its own LE
enclave using CEEPIPI. As part of the LE runtime options used in testing,
RPTSTG(ON) is used. As each task ends, the storage report is printed.
The storage report title for each task is "Options Report for Enclave
CEEPIPI 0
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Ron Thomas wrote:
> Hello.
>
> can some one pls let me know what this assembler code does?
>
> TMI2REC+ISTAT-IREC,SDLET
>
>
Ron the code does the following
ISTAT-IREC the offset of ISTAT from IREC.
That offset is added to the address of I2REC. This a locatio
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
> If that is such an issue, that you really need that level of assurance,
> then don't purchase the software.
>
> I know of no vendor (large or small) that is the business to steal your
> secrets.
>
> Besides, accessing data is not enough.
> Wit
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:10 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
> My own experience with the Enterprise PL/I Compiler and the relevant
> libraries is that Shmuel's second sort of problem, viz.,
>
> 2. Code compiled with new compiler doesn't run correctly with old
> libraries.
>
> is still a significant one i
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Skip Robinson wrote:
> I've never been in a shop where programs were (re)compiled into
> production. Once a program is compiled and tested, it's copied into
> production.
>
> Whatever risk might be incurred by moving a program into a down-level
> environment, the r
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
