We were running 4.3. We are running 5.2 now. We didn't notice any increase in PAGE pack use, i.e, increased paging or physically using more page space.
PAGE space allocation remained the same.
Steve G.
Schuh, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System
Thank you to all that replied. I guess I was wrong and it can be done. Bu
t
if done, it is done poorly.
I'll do some reseach on Bochs(?) and report to my management with what yo
u
said and what I found out.
thanks
Mace
You're welcome, Mace.
Information on Bochs can be found here:
http://bochs.sourceforge.net/
Let us know what your research reveals and how your management reacts.
DJ
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Larry_Macioce?= wrote:
Thank you to all that replied. I guess I was wrong and it can be done. But
if done,
What model exactly and how much?
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Antoon Vekeman
Sent: Thu 8/10/2006 2:53 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: MP3000 for sale
We have migrated our MP3000-P30 to a FLEX/ES environment. We offer the =
MP3000
On 8/10/06, Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the answer, in any practical terms, is no, you can't do that.
Unless the new POO has a Start Intel Execution instruction ;-p
Wrong is not a fair description. I can put my love spuds in the open mouth
of a lion and hit him on the head. If you said I couldn't you'd be wrong,
but it makes about as much sense as trying to run x86 apps on a zSeries.
-Original Message-
Thank you to all that replied. I guess I was
LOVE SPUDShahahahahaha My youngest son(when playing ball and get
hit) calls them Mcnuggets
I take it as putting a Yugo engine in a Lambo. It will make the car run
but not well.
Thanks
Mace
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Does Standalone Dump use the same formula? Is it smart enough to
understand CP control blocks, or does it just dump all of storage?
Standalone Dump dumps all resident, non-zero pages. This includes both
CP and non-CP pages. The VM Dump Tool recognizes that CP has been dumped
and allows the same
On Thursday, 08/10/2006 at 07:24 AST, Imler, Steven J
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can use the VM:Tape USERSECR EXIT (assembler only) for a non-RACF
solution.
If you can issue CMS commands in the exit, then you can custom-build a
RACF solution. The program would have to take as input the
On Thursday, 08/10/2006 at 10:49 ZE2, Colin Allinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We use RACF as our ESM and I wondered if there was any API interface
that could
be called by user code to check validity of an access to a resource (I
am not
aware of such a beast).
Yes. You will have to write
If RACF defers to you, what do you do? Also, you can use generic
profiles
to, for example, deny access to all tapes except those specifically
defined and PERMITed.
Continue with normal VM:Tape authorization processing, which includes
calling the USERSECR EXIT if the site has coded one and
On Thursday, 08/10/2006 at 10:42 AST, Imler, Steven J
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If RACF defers to you, what do you do? Also, you can use generic
profiles
to, for example, deny access to all tapes except those specifically
defined and PERMITed.
Continue with normal VM:Tape authorization
RESERVE/RELEASE on the volume in response to an ENQ/DEQ. Some tape
managers (e.g. IBM Tape Manager for z/VM) can talk to DFSMSrmm on z/OS
if
you want to use the z/OS tape catalog. I would guess that VM:Tape has
an
equivalent function. (JR?)
Unfortunately ... not yet. I'm sure Mike W.
Jim,
Sorry for the misunderstanding ...
You are correct. The only system that can UNASSIGN the drive is the
system that ASSIGNED it to itself (the purpose of the ASSIGN in the
nutshell).
The on one system reference I mentioned in my response to Alan was
relative to the fact that his site runs
More curiosity than anything. That seemed to be a drastic change in a number
and I was wondering if it was normal or an indicator of a potential problem. I
suspect it was the change in algorithm. Also, we have seen the number of TPF
users increase by over 25% since we removed the 2G constraint.
On Aug 10, 2006, at 6:56 AM, Macioce, Larry wrote:
I take it as putting a Yugo engine in a Lambo. It will make the car
run
but not well.
More like putting a moped engine in a locomotive, really.
