IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin [000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 2:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF for mainframe Linux
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:41:42 -0800, Tom Brennan wrote:
>I haven't used SPF/P
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:13:47 -0800, Tom Brennan wrote:
>I'm just saying it was a surprise.
>
>I don't know anything about WSA other than I tried it once, saw that
>each line of the simulated ISPF edit area was a separate edit box, and
>that did it for me. I never tried it again.
>
I had a simila
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin [000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 2:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF for mainframe Linux
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:51:46 +, Seymour J Metz
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Tom
Brennan [t...@tombrennansoftware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 2:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF for mainframe Linux
I'm just saying it was a surprise.
I don't know anything about
UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF for mainframe Linux
I think an enhanced ISPF should be factored as an X11 client, with
all the nice things that aren't "possible via 3270." Or is that what
WSA already does?
-- gil
--
F
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:51:46 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>I always regarded the scrolling on TSPF as an expected feature on a PC
>application, rather than as a surprise. As long as things that worked on ISPF
>worked the same on TSPF, I was quite happy to have additional features, e.g.,
>regexe
I'm just saying it was a surprise.
I don't know anything about WSA other than I tried it once, saw that
each line of the simulated ISPF edit area was a separate edit box, and
that did it for me. I never tried it again.
On 1/26/2021 11:03 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:41:4
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:41:42 -0800, Tom Brennan wrote:
>I haven't used SPF/PC in many years, but I do remember it doing things
>that weren't possible via 3270, and those were sometimes a surprise.
>For example, I think I remember it automatically scrolling down text
>just by moving the cursor pas
f Tom
Brennan [t...@tombrennansoftware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 1:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF for mainframe Linux
I haven't used SPF/PC in many years, but I do remember it doing things
that weren't possible via 3270, and those were sometimes a surprise.
I haven't used SPF/PC in many years, but I do remember it doing things
that weren't possible via 3270, and those were sometimes a surprise.
For example, I think I remember it automatically scrolling down text
just by moving the cursor past the bottom of the screen. Can't do that
on a real 3270
I remember SPF/PC; they were never serious about ISPF compatibility, and I
bought TSPF instead.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
PINION, RICHARD W. [rpin
...@intnlsoftwareproducts.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 10:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF for mainframe Linux
I still have and use the SPF/PC GUI Version 4.0 Build 965 circa 2002 running
on Windows 10. It is too bad it wasn't still available and slightly
modernized.
John T.
(YA Mail provider!?)
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:29:24 +0100, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>What about something like Midnight Commander?
>Of course ISPF/PDF have better features, but some of them are not
>applicable to Linux like systems.
>
>BTW: In fact I miss something similar to Norton (or Midnight) C
What about something like Midnight Commander?
Of course ISPF/PDF have better features, but some of them are not
applicable to Linux like systems.
BTW: In fact I miss something similar to Norton (or Midnight) Commander
in ISPF. I mean zOS Unix file management. Yes, there are at least two of
th
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:27:06 -0500, John Abell wrote:
>I still have and use the SPF/PC GUI Version 4.0 Build 965 circa 2002 running
>on Windows 10. It is too bad it wasn't still available and slightly
>modernized.
>
and for Linux for z?
>-Original Message-
>From: PINION, RICHARD W.
>
I still have and use the SPF/PC GUI Version 4.0 Build 965 circa 2002 running
on Windows 10. It is too bad it wasn't still available and slightly
modernized.
John T. Abell
Tel:800-295-7608Option 4
PresidentÂ
International: 1-416-593-5578 Option 4
E-mail: john.ab...@intnlsoft
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
