Re: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2

2020-05-06 Thread Mike Schwab
90% of 40 is 36, so I would make it 70 on one system then try starting z/OS 2.2. Once you see the utilization there you can figure another size and change again. On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 1:34 PM Elaine Beal wrote: > > Thanks. > I can't start 2.2 (so can't enter the $DACTIVATE) and on my 1.13

Re: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2

2020-05-06 Thread Elaine Beal
Thanks. I can't start 2.2 (so can't enter the $DACTIVATE) and on my 1.13 system it's 40 cyls, 90% free so presumably CFSIZER would say that's enough. I can double or triple it no problem but I find it a little strange that 2.2 needs over 90% of my current allocation when JOBS/JOES/BERTS etc

Re: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2

2020-05-06 Thread Allan Staller
11:14 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2 [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise your

Re: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2

2020-05-06 Thread Lizette Koehler
become more of an art. Lizette -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Elaine Beal Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 9:06 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2 Allan, Thank you. How would I know how large to make

Re: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2

2020-05-06 Thread Elaine Beal
Allan, Thank you. How would I know how large to make it, leaving a reasonable amount of free space? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO

Re: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2

2020-05-05 Thread Lizette Koehler
Beal Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 9:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2 We are migrating from 1.13 to 2.2 in a MAS sysplex. JES2 WARM start, no parm changes. Checkpoint in z11 mode. Of course I'm trying to get around having to define a separate JES on 2.2

Re: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2

2020-05-05 Thread Lizette Koehler
and then reload your spool from V1.13 to V2.2 You may still need to increase the size of CKPT and/or CF Lizette -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Elaine Beal Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 9:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13

Re: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2 [EXTERNAL]

2020-05-05 Thread Feller, Paul
*** BOTTOM OF DATA Thanks.. Paul Feller AGT Mainframe Technical Support -----Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Allan Staller Sent: Tue

Re: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2

2020-05-05 Thread Allan Staller
You will also need to redefine the Structure to correspond with the larger checkpoint sizes. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Elaine Beal Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 11:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2

Re: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2

2020-05-05 Thread Allan Staller
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Elaine Beal Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 11:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2 [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may

JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2

2020-05-05 Thread Elaine Beal
We are migrating from 1.13 to 2.2 in a MAS sysplex. JES2 WARM start, no parm changes. Checkpoint in z11 mode. Of course I'm trying to get around having to define a separate JES on 2.2 LPAR A cold start is a possibility. Right now that's the only possible 'fix' that I see When I IPL the first