Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.

2012-08-16 Thread Mehrshad Manshadi
: Thursday, August 16, 2012 2:12 PM Subject: Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem. It sounds like a hardware problem. Did you check EREP? Of no of SIOs decrease, it is probably due to increased Dasd response times. Did you check this? What component of Resp time increases? Does the other LPAR use the same Dasd

Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.

2012-08-16 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Mehrshad Manshadi wrote: We have a parallel Sysplex with 2 members.one of them is a CPU Z900 (2064 -1C5) with Z/OS 1.8 as operating system and the other is CPU Z900(2064-216) with the same operating system. z/OS 1.8 is unsupported. When we power on reset the CPU and IPL from that,It works

Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.

2012-08-16 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Mehrshad Manshadi wrote: No this happen for all the jobs.Like ( Reorg , load ) Re-org is sometimes heavy on resources, but managable. YMMV. We are using the simple dump just for test. Please describe your 'simple dump'. Memory dump? Dump of volsers? Is it dump by application or by

Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.

2012-08-16 Thread Mehrshad Manshadi
, 2012 2:50 PM Subject: Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem. Mehrshad Manshadi wrote: We have a parallel Sysplex with 2 members.one of them is a CPU Z900 (2064 -1C5) with Z/OS 1.8 as operating system and the other is CPU Z900(2064-216) with the same operating system. z/OS 1.8 is unsupported. When

Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.

2012-08-16 Thread Mehrshad Manshadi
: Thursday, August 16, 2012 3:23 PM Subject: Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem. Mehrshad Manshadi wrote: No this happen for all the jobs.Like ( Reorg , load ) Re-org is sometimes heavy on resources, but managable. YMMV. We are using the simple dump just for test. Please describe your 'simple

Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.

2012-08-16 Thread Knutson, Sam
Hi Manshadi, You might check to see if you have Defined Capacity or Group Capacity setup on the HMC for the LPARs on this CEC. This would fit with the general symptom of IPL and then sometime later seeing a slowdown. You said 12 hours but I want to consider that might be subjective and not

Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.

2012-08-16 Thread Mehrshad Manshadi
Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem. TO: 1 recipientShow Details Well this is interesting:  Excp, Conn are the same!! Apparently there is no difference in the actual I/O. TCB and SIO are higher. What is SIO, where does this come from? What is the relationship between Excp and SIO? Do you use hardware

Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.

2012-08-16 Thread Mehrshad Manshadi
SIO means Start IO and it's came from SDSF panel during execution a job. About hardware compression I should investigate. From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 4:01 PM Subject: Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem. Well

Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.

2012-08-16 Thread Lizette Koehler
Is you z/OS V1.8 system have all maintenance available? There were some issues with SRM and some of the counters going negative. But I do not recall where that was. I would search IBM Link and see if there is any remaining maint you do not have on. Even though z/OS V1.8 is no longer supported,

Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.

2012-08-16 Thread Mike Schwab
Isn't capacity capping a 4 hour rolling average? So wouldn't it kick in before 4 hours? Unless the workload is slow for about 9 hours, then CPU utilization picks up. On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Knutson, Sam sknut...@geico.com wrote: Hi Manshadi, You might check to see if you have