Re: Question re: Hercules

2006-10-18 Thread Jeff Gribbin, EDS
NO you can not run VM - any version - under Hercules. Now, this is one of those, But why would you want to do this? questions , but howabout running z/VM in a Hercules that was itself running under Linux in a virtual machine that was being delivered using the same z/VM a s was running,

Re: Question re: Hercules

2006-10-18 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 10/18/2006 at 08:19 EST, Jeff Gribbin, EDS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but howabout running z/VM in a Hercules that was itself running under Linux in a virtual machine that was being delivered using the same z/VM as was running, down there - and is, of course, properly and fully

Re: Question re: Hercules

2006-10-18 Thread David Boyes
but howabout running z/VM in a Hercules that was itself running under Linux in a virtual machine that was being delivered using the same z/VM as was running, down there - and is, of course, properly and fully licensed. It's been done. Not wisely, but too well... 8-) Not entirely

BM shares rally as earnings rise 47%

2006-10-18 Thread Dave Jones
http://custom.marketwatch.com/custom/myway-com/news-story.asp?guid={FBC4F784-8776-48A5-A209-A7250CBF3F9F} Hardware revenue grew 9%, or 8% when adjusted for currency, to $5.6 billion compared with $5.1 billion a year ago. Sales of the System Z series was the most impressive, up 25%

Re: Sharing unassigned tape

2006-10-18 Thread Kim Goldenberg
Shimon Lebowitz wrote: On 17 Oct 2006 at 14:52, Romanowski, John (OFT) wrote: Shimon, Is the 5.2 system a guest of 4.4 (not sure from your post)? If so, I would DFSMSRM MOUNT the tape to the guest userid and on 5.2 system just ATTACH the tape drive to MAINT at 181 and use the virtual

FW: Google launches search engine for finding source code

2006-10-18 Thread Aurora Dellanno
Tee hee! As seen on IBM-MAIN. ciao! Aurora Emanuela Dell'Anno Compuware Ltd. Systems Engineer, Mainframe pre-Sales _ ___ ___ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. : +44 (0)1753 444331 cell.: +44 (0)7779

Re: Sharing unassigned tape

2006-10-18 Thread Shimon Lebowitz
On 18 Oct 2006 at 10:01, Kim Goldenberg wrote: The 4.4 and 5.2 are 2 different LPARs. 5.2 can only run in 64bit mode, and our 4.4 is 31bit, so 2nd level is out. Do you really mean different LPARs on different machines, or on the same machine, because if it's the latter, I'd better