Re: zOSMF takes too long to initialize

2024-10-28 Thread Brian Westerman
I missed that part, I thought it was just a complaint about the slowness of z/OSMF, I didn't realize it was not on a mainframe. I guess it would have been a better question for one of the Hercules boards. Brian -- For IBM-MAIN

Re: zOSMF takes too long to initialize

2024-10-28 Thread Lionel B. Dyck
.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF takes too long to initialize Thanks a lot for the feedback. I'm running the system in a PC with a Ryzen 5 5600x, so, seems I'm pretty limited in hardware capacity. Seems i will have to upgrade to a better CPU model. Regarding the license issue, I am running z

Re: zOSMF takes too long to initialize

2024-10-28 Thread Marco Ulises Cruz Mecate
. Para: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Asunto: Re: zOSMF takes too long to initialize Agreed. I was observing this as part of a z/OS v3.1 update, and a hour after the IPL, while everything else was checking out fine, I noticed z/OSMF was still hogging all the CPU it could get. My experienced pee

Re: zOSMF takes too long to initialize

2024-10-27 Thread roscoe5
Agreed. I was observing this as part of a z/OS v3.1 update, and a hour after the IPL, while everything else was checking out fine, I noticed z/OSMF was still hogging all the CPU it could get. My experienced peers said that was common, and this shop needed a bigger box and a zIIP. Sent from [Pro

Re: zOSMF takes too long to initialize

2024-10-27 Thread Brian Westerman
I actually reported this problem to IBM when one of my clients had a z/13s, and was told that their testing was performed on a 400Mip box (with a zIIP engine, and also without one), their response time was acceptable, but my clients took about 20 minutes to initialize and about 45 minutes to get

Re: zOSMF takes too long to initialize

2024-10-27 Thread Darrold Usher
rying this, let you incur the wrath of Big Blue. > > Regards, > David > > > On 10/27/2024 21:26, Marco Cruz wrote: > > Hello comunity, > > > > I'm testing zOS 2.5 in an Hercules emulator and I realized that zOSMF is > taking too long to complete ini

Re: zOSMF takes too long to initialize

2024-10-27 Thread David Spiegel
Hi Marco, In case you are unaware, IBM does not license z/OS to run on Hercules. I would not publicize trying this, let you incur the wrath of Big Blue. Regards, David On 10/27/2024 21:26, Marco Cruz wrote: Hello comunity, I'm testing zOS 2.5 in an Hercules emulator and I realized that

zOSMF takes too long to initialize

2024-10-27 Thread Marco Cruz
Hello comunity, I'm testing zOS 2.5 in an Hercules emulator and I realized that zOSMF is taking too long to complete initialization. The log in the following link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qQXp6CUfiXDKgHIwTYDBR1s-K0kCxgde/view?usp=drive_link I noticed that java response ti

zOSMF takes too long to initialize

2024-10-27 Thread Marco Cruz
Hello comunity, I'm testing zOS 2.5 in an Hercules emulator and I realized that zOSMF is taking too long to complete initialization. I attach the log of zOSMF started task. I noticed that java response time is relatively high, for example, simple commands like "java -version"

zOSMF takes too long to initialize

2024-10-27 Thread Marco Cruz
Hello comunity, I'm testing zOS 2.5 in an Hercules emulator and I realized that zOSMF is taking too long to complete initialization. I attach the log of zOSMF started task. I noticed that java response time is relatively high, for example, simple commands like "java -version"

Re: Zosmf workflow auto detect

2024-10-21 Thread Marna WALLE
Peter, There is some detection (not complete, but some) that is done in the first z/OS Upgrade Workflow step called "Discover z/OS features in use". For each step that was associated with a PTF that had actions associated with them that you've already seen (when you installed the PTF and did an

Zosmf workflow auto detect

2024-10-21 Thread Peter
Hello Good morning Is it true that zosmf workflow discovery can automatically detect the LPAR and advise the accurate upgrade step specific to my environment? Peter -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: Zosmf installations

2024-10-08 Thread Allan Staller
Classification: Confidential I have never implemented z/OSMF on a production LPAR. Others may have. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2024 11:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Zosmf installations [CAUTION

