>
> Hi
>
> Is it possible to change IEASYMxx via operator reply at IPL ?
What specifically are you trying to solve. IBM has SYMUPDTE which can
dynamically change the IEASYMxx entries (Static Symbols only) after an IPL.
Obj Deck for this is in SYS1.SAMPLIB.
If you need more details on SYMUJPDTE
Hi
I would like to use at one IPL IEASYMxx and IEASYMyy at the next ,
without changing the LOAD member.
I thought I could say SYM=xx or SYM=yy, but it is not the case.
(Swapping LPAR's)
On 14.06.2012 15:35, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to change IEASYMxx via operator reply at I
If using one IEASYM member on different LPARs is the question:
You can make different sections in IEASYM, depending on LPARname and
HWAREname as defined in the HCD.
Effectively each LPAR you has its own IEASYM member(section).
Will this do?
Kees.
"Miklos Szigetvari" wrote in
message news:<4fd9e
> I would like to use at one IPL IEASYMxx and IEASYMyy at the next ,
without changing
> the LOAD member.
> I thought I could say SYM=xx or SYM=yy, but it is not the case.
> (Swapping LPAR's)
>
> On 14.06.2012 15:35, Lizette Koehler wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Is it possible to change IEASYMxx via op
W dniu 2012-06-14 15:49, Miklos Szigetvari pisze:
Hi
I would like to use at one IPL IEASYMxx and IEASYMyy at the next ,
without changing the LOAD member.
I thought I could say SYM=xx or SYM=yy, but it is not the case.
(Swapping LPAR's)
1. You can have sections in both LOADxx and IEASYMxx membe
You don't have to change the same LOAD member, you can have two LOAD
members with different IEASYM members and change load parameter at IPL.
Or if you prefer, as Kees says, make different sections with HWAREname &
LPARname as defined in HCD in the same IEASYM member.
2012/6/14 Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
We intend to swap the systems between two LPAR's.
Till now LPAR1 was z/OS 1.12 and LPAR2 was z/OS 1.13
Now we would like to change
On 14.06.2012 15:59, Lizette Koehler wrote:
I would like to use at one IPL IEASYMxx and IEASYMyy at the next ,
without changing
the LOAD member.
I thought I could
On 14.06.2012 16:02, R.S. wrote:
W dniu 2012-06-14 15:49, Miklos Szigetvari pisze:
Hi
I would like to use at one IPL IEASYMxx and IEASYMyy at the next ,
without changing the LOAD member.
I thought I could say SYM=xx or SYM=yy, but it is not the case.
(Swapping LPAR's)
1. You can have sections
012 7:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Change IEASYMxx via opartor prompt
We intend to swap the systems between two LPAR's.
Till now LPAR1 was z/OS 1.12 and LPAR2 was z/OS 1.13 Now we would like to change
On 14.06.2012 15:59, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>> I would like t
There is no prompt for IEASYMxx at IPL time. The only way to change it is
in the LOADxx member through the HMC. That is because some of the
information is needed during the load process.
Lizette
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / sign
Hi
Thank you for all.
On 14.06.2012 16:25, Lizette Koehler wrote:
There is no prompt for IEASYMxx at IPL time. The only way to change it is
in the LOADxx member through the HMC. That is because some of the
information is needed during the load process.
Lizette
edu] On
:>: Behalf Of Miklos Szigetvari
:>: Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 7:05 AM
:>: To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
:>: Subject: Re: Change IEASYMxx via opartor prompt
:>:
:>: We intend to swap the systems between two LPAR's.
:>: Till now LPAR1 was z/OS 1.12 and LPAR2 was z/OS
lf Of retired mainframer
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 4:10 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Change IEASYMxx via opartor prompt
>
> Color me confused. Using different IEASYMxx members with
> different systems
> should be easier than trying to use the same system w
In <020b01cd4a32$9d67acd0$d8370670$@mindspring.com>, on 06/14/2012
at 06:35 AM, Lizette Koehler said:
>What specifically are you trying to solve. IBM has SYMUPDTE which
>can dynamically change the IEASYMxx entries (Static Symbols only)
>after an IPL.
The last time I looked you couldn't make
FWIW, the samplib member is IEASYMUP (SYMUPDTE was a predecessor not
provided with z/OS itself).
A different mechanism may replace IEASYMUP at some point.
>The last time I looked you couldn't make the value of a symbol longer.
I'm not sure when (or where) you looked. That has never been a facto
15 matches
Mail list logo
