Re: Ad importance of the message paradigm (Re: Secure sockets (Re: Some questions on SYSCALL

2022-07-03 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Bob, On 02.07.2022 22:06, Bob Bridges wrote: Rony, could you (or someone) say more about that? The ooRexx documentation has a lot to say about messaging, which is a bit confusing to me because I first got a handle on OOP in VBA and VBSCript, which do not. VBA and VBS would allow

Re: Ad importance of the message paradigm (Re: Secure sockets (Re: Some questions on SYSCALL

2022-07-03 Thread Seymour J Metz
, July 2, 2022 4:06 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Ad importance of the message paradigm (Re: Secure sockets (Re: Some questions on SYSCALL Rony, could you (or someone) say more about that? The ooRexx documentation has a lot to say about messaging, which is a bit confusing to me

Re: Ad importance of the message paradigm (Re: Secure sockets (Re: Some questions on SYSCALL

2022-07-03 Thread Seymour J Metz
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Rupert Reynolds [rreyno...@cix.co.uk] Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2022 6:51 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Ad importance of the message paradigm (Re: Secure sockets (Re: Some

Re: Ad importance of the message paradigm (Re: Secure sockets (Re: Some questions on SYSCALL

2022-07-03 Thread Rupert Reynolds
Yes, perhaps the best example :-) On Sun, 3 Jul 2022, 12:01 David Crayford, wrote: > IIRC Lisp was designed in 1956. That must have been ground breaking at the > time. > > > On 3 Jul 2022, at 18:51, Rupert Reynolds wrote: > > > > The thing about Smalltalk (and a lot of other developments) is

Re: Ad importance of the message paradigm (Re: Secure sockets (Re: Some questions on SYSCALL

2022-07-03 Thread David Crayford
IIRC Lisp was designed in 1956. That must have been ground breaking at the time. > On 3 Jul 2022, at 18:51, Rupert Reynolds wrote: > > The thing about Smalltalk (and a lot of other developments) is just how old > they are. And we keep re-inventing some things. Smalltalk was remarkable in >

Re: Ad importance of the message paradigm (Re: Secure sockets (Re: Some questions on SYSCALL

2022-07-03 Thread Rupert Reynolds
The thing about Smalltalk (and a lot of other developments) is just how old they are. And we keep re-inventing some things. Smalltalk was remarkable in 1970-ish. Lambdas in Algol-68, but it wasn't the first I believe, and they can be tracked back further to maths in 1932. Great insights in the

Re: Ad importance of the message paradigm (Re: Secure sockets (Re: Some questions on SYSCALL

2022-07-02 Thread David Crayford
He wasn't too complementary about Java either. I never used Smalltalk but I've seen examples in the GoF Design Patterns book. Guys I've spoken to that used it extensively talk very fondly about it. On 3/07/2022 5:37 am, Rupert Reynolds wrote: I can't remember which of Alan Kay's talks it's

Re: Ad importance of the message paradigm (Re: Secure sockets (Re: Some questions on SYSCALL

2022-07-02 Thread Rupert Reynolds
I can't remember which of Alan Kay's talks it's in, but I have a few of his saved and one or two have him saying "the big idea is messaging" and something like "whatever I had in mind, I can tell you now it wasn't C++" :-) The late great Joe Armstrong (of Erlang fame) also quoted Alan Kay on this

Re: Ad importance of the message paradigm (Re: Secure sockets (Re: Some questions on SYSCALL

2022-07-02 Thread Bob Bridges
Rony, could you (or someone) say more about that? The ooRexx documentation has a lot to say about messaging, which is a bit confusing to me because I first got a handle on OOP in VBA and VBSCript, which do not. If the big idea is messaging, does VBA do that and I just didn't notice? Or are

Ad importance of the message paradigm (Re: Secure sockets (Re: Some questions on SYSCALL

2022-07-02 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Alan Kay is regarded to have coined the term "object-oriented programming (OOP)" in the context of his work while at PARC. He is being cited on Wikipedia: I'm sorry that I long ago coined the term "objects" for this topic because it gets many people to focus on the lesser idea. The big