Re: Zosmf installations

2024-10-06 Thread Peter
Brian, Our Production LPAR is not same as Sandbox. i Believe zosmf workflow detects based on the environment and gives us the workflow right ? Please correct me if i am wrong. On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 9:16 AM Brian Westerman < 06ba4ed225c9-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > I

Re: Zosmf installations

2024-10-06 Thread Brian Westerman
It is easy, but there really isn't any way to NOT do the RACF parts. But if you are not going to 'use" zosmf in production then there is no reason to install it there either. You really only need on instance per site. ---

Re: Zosmf installations

2024-10-06 Thread Steve Beaver
t; Hello > > Good evening > > I am going to perform zosmf installations for the first time. > > Going through the zosmf installations I can see there are some racf classes > are getting activated. Our production LPAR are not same as test lpar. > > So to get a prope

Zosmf installations

2024-10-05 Thread Peter
Hello Good evening I am going to perform zosmf installations for the first time. Going through the zosmf installations I can see there are some racf classes are getting activated. Our production LPAR are not same as test lpar. So to get a proper zosmf workflow for production lpar upgrade i was

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-20 Thread Jousma, David
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Shaffer, Terri <017d5f778222-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2024 1:27:52 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations Hey so my SMS coding of ACS routines need

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-20 Thread Shaffer, Terri
, 2024 12:08 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. That's a very good point. Normally IBM is much better than this when it comes to products that you ha

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-17 Thread Brian Westerman
That's a very good point. Normally IBM is much better than this when it comes to products that you have no choice about using. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-17 Thread Shaffer, Terri
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shaffer, Terri Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 9:41 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-17 Thread Roberto Halais
Senior Systems Engineer, > > > z/OS Support: > > > ACIWorldwide – Telecommuter > > > H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592) > > > terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List O

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-17 Thread Colin Paice
gt; > > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > > Of Brian Westerman > > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 1:10 AM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations > > > > E

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-17 Thread Shaffer, Terri
Engineer, z/OS Support: ACIWorldwide – Telecommuter H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592) terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mike Shaw Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 9:16 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF - Installing z

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-17 Thread Mike Shaw
rri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Brian Westerman > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 1:10 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-17 Thread Shaffer, Terri
Behalf Of Brian Westerman Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 1:10 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. The problem with reporting these types of issues is that they

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-16 Thread Brian Westerman
The problem with reporting these types of issues is that they appear to be completely ignored. In my case, I have been told several times that since i have a workaround, there is no reason to open an issue. So now I just don't even bother to report them. I just make a note for the next time.

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-16 Thread Shaffer, Terri
...@aciworldwide.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Kurt Quackenbush Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2024 8:29 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-16 Thread Kurt Quackenbush
> In job IZUD04RN, they try to alter the name which is failing for me because > the end name is already cataloged. If a data set with that name is already cataloged, then z/OSMF should have displayed an error and not generated that deployment JCL. Off hand I don't know why your situation cause

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-16 Thread Shaffer, Terri
...@aciworldwide.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Brian Westerman Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2024 2:52 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-16 Thread Shaffer, Terri
neer, z/OS Support: ACIWorldwide – Telecommuter H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592) terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Brian Westerman Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2024 2:52 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF - Installin

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-15 Thread Brian Westerman
z/OSMF is not in it's infancy, it's been around for several years now, it's new to force z/OS installs with it. I have now installed my 22nd z/OS install with z/OSMF, (hundreds with Serverpak) and I can tell you that It has gone increasingly downhill over especially the past year or so. The ab

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-15 Thread Jousma, David
Ok, so I will speak out to my positive experiences…. I’m personally not in favor of a GUI for the sake of a GUI without bringing advantages to the table. But I have become a ZOSMF fan more recently. Serverpac – On the ISPF panels, old process, I could have the entire process laid down, and

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-15 Thread Shaffer, Terri
frame Discussion List On Behalf Of william janulin Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 10:52 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. I thought this product was ti simplif

