On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Mohammad Khan wrote:
> I use XODO app on my Android tablet which allows annotating pdfs, price is
> $0.
> Mohammad
>
Thanks! I'll look at that after work.
>
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:25:52 -0500, John McKown <
>
I use XODO app on my Android tablet which allows annotating pdfs, price is $0.
Mohammad
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:25:52 -0500, John McKown
wrote:
>
>Thanks, I'll look at that.
>
>Not bad. It costs some money, but I don't know if I'm willing to pay
>$15/month for
Brian Westerman
>Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 12:58 AM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL
>
>OAM is pretty fast for SMS managed tape. For example, we have a client that
>uses literally thousands of really small tapes per day (it's
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Brian Westerman
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 12:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL
OAM is pretty fast for SMS managed tape. For example, we have a client that
uses literally thousands
John McKown wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:18 AM, John Eells wrote:
John McKown wrote:
I would argue about his, except that most electronic manuals
are in PDF format and PDF does _not_ allow updating the PDF file itself to
contain highlighting & notes. Or, if it does, I
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:18 AM, John Eells wrote:
> John McKown wrote:
>
>
>> I would argue about his, except that most electronic manuals
>> are in PDF format and PDF does _not_ allow updating the PDF file itself to
>> contain highlighting & notes. Or, if it does, I don't
John McKown wrote:
I would argue about his, except that most electronic manuals
are in PDF format and PDF does _not_ allow updating the PDF file itself to
contain highlighting & notes. Or, if it does, I don't have any software
which can do this.
Adobe Acrobat DC offers the ability to comment
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:14 PM, Brian Westerman <
brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com> wrote:
> I'm not really sure if software delivery on physical tape is a benefit or
> not. Personally I don't think so, but I also don't think it costs IBM
> anything to provide it if someone (anyone) might need
I'm not really sure if software delivery on physical tape is a benefit or not.
Personally I don't think so, but I also don't think it costs IBM anything to
provide it if someone (anyone) might need it. What would be kind of cool is if
they could provide it in some standard virtual tape
Edward Gould wrote:
On Apr 24, 2018, at 12:58 AM, Brian Westerman
wrote:
OAM is pretty fast for SMS managed tape. For example, we have a client that
uses literally thousands of really small tapes per day (it's a long sordid
story as to why) with 512 virtual
> On Apr 24, 2018, at 12:58 AM, Brian Westerman
> wrote:
>
> OAM is pretty fast for SMS managed tape. For example, we have a client that
> uses literally thousands of really small tapes per day (it's a long sordid
> story as to why) with 512 virtual tape
On
>Behalf Of Brian Westerman
>Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2018 7:07 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL
>
>If you are going to use System Managed Tape with your MTL, then you do have a
>couple of configuration options under ISMF y
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL
If you are going to use System Managed Tape with your MTL, then you do have a
couple of configuration options under ISMF you will need to update.
Also, did you define you library(ies) in your IODF EDT?
OAM is not really obsolete
If you are going to use System Managed Tape with your MTL, then you do have a
couple of configuration options under ISMF you will need to update.
Also, did you define you library(ies) in your IODF EDT?
OAM is not really obsolete, it has a real purpose in some situations. The
above is just
:43 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: OAM and Object Tape Support with an MTL
>
> We are using a DLM for our virtual tape library and have them defined as
> MTLs. OAM starts without object tape support, I would like to know if this
> is something we should look at adding,
We are using a DLM for our virtual tape library and have them defined as MTLs.
OAM starts without object tape support, I would like to know if this is
something we should look at adding, or does it not have any impact one way or
another?
Here is what OAM shows at startup.
22.16.22 S0169252
16 matches
Mail list logo