Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

W dniu 2016-07-21 o 16:54, Tim Hare pisze: [...] You can test the difference in speed - find a large dataset (or create one), and FTP it using the OSA network and the other system's non-hipersocket IP address, then FTP the same file using the hipersocket IP address. Actually I did it.

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

I would like to add one other advantage that I took advantage of. When you define your hipersocket network, you can define a very large MTU size for the hipersocket network. This can eliminate a lot of segmentation/re-assembly overhead because the data transmission is broken up into fewer

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:48:37 -0500, Parwez Hamid wrote: >The other point to note about OSes when comparing SMC-D with HiperSockets, >SMC-D is only supported by z/OS whereas HiperSockets is supported by all OSes >that run on z Systems. Right. :-( I am eagerly

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

Hi, Would someone be kind to share your Hipersocket Definitions at your site(Ofcourse masking the critical details). I am though referring http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246816.pdf Just want to get your view on the Dynamic Routing(OMPRCONF) for Hipersocket so that all the

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

In addition to the previous comments, there are some potential advantages to HiperSockets when considering workload portability. You may be able to ignore some OSA-Express physical and logical configuration considerations for inter-LPAR communications on, for example, a DR machine. That could

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

Gil, I believe it is using the Comms Server APIs. Ron -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 8:44 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Real purpose

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 07:51:24 -0700, Ron Hawkins wrote: >We're using them for communication between REXX programs on multiple LPARs, >as well as NJE. > >The REXX programs are used for synchronizing test events. > Do you use RXSOCKET or a custom interface? I miss the CMS Pipelines TCPCLIENT stage.

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 5:24 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Real purpose of hipersocket The more important detractor is that CPU processing to send data via hipersockets is consumed on CPs, while CPU to send data via OAS cards is consumed on the OSA card processors

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

Remember SMC-D is only supported on z13 or z13s at Driver level 27 with z/OS 2.2. With these levels of H/W and OS, when comparing CPU utilization, SMC-D could be a better option than HiperSockets. The other point to note about OSes when comparing SMC-D with HiperSockets, SMC-D is only

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

On 7/5/2016 9:49 PM, Peter wrote: I am still trying to understand from the manual what other benefits I can get from Hipersocket. It's faster than going out to an OSA, but still an order of magnitude slower than SMC-D. If you have that on your hardware, use it! -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

Z/OS 2.2 also provides SMC-D, which I am eager to get a chance to play with. All the convenience and familiarity of sockets, but with most of the TCP/IP overhead stripped out (since the underlying transport layer is reliable). It should have significantly better performance and less CPU

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

Hipersockets are *MUCH MUCH* faster than exiting one LPAR and returning to another via OSA cards. This is done via an internal memory to memory transfer. All of the OSA overhead as well as the network latency are eliminated. However, as all LPAR's are in the same SYSPLEX, all of the data should

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 11:50 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Real purpose of hipersocket Cross Posted Hi We are planning to implement hipersocket for our sysplex

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Martin Packer Sent: 06 July, 2016 14:05 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Real purpose of hipersocket Free but not consequence-free. So obviously, like its distant cousin IC links, the CPU to simulate has to come from somewhere. (Recorded in SMF70PDT

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

ttps://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/mainframe-performance-topics/id1127943573?mt=2 From: "R.S." <r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date: 06/07/2016 12:59 Subject:Re: Real purpose of hipersocket Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <I

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

The real purpose of Hipersockets is fast LAN (TCP/IP) communication between LPARs inside single CPC. With no real add-on hardware like OSA card. With no chance for intruders. With the best performance possible. It cannot replace CTC. However many CTC exploiters can use TCP/IP links instead of

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

You did not mention that the 5 lpars in your sysplex were situated in only 1 machine. Kees. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Sent: 06 July, 2016 8:46 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Real purpose

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

Parwez If you have read my post I was very clear that hipersocket are only for inter LPAR communication. So apart from above is there any compelling reason to use hipersocket if the all the LPARS are in same sysplex. On Jul 6, 2016 12:05 PM, "Parwez Hamid" wrote: >

Re: Real purpose of hipersocket

HiperSockets is for LPAR to LPAR communications ONLY within the same physical system. Have you read the following RedBook: http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246816.pdf and also: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/zosbasics/com.ibm.zos.znetwork/znetwork_85.htm

Real purpose of hipersocket

Cross Posted Hi We are planning to implement hipersocket for our sysplex with 5 LPARS in it. We are already using OSA express card with 10G and our Multi Access Spool for all the 5 LPARs so we cannot even of implementing hipersocket for NJE. If my understanding is correct the hipersocket is