90% of 40 is 36, so I would make it 70 on one system then try starting
z/OS 2.2. Once you see the utilization there you can figure another
size and change again.
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 1:34 PM Elaine Beal wrote:
>
> Thanks.
> I can't start 2.2 (so can't enter the $DACTIVATE) and on my 1.13
Thanks.
I can't start 2.2 (so can't enter the $DACTIVATE) and on my 1.13 system
it's 40 cyls, 90% free so presumably CFSIZER would say that's enough.
I can double or triple it no problem but I find it a little strange that 2.2
needs
over 90% of my current allocation when JOBS/JOES/BERTS etc
11:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email,
which can steal your Information and compromise your
become
more of an art.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Elaine Beal
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 9:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2
Allan,
Thank you.
How would I know how large to make
Allan,
Thank you.
How would I know how large to make it, leaving a reasonable amount of free
space?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
Beal
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 9:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2
We are migrating from 1.13 to 2.2 in a MAS sysplex.
JES2 WARM start, no parm changes.
Checkpoint in z11 mode.
Of course I'm trying to get around having to define a separate JES on 2.2
and then reload your spool from V1.13 to
V2.2
You may still need to increase the size of CKPT and/or CF
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Elaine Beal
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 9:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13
*** BOTTOM
OF DATA
Thanks..
Paul Feller
AGT Mainframe Technical Support
-----Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Tue
You will also need to redefine the Structure to correspond with the larger
checkpoint sizes.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Elaine Beal
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 11:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Elaine Beal
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 11:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: JES2 Checkpoint Size 1.13 to 2.2
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may
We are migrating from 1.13 to 2.2 in a MAS sysplex.
JES2 WARM start, no parm changes.
Checkpoint in z11 mode.
Of course I'm trying to get around having to define a separate JES on 2.2 LPAR
A cold start is a possibility. Right now that's the only possible 'fix' that I
see
When I IPL the first
11 matches
Mail list logo
