Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL

2018-04-26 Thread John McKown
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Mohammad Khan wrote: > I use XODO app on my Android tablet which allows annotating pdfs, price is > $0. > Mohammad > ​Thanks! I'll look at that after work.​ > > On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:25:52 -0500, John McKown < >

Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL

2018-04-26 Thread Mohammad Khan
I use XODO app on my Android tablet which allows annotating pdfs, price is $0. Mohammad On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:25:52 -0500, John McKown wrote: > >​Thanks, I'll look at that. > >Not bad. It costs some money, but I don't know if I'm willing to pay >$15/month for

Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL

2018-04-26 Thread Brian Westerman
Brian Westerman >Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 12:58 AM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL > >OAM is pretty fast for SMS managed tape. For example, we have a client that >uses literally thousands of really small tapes per day (it's

Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL

2018-04-25 Thread Benik, John E
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Brian Westerman Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 12:58 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL OAM is pretty fast for SMS managed tape. For example, we have a client that uses literally thousands

Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL

2018-04-25 Thread John Eells
John McKown wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:18 AM, John Eells wrote: John McKown wrote: I would argue about his, except that most electronic manuals are in PDF format and PDF does _not_ allow updating the PDF file itself to contain highlighting & notes. Or, if it does, I

Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL

2018-04-25 Thread John McKown
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:18 AM, John Eells wrote: > John McKown wrote: > > >> I would argue about his, except that most electronic manuals >> are in PDF format and PDF does _not_ allow updating the PDF file itself to >> contain highlighting & notes. Or, if it does, I don't

Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL

2018-04-25 Thread John Eells
John McKown wrote: I would argue about his, except that most electronic manuals are in PDF format and PDF does _not_ allow updating the PDF file itself to contain highlighting & notes. Or, if it does, I don't have any software which can do this. Adobe Acrobat DC offers the ability to comment

Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL

2018-04-25 Thread John McKown
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:14 PM, Brian Westerman < brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com> wrote: > I'm not really sure if software delivery on physical tape is a benefit or > not. Personally I don't think so, but I also don't think it costs IBM > anything to provide it if someone (anyone) might need

Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL

2018-04-24 Thread Brian Westerman
I'm not really sure if software delivery on physical tape is a benefit or not. Personally I don't think so, but I also don't think it costs IBM anything to provide it if someone (anyone) might need it. What would be kind of cool is if they could provide it in some standard virtual tape

Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL

2018-04-24 Thread John Eells
Edward Gould wrote: On Apr 24, 2018, at 12:58 AM, Brian Westerman wrote: OAM is pretty fast for SMS managed tape. For example, we have a client that uses literally thousands of really small tapes per day (it's a long sordid story as to why) with 512 virtual

Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL

2018-04-24 Thread Edward Gould
> On Apr 24, 2018, at 12:58 AM, Brian Westerman > wrote: > > OAM is pretty fast for SMS managed tape. For example, we have a client that > uses literally thousands of really small tapes per day (it's a long sordid > story as to why) with 512 virtual tape

Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL

2018-04-23 Thread Brian Westerman
On >Behalf Of Brian Westerman >Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2018 7:07 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL > >If you are going to use System Managed Tape with your MTL, then you do have a >couple of configuration options under ISMF y

Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL

2018-04-23 Thread Benik, John E
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL If you are going to use System Managed Tape with your MTL, then you do have a couple of configuration options under ISMF you will need to update. Also, did you define you library(ies) in your IODF EDT? OAM is not really obsolete

Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL

2018-04-21 Thread Brian Westerman
If you are going to use System Managed Tape with your MTL, then you do have a couple of configuration options under ISMF you will need to update. Also, did you define you library(ies) in your IODF EDT? OAM is not really obsolete, it has a real purpose in some situations. The above is just

Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL

2018-04-20 Thread Lizette Koehler
:43 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL > > We are using a DLM for our virtual tape library and have them defined as > MTLs. OAM starts without object tape support, I would like to know if this > is something we should look at adding,

OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL

2018-04-20 Thread Benik, John E
We are using a DLM for our virtual tape library and have them defined as MTLs. OAM starts without object tape support, I would like to know if this is something we should look at adding, or does it not have any impact one way or another? Here is what OAM shows at startup. 22.16.22 S0169252