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-15 Thread william janulin
nframe Discussion List On Behalf Of rpinion865 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 8:56 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. When all else fails, use a sledge

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-15 Thread Shaffer, Terri
) terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of rpinion865 Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 8:56 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless

Re: zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-15 Thread rpinion865
When all else fails, use a sledge hammer! Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Wednesday, May 15th, 2024 at 8:50 AM, Shaffer, Terri <017d5f778222-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > So this is my first real time using zOSMF for a software installation. So I >

zOSMF - Installing z/OS 3.1 Observations

2024-05-15 Thread Shaffer, Terri
So this is my first real time using zOSMF for a software installation. So I have a few complaints. First No SSA is being used, IBM decided to tack on a .# to every dataset, HATE this and I modified it. I have SMS rules already defined for SYS1SSA, so I changed my configuration layout to my

Re: zOSMF startup on 3.1

2024-04-22 Thread Pommier, Rex
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF startup on 3.1 Seems to say here that you need JAVA V17 on z/OS V3.1: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/3.1.0?topic=installation-software-requirements-running-zos-31__;!!KjMRP1Ixj6eLE0Fj

Re: zOSMF startup on 3.1

2024-04-22 Thread Wissink, Brad
515-231-1511 bwiss...@sfgmembers.com | www.SammonsFinancialGroup.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 12:52 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] zOSMF startup on 3.1 Hello list, Just IPLed z/

Re: zOSMF startup on 3.1

2024-04-19 Thread Brian Westerman
doing CHMOD a lot. I eventually got it working. The next couple of installs still had issues but not as many, but as they fixed issues with ZOSMF, they created more issues with the other parts of the install. It never seems to get any better, it's almost like they are moving the problems

Re: zOSMF startup on 3.1

2024-04-19 Thread Jousma, David
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Pommier, Rex Date: Friday, April 19, 2024 at 1:52 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: zOSMF startup on 3.1 Hello list, Just IPLed z/OS 3. 1 on our sandbox and tried to start zOSMF. The angel process started but the server process fails

zOSMF startup on 3.1

2024-04-19 Thread Pommier, Rex
Hello list, Just IPLed z/OS 3.1 on our sandbox and tried to start zOSMF. The angel process started but the server process fails. I compared file permissions in the /global/zosmf directories between my 2.4 system and 3.1 system and they're the same. The server is failing in the IZUSVR1

Re: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx

2023-12-08 Thread Robert S. Hansel (RSH)
ance - APR 8-12, 2024 - RACF - Securing z/OS UNIX - FEB 26 - MAR 1, 2024 - -Original Message- Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2023 08:39:08 +0400 From:Peter Subject: Re: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx Hello Rob Thank yo

Re: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx

2023-12-06 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 08:44:01 +, Rob Scott wrote: >Mark > >The original APAR (PH49811) that introduced the ISFNTCNV tool and the >ISFRACEX sample RACF starter set was rolled back to z/OS 2.4. > Hi Rob, Thanks. I'll have a look and pass on the information to people who have been coming to

Re: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx

2023-12-06 Thread Rob Scott
work on z/OS 2.5+” presentation) to all customers attempting the migration. Rob Scott Rocket Software From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 9:33 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx EXTERNAL EMAIL A

Re: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx

2023-12-05 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 15:33:16 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote: >My only real complaint about all of this is that it caught me by surprise. >The requirement >was announced at the last possible time it could - the last quarterly >announcement for z/OS 2.4 >enhancements (I think) as a statement of dire

Re: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx

2023-12-05 Thread Mark Zelden
is doing under the >covers for the various panels and actions, the migration makes much more sense. > >I hope the above is helpful > >Rob Scott >Rocket Software > >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of >Peter >Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2023 4:09 PM >To: IBM-

Re: zOSMF install

2023-12-05 Thread Art Gutowski
gt; >I know I need zOSMF to install 3.1. My question is, in essence, can (or >should) I order and install a stand-alone zOSMF 3.1 and use that for my z/OS >3.1 install or am I better off (or is this the only option) installing zOSMF >2.4 before even heading down the 3.1 path