Adam
I had a similar problem . I upgraded my hcd but it didn't look as if it
took. What you can try is
1)go into your hcd main panel and go to option 7(Query supported
hardware and installed UIMs)
2)then 1(List supported processors)page through it and it will show you
all processors that can be
Yes. You just need to add the appropriate parm to the IOCP invocation to
tell it which parser to use.
IXP is used to cause IOCP to write an IOCDS for an non-EMIF processor
IZP is used to cause IOCP to write an IOCDS for an EMIF-capable processor
IYP is used to cause IOCP to write an IOCDS for a
You could use the ICP version of IOCP. It supports 2094.
Brian Nielsen
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:10:45 -0400, Mark Pace, Mainline Information Syste
m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should I be able to run the IOCP module against an IOCP deck created for
a
different processor than I am currently
Sorry, I only use Hiper sockets from MainFrameLInux to z/OS so no coding
in VM. BUT, in case ya haven't seen it before, try this
Redbook...
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246816.pdf
At 01:38 PM 8/10/2006, you wrote:
Anyone have a sample DTCPARMS
file they would share with me for a
Hello Mark,
Yes you should be able to
IOCP filename ( ICP or XXX and then other parameters
From the IOCP manual
ICP specifies that the ICP version of IOCP is to process the
command options and input file to generate an IOCDS.
ICP refers to the first three characters of the
We ran into something like this when we went from 4.4 to 5.1. We
actually
ran out of page space. IBM
pointed us to a page in a manual that said we should have enough page
spa
ce for the sum of the size
all our virtual machines. We Bit the bullet and got more page packs.
I
don't remember
Christine--I'm not an MVS type, so I don't really know much about MVS's PDS
or PDSE support. I have heard, tho, that the PACKLIB support in FCOPY from
the VM download page can be, in some ways, thought to be similiar (is that
enough of a disclaimer?) to an MVS PDS. I've used FCOPY and the
:nick.TCPIP:type.server
:class.stack
:attach.0600-0602,0700-0702
0600-0602 are OSA devices
0700-0702 are Hipersocket devices.
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700 Summit Lake Drive
Tallahassee, FL. 32317
Office: 850.219.5184
Thanks. I was trying to use two lines instead of one. That worked
wonderfully.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Pace, Mainline Information System
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 1:43 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Don Angle here pointed out that the VARY OFF GLOBAL won't work if the
system that holds the ASSIGN is down. We think the ASSIGN bit gets reset
when the system is IPLed, but not before.
Is this correct?
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:23:06 -0400, Imler, Steven J [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jim,
Sorry
Could be even more brutal and get 3420 drives. Then you didn't have to
bother trying to figure out who owned the ASSIGNment bit. Everyone did :-)
Jim
At 03:08 PM 8/10/2006, you wrote:
Then there is the brute force method of IMLing the control unit.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM
But the cartridges wouldn't fit.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jim Bohnsack
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 12:19 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Who has the tape drive ASSIGNed?
To list(s);
We are in the process of migrating a VM/VSE system
that currently uses the 3494 VTS. The user is
currently in the process of phasing out the VTS.
However, going forward, we want to utilize the 3494
ATL without using the VTS.
Currently I have these three machines down. At some
In theory, you should only need to update the list of real device
addresses and the Library Name(s) (and serial number) if any of those
items change from what they were when running with the 3494 VTS, in each
product's configuration files.
JR (Steven) Imler
CA
Senior Software Engineer
Tel: +1
Isn't the PDS(E) file store somewhat like a CMS minidisk file structure,
in that there are two directories at the beginning of the space, and
files can be added, deleted and modified *without* the need for a
separate compression step every now and then?
DJ
Jim Bohnsack wrote:
Christine--I'm
Thanks for pointing that out, Julie. I really dislike the idea of using
names for things like error messages if the software still returns a
numeric code when it fails.
I think I see what the problem here ismake sure that you have the LE
run time library (SCEERUN) available at
SHUTTRAP could be easily modified to run as a CMS MT root child
process.
The new code would run as a separate process within CMS and not
interfere
with concurrent processes. I use the root child trick to run CMS
commmands
as background tasks. There are some restrictions for background
33 matches
Mail list logo
