I don't think IBM could legally charge different prices to different user
s. I'm SURE their lawyers
would let them. I guess that was a rhetorical question on my part.
But I think Tony Thigpen got it right:
Hardware sales
Hardware sales
and even
Hardware sales
I think that the only reason VM is
It happened to me the last time we did a power-on reset, but I can't remember
the exact circumstance. I think the SE who was doing the POR selected a
default configuration or something like that. (Not his fault.)
Jon
BTW, after the first time that I set up using the panels,
I exported th
I am home on vacation, so I can't check this right now, but...
Isn't there a "scroll bar" on the side of the panel to scroll down
to additional sessions?
I have set up much more than 16.
BTW, after the first time that I set up using the panels,
I exported the config file, and then edited it on a
Tony Thigpen wrote:
Hardware sales
Hardware sales
and even
Hardware sales
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Stephen Frazier
Sent: 04/17/2006 02:54 PM
I said that Alan probably knows what the real reason is that IBM will
not license z/VM V5 on Flex to commercial users. He may
Doesn't the DDR dump need to be made with the FTR32K option for
this to work?
>How about:
>
>//COPYDDR JOB whatever
>//COPY EXEC PGM=IEBGENER
>//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
>//SYSUT1 DD DSN=DDRTAPE.IN,LABEL=(1,NL),DISP=(OLD,KEEP),
>//VOL=SER=DDRTPI,UNIT=3480, (or UNIT=whatever in yo
Steve,
Have you not figured it out yet?
Hardware sales
Hardware sales
and even
Hardware sales
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Stephen Frazier
Sent: 04/17/2006 02:54 PM
I said that Alan probably knows what the real reason is that IBM will
not license z/VM V5 on Flex to commerc
I said that Alan probably knows what the real reason is that IBM will not
license z/VM V5 on Flex to commercial users. He may not know, but that is
unlikely. IBM will not tell their customers why they will not sell them a
license to run z/VM V5.
At WAVV on Saturday a salesman from IBM tried to
Hello David,
Thanks. You are confirming what I have been finding out.
I appreciate the info.
Ed Martin
Aultman Health Foundation
330-588-4723
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ext. 40441
>> -Original Message-
>> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
>> Behalf Of Dav
How about:
//COPYDDR JOB whatever
//COPY EXEC PGM=IEBGENER
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSUT1 DD DSN=DDRTAPE.IN,LABEL=(1,NL),DISP=(OLD,KEEP),
//VOL=SER=DDRTPI,UNIT=3480, (or UNIT=whatever in your shop)
//DCB=(RECFM=U,BLKSIZE=32760)
//SYSUT2 DD DSN=DDRTAPE.OUT,LABEL=
I am trying to copy a VM DDR created tape.
I am trying to use Z/OS to copy from a 3480 to a 3590 tape.
Can i do this?
I need this in a disaster.
What JCL should I use?
I tryed DITTO but it did not work.
We are having a slight problem when attempting to configure the OSA ICC
on our new Z890.
We can configure 0-15 ports just fine. It's the 16-31 ports that are a
problem. Port 16-31 are not showing up on the configuration screen. How
do I get ports above 15 configured?
Forgive me if my question is
> As you well know the Flex is a z/Architecture box. Many developers run
> z/VM V5
> on it today. This you know also. IBM will not allow commercial users
to
> license
> z/VM V5 on a Flex machine. You probably know the reason but for some
> reason you
> will not tell your customers the truth.
Easy
Sorry for the delay in responding to this. You might look into using
the ALTTAPE parm to have DDR "spill" to another tape volume
automagically. This works, but unfortunately it ties up TWO tape drives
for what is essentially a single tape dump "stream".
I modified DDR so the EOT condition trigge
> > 1) I will be running in LPAR mode on the z890.
You don't get a choice. There is no basic mode on these boxes.
> > 2) Which means that I can have one V=R machine without the
> > I/O pass-through. So is V=R really any good?
> > 3) No V=F support.
Pre
Hello Tony,
This is a 'done-deal'. I am not impressed with our EMC support
people.
I do like the box. And there are good support people out in
Pittsburgh that have stepped up and gotten us the info.
Ed Martin
Aultman Health Foundation
330-588-4723
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ext. 40441
As you well know the Flex is a z/Architecture box. Many developers run z/VM V5
on it today. This you know also. IBM will not allow commercial users to license
z/VM V5 on a Flex machine. You probably know the reason but for some reason you
will not tell your customers the truth.
[EMAIL PROTECTE
With the z890 I just stopped using V=R. I saw no appreciable difference.
Edward M. Martin wrote:
Hello everyone,
Just some more questions about the z890 and z/VM 4.3.
1) I will be running in LPAR mode on the z890.
2) Which means that I can have one V=R machin
Review the option of a Flex-Cub based dasd box. You could then add tape
and other emulation if you wanted to. Should be cheaper than the EMC path.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Edward M. Martin
Sent: 04/17/2006 10:34 AM
Hello Everyone,
I appreciate all the info, hi
Hello everyone,
Just some more questions about the z890 and z/VM 4.3.
1) I will be running in LPAR mode on the z890.
2) Which means that I can have one V=R machine without the
I/O pass-through. So is V=R really any good?
3) No V=F suppor
Hello Everyone,
I appreciate all the info, hints, and tips from everyone.
My game plan has been altered a little.
We are on a MP3000 using EMC Symetrix and Internal dasd.
1) Apply the last RSU to z/VM4.3 which will give me all the
required maintenance (I can
> The fact that other
> customers with large IBM machines are paying much less for version 5
would
> not
> matter. When and if a company grows its flex box to where it
approaches
> the size
> of a small IBM box, then having VM cheaper on the IBM box will make a
> difference. It will encourage users
Wayne Driscoll wrote:
> Alan,
> The point I think you are missing is that z/Architecture CAN TECHNICALL
Y run
> on a FLEX box, it's just that IBM REFUSES to allow FLEX z/Architecture
boxes
> to non PWD customers, so they are forced to either purchase the smalles
t
> z/890 box, plus a small Shark,
On Sunday, 04/16/2006 at 11:32 EST, Wayne Driscoll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan,
> The point I think you are missing is that z/Architecture CAN TECHNICALLY
run
> on a FLEX box, it's just that IBM REFUSES to allow FLEX z/Architecture
boxes
> to non PWD customers, so they are forced to either
23 matches
Mail list logo