Re: zOSMF install

2023-12-04 Thread Allan Staller
Classification: Confidential Short answer. Yes. Do it now. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 10:07 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: zOSMF install [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization

Re: zOSMF install

2023-12-04 Thread Pommier, Rex
Hi Kurt, Thank you. That is exactly the answer I needed. We installed 2.4 with a ServerPac and as I am just starting down the implementation path of zOSMF, my manager asked me to find out if we should try to get the 3.1 zOSMF stand-alone and install that first. Your response confirmed that

Re: zOSMF install

2023-12-04 Thread Kurt Quackenbush
> I know I need zOSMF to install 3.1. My question is, in essence, can (or > should) I order and install a stand-alone zOSMF 3.1 and use that for my z/OS > 3.1 install or am I better off (or is this the only option) installing zOSMF > 2.4 before even heading down the 3.1 path? Did

Re: zOSMF install

2023-12-04 Thread Pommier, Rex
Hi Richard, I know I need zOSMF to install 3.1. My question is, in essence, can (or should) I order and install a stand-alone zOSMF 3.1 and use that for my z/OS 3.1 install or am I better off (or is this the only option) installing zOSMF 2.4 before even heading down the 3.1 path? Thanks

Re: zOSMF install

2023-12-04 Thread Richard McIntosh
You need zOSMF to install 3.1. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 10:07 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] : zOSMF install Hi all, Just looking for opinions on this. Scenario is we&#x

zOSMF install

2023-12-04 Thread Pommier, Rex
Hi all, Just looking for opinions on this. Scenario is we're running z/OS 2.4. We don't have zOSMF installed. Sometime next year we're going to migrate to 3.1. Would we be better off installing/implementing zOSMF 2.4 today in preparation for installing 3.1 or should we in

Re: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx

2023-12-04 Thread Rob Scott
helpful Rob Scott Rocket Software From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2023 4:09 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx EXTERNAL EMAIL Well I was able to find a utility developed by rocket software ISFACR and it helped

Re: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx

2023-12-03 Thread Rob Scott
half of Peter Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2023 4:10:16 pm To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx EXTERNAL EMAIL Well I was able to find a utility developed by rocket software ISFACR and it helped me to generate some commands which were required as part of my m

Re: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx

2023-12-03 Thread Peter
is showing its age a bit. We have some more >> recent (and much simpler) tools and processes now. >> >> Rob Scott >> Rocket Software >> >> Sent from Samsung Mobile on O2 >> Sent from Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> >> ___

Re: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx

2023-12-02 Thread Peter
__ > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf > of Peter > Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2023 9:31:26 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx > > EXTERNAL EMAIL > > > > > > Hello All > > Good morning &g

Re: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx

2023-12-02 Thread Seymour J Metz
: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx Peter, Can I strongly suggest you instigate a project to activate OPERCMDS (and JESSPOOL if not already active). ISFPRMx just controls actions within SDSF and does not preclude any semi-capable programmer from writing code to

Re: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx

2023-12-02 Thread Rob Scott
DU Subject: zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx EXTERNAL EMAIL Hello All Good morning I have planned to install zOSMF in our test LPAR. Our SDSF uses its own security features using ISFPRMXX and I can see zOSMF has its own IZUSEC jobs where it activates OPERCMDS class. We never activated OPERCMDS

zOSMF install - SDSF ISFPRMxx

2023-12-02 Thread Peter
Hello All Good morning I have planned to install zOSMF in our test LPAR. Our SDSF uses its own security features using ISFPRMXX and I can see zOSMF has its own IZUSEC jobs where it activates OPERCMDS class. We never activated OPERCMDS instead we manage using ISFPRMXX PARMLIB member. Is there

Re: zOSMF Workflows

2023-09-23 Thread Marna WALLE
Hi David, Frank Kyne, in one of his monthly newsletters, was noticing the same thing: it is hard to have a full "view" of where all the WF service definition files are "sourced", for both ones you've used and ones you are looking for. Happily, though, WF does remember individually where the sou

