A small suggestion for the code below would be to add a unique identifier to
each WRITE Statement. It seems like every company I've implemented SMS in has
constructs which are assigned at multiple points in the code.
If that were to be true in this case, it would be more difficult to determ
what
you expect.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Jake Anderson
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 3:15 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Extended SMS routine
>
> Hello Liz,
>
LINEAR CYL(8000 0) SHAREOPTIONS(3))
HTH,
Bart
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 7:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Extended SMS routine
Jake,
You w
2015 3:15 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Extended SMS routine
>
> Hello Liz,
>
> I did add the below lines in DATACLAS:
>
> WHEN (&DATACLAS = 'EXTENDED') SET &DATACLAS = &DATACLAS
>
> WHEN (&DSN = OMVSPRD.SMPE.**)
t; > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> > On Behalf Of van der Grijn, Bart (B)
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 6:32 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: Extended SMS routine
> >
> > How do you believe you
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Jake Anderson
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 9:21 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Extended SMS routine
>
> Hello Van,
>
> I t
frame Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jake Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 9:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Extended SMS routine
Hello Van,
I tried creating with the smaller size with the dataclas: extended, but it
takes another dataclas. Not sur
--Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Jake Anderson
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 5:12 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Extended SMS routine
>
> Hi Elardus/All,
>
> I do see the DATACLA
riginal Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jake Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 5:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Extended SMS routine
Hi Elardus/All,
I do see the DATACLAS under the CDS 'ACTIVE'
EXTENDED 20:
Hi Elardus/All,
I do see the DATACLAS under the CDS 'ACTIVE'
EXTENDED 20:22 EXTENDED REQUIRED YES
The Storage Group has a mod-27 volume and with just 20% used. Not sure why
it is still not honouring the allocation of more than 4G
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Elardus Engelbrecht <
e
Jake Anderson wrote:
>Sorry, It was in cylinders :)
It is all right. Many thanks.
>The dataclas: extended had the extended address ability to 'YES'. Is there a
>way to check if a particular DATACLAS is active ?
If you have activated your ACDS, do you see that DATACLAS when you use ISMF
with C
Sorry, It was in cylinders :)
The dataclas: extended had the extended address ability to 'YES'. Is there
a way to check if a particular DATACLAS is active ?
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Elardus Engelbrecht <
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> wrote:
> Jake Anderson wrote:
>
> >I am trying to de
Jake Anderson wrote:
>I am trying to define a zfs with a size of 8000 primary and 1000 as secondary.
What size? Cyls, tracks, records, bytes, eggs, sheeps, what?
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Hello Group,
I am trying to define a zfs with a size of 8000 primary and 1000 as
secondary. During the allocation i have specified the dataclas value as
:EXTENDED(which is already defined in ISMF).
During the allocation it again fails with the below message :
IGD01008I ALLOCATION SET TO SCOMVSP
14 matches
Mail list logo