Re: zOSMF Workflows

2023-09-22 Thread Jousma, David
Thanks for that Kurt! Dave Jousma Vice President | Director, Technology Engineering From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Kurt Quackenbush Date: Friday, September 22, 2023 at 8:40 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF Workflows > There is something somew

Re: zOSMF Workflows

2023-09-22 Thread Kurt Quackenbush
> There is something somewhat rudimentary in the create workflow screen with > the pulldown, but I dont know if thats zOSMF doing that, or the browser doing > that. But then that would likely be just for me? z/OSMF, not your browser, manages the pulldown of previous workflow definiti

Re: zOSMF Workflows

2023-09-22 Thread Patrick Loftus
frame Discussion List On Behalf Of Dave Jousma Sent: Friday, September 22, 2023 12:50 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: zOSMF Workflows All, I have been thinking about this for awhile,, but cant seem to find the answer. So asking my fellow listers if I am missing something. Workflows are

zOSMF Workflows

2023-09-22 Thread Dave Jousma
definition files that have been used or might be used again? I dont see that? Am I missing something? There is something somewhat rudimentary in the create workflow screen with the pulldown, but I dont know if thats zOSMF doing that, or the browser doing that. But then that would likely be just

Re: zOSMF

2023-06-14 Thread Shaffer, Terri
IWorldwide - Telecommuter H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592) terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Kurt J. Quackenbush Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 2:43 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not clic

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-31 Thread Marna WALLE
Hi Phil, If you are not interested in looking at videos to see the flow in action, the complete documentation (with Helps you see on the display) are on IBM Documentation. The "Model" function can be found here: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=wizard-model-page -Marna WALLE z/O

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-31 Thread Steve Thompson
This is why I like the way Linux handles things. I can have two different Linux installs, as along as I have two different partitions or disks on which to put those installs. And then the user data is off in /home which can be yet another single or group of partitions on one or more disks. By

Re: [EXTERNAL] zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Matt Hogstrom
I believe what you stated below is the major problem. z/OS systems have years of process, embedded meta information in PROCs, file names, HLQs, etc. Its not a “fresh disk install” its about existing processes and procedures, time to migrate, the risk involved in making the alignment happen and

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Pommier, Rex
ut they do seem to go out of their way to hide things. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 3:28 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF How about the last time that the menu

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Seymour J Metz
an [t...@tombrennansoftware.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 4:37 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF Funny! Yes, that sounds like the same conversation I had with XXX company and the product, not necessarily that number of X's but could be :) You're right

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Phil Smith III
FWIW (perhaps nothing), IBM solved the upgrade problem ~30 years ago for VM by separating the operating system nucleus (kernel) from the filesystem. That is, you can have multiple copies of the VM nucleus on various CMS (the end-user environment) minidisks, which CP (the hypervisor) knows how to

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Tom Brennan
bject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF I can't remember the last time a Windows/Linux install failed. I do remember the last time an ISV z/OS install failed, and when I called for help the support person said, "Don't worry about it, *everybody* calls when installing this particular pr

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Seymour J Metz
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Shaffer, Terri [017d5f778222-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 10:24 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF I have to disagree. First lets talk about the migration guide an

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Tom Brennan
s documented. Here, let me walk you through my process." His worked, but it was nothing like the document. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Brennan Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 12:20 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNA

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Seymour J Metz
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF Kids can install, because basically one FMID, and if it doesn’t work, good luck. How many FMID components make up core z/OS? Maybe if IBM made it one FMID you could install like android. I can use ISRFIND or ISRDDN, to find many thing

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Seymour J Metz
metz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Tom Brennan [t...@tombrennansoftware.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 1:19 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF I can't remember the last time a Windows/Linux inst

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Pommier, Rex
was nothing like the document. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Brennan Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 12:20 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF I can't remember the last time a Windows/Linux install failed.

Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Kurt J. Quackenbush
> > Is there anything easy we/IBM could do to move in the right direction? > > Examine the current system, > create a script to set the equivalent values for z/OSMF? Oh, so just like the Model function in z/OSMF Software Management? When you install software, like z/OS, using z/OSMF, during the C

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Tom Brennan
gineer, z/OS Support: ACIWorldwide – Telecommuter H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592) terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Brennan Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 11:20 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread John McKown
C(412-519-2592) > terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Tom Brennan > Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 11:20 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do

Re: [EXTERNAL] zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Tom Brennan
I agree with that. On 5/30/2023 10:27 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: I can’t speak for IBM but I believe that z/OSMF is part of the strategy to help guide folks onto a consistent approach. The challenge is that policies, procedures and configuration options have existed for years across thousands

Re: [EXTERNAL] zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Matt Hogstrom
I can’t speak for IBM but I believe that z/OSMF is part of the strategy to help guide folks onto a consistent approach. The challenge is that policies, procedures and configuration options have existed for years across thousands of customers. The cloud refers to servers as cattle because they

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Tom Brennan
ter H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592) terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Brennan Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 11:20 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or op

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Shaffer, Terri
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 11:20 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. So how come my kids can install apps and updates to their Windows and Mac machines, and I can work

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Doug
; To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Sent: 30-May-23 10:04:12 Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF People feel that z/OSMF is not meeting their needs. Looking at the positive sideIf we wanted to get future z/OS newbies up to speed very quickly (1 month) What should IBM and us users be doing? 1. Ma

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Lionel B. Dyck
ay, May 30, 2023 10:20 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF So how come my kids can install apps and updates to their Windows and Mac machines, and I can work with Linux with no formal training? For example, I don't need to hunt down SYS3.MY2013.PARMLIB(PROG46),

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Tom Brennan
LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 9:04 AM Colin Paice wrote: People feel that z/OSMF is not meeting their needs. Looking at the positive sideIf we wanted to

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Shaffer, Terri
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 9:04 AM Colin Paice wrote: > > People feel that z/OSMF is not meeting their needs. Looking at the > positive sideIf we

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Mike Schwab
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 9:04 AM Colin Paice wrote: > > People feel that z/OSMF is not meeting their needs. Looking at the positive > sideIf we wanted to get future z/OS newbies up to speed very quickly (1 > month) What should IBM and us users be doing? > >1. Making better use of existing

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Colin Paice
ist On Behalf > Of Shaffer, Terri > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2023 12:34 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF > > [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust > the sender, Don't click links or open attachments as it may

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-30 Thread Allan Staller
Classification: Confidential Agreed! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shaffer, Terri Sent: Friday, May 26, 2023 12:34 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you

Re: zOSMF

2023-05-28 Thread Seymour J Metz
A typo; should be GUI. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of David Crayford Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2023 10:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF What’s CUI? A container platform? > On 28 May 2023, at 9:57 pm, W Mainfr

Re: zOSMF

2023-05-28 Thread David Crayford
What’s CUI? A container platform? > On 28 May 2023, at 9:57 pm, W Mainframe > <01304632a58d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > Hi,Just some few words..:I hate zosmf and zowe... :)And yes... I have some > good applications running on CUI... No plans to migrate.

Re: zOSMF

2023-05-28 Thread W Mainframe
Hi,Just some few words..:I hate zosmf and zowe... :)And yes... I have some good applications running on CUI... No plans to migrate... :)Dan Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Sunday, May 28, 2023, 8:26 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: The problem is not the D&D interface; the Devil is in

Re: zOSMF

2023-05-28 Thread Seymour J Metz
jzuk...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 26, 2023 5:31 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: zOSMF The real problem, as I see it, is that drag and drop interfaces move you away from the need to know what you are doing. A long time ago, the first MVS install that I did on my own, took me a few mo

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-27 Thread Brian Westerman
Personally I think z/OSMF is a big step in the wrong direction for IBM, especially since they made it a the only choice. Before them it was also pretty much just a single choice, but you had a lot of flexibility that you no longer have with the newer method. There appears to be no good reason

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: zOSMF

2023-05-27 Thread Joel C. Ewing
tatus of every module before and after the change to be known. If zOSMF ever becomes such a black box that that SysProgs lose the clarity of what data sets must be carefully protected as critical to system integrity, that would be badness. Windows core system maintenance occurs mostly at the

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >