I will be out of the office starting 03/08/2007 and will not return until
03/12/2007.
I will respond to your message when I return.
If your request requires immediate attention, Please contact the MVS
Technical Support Hotline
at 1-866-866-4488 x12000
I'm trying to set up a second level vm system following directions in
Z/VM Running Guest Operating Systems Chapters 6 and 7. Here's my
directory entry on first level:
USER VMTEST VMTEST 64M 128M BG
MACHINE ESA 2
OPTION TODENABLE
Anne -
You would use the 12FF disk for your 2nd level directory.
In fact you could not write the directory to 510W01 even if you
wanted to. 510W01 is not defined in your 2nd level machine.
/Fran Hensler at Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania USA for 43 years
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was confused as to whether I should put VM2CKP in the DIRECTORY stmt
as opposed to 510W01. I'm just not sure I set everything up right.
Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Dept of Administration - OT
304-558-5914 ext 8885
Fax 304-558-1351
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/8/2007 7:49 AM
Anne -
You
You could put 510W01 in your 2nd level directory but it would be a
minidisk on the real 510W01 volume.
If you have enough DASD you could define minidisks on your 1st level
machine from cylinder 1 to END for 510RES 510W01. Then logon on to
your 2nd level machine and restore DDR backups from your
That's probably what I want to do eventually. I'm trying to learn how
to do this so I can test maintenance somewhere before putting it on
production (which is my only option at the moment).
Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Dept of Administration - OT
304-558-5914 ext 8885
Fax 304-558-1351
You could restore yoour original install tapes to you 2nd level
machine and then apply maintenance.
/Fran
-
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 08:32:58 -0500 Anne Crabtree said:
That's probably what I want to do eventually. I'm trying to learn how
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:57:24 -0600, Adam Thornton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 7, 2007, at 11:00 AM, Brian Nielsen wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:57:31 -0600, Adam Thornton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll give you a dollar if you can show me a base in which 54 is more
than two and a half
Hi Anne,
The way you have defined things, you would need to use CPFMTXA or
ICKDSF to format your 12FF minidisk first, at which time you would
write the label VM2CKP on the volume. This virtual volume's cylinder
zero would be what your second level OPERATOR and directory would see.
It is real
OK good. That's the way I did it!
Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Dept of Administration - OT
304-558-5914 ext 8885
Fax 304-558-1351
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/8/2007 10:13 AM
Hi Anne,
The way you have defined things, you would need to use CPFMTXA or
ICKDSF to format your 12FF minidisk first,
Thanks to Eric and Shimon for your replies.
We have asked the supplier for PTFs, but we are not sure how much
mainframe experience they have. That could affect the quality of the
replies. Also, first hand experience can be more instructive then vendor
information, since vendor information is
Timezone_boundary on 2007-03-11 at 02:00:00 to EDT
Timezone_boundary on 2007-11-04 at 02:00:00 to EST
Timezone_boundary on 2008-03-09 at 02:00:00 to EDT
Timezone_boundary
Timezone_boundary on 2006-04-02 at 02:00:00 to EDT
Timezone_boundary on 2006-10-29 at 02:00:00 to EST
Timezone_boundary on 2007-03-11 at 02:00:00 to EDT
Timezone_boundary on 2007-11-04 at 02:00:00 to EST
Timezone_boundary on 2008-03-09 at 02:00:00 to EDT
Timezone_boundary on
Thanks.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Anne Crabtree
Sent: 03/08/2007 11:53 AM
Timezone_boundary on 2007-03-11 at 02:00:00 to EDT
Timezone_boundary on 2007-11-04 at 02:00:00 to EST
How bout just a plain old ³exit²?
--
.~.Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation
/V\RO-OC-1-13 200 First Street SW
/ ( ) \ 507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905
^^-^^ -
In theory, theory and practice are the same, but
in practice, theory
That should do it... :)
RPN01 wrote:
How ‘bout just a plain old “exit”?
--
.~.Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation
/V\RO-OC-1-13 200 First Street SW
/ ( ) \ 507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905
^^-^^ -
In theory, theory and practice are the
Yes, I'm having a real hard time with the virtual world but I'm
progressing... Thanks for all the help from everyone.
Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Dept of Administration - OT
304-558-5914 ext 8885
Fax 304-558-1351
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/8/2007 12:27 PM
The simple answer is that,
Don't forget to retain the record for the current period if you plan to
IPL before 3/11, otherwise you system may come up in GMT.
Ray Mrohs
U.S. Department of Justice
202-307-6896
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Yes, I'm having a real hard time with the virtual world but I'm
progressing
And some of us have a virtual time,
with the real, hard world.
Have a great weekend all! In Israel, TGIF comes on Thursday :-)
Shimon
--
...system may come up in GMT.
No, not may -- it absolutely WILL come up in GMT.
:blush on
Two weeks ago it took about 2 minutes to realize what *I* had done .. once
I stopped blaming the operators.
:blush off
Now. about future timezone dates... see the EXEC below. It produces a set
of
Thank-you Kris,
I downloaded this course and have been going through it.
It appears to be an excellent course.
As they say 'give a man a fish and you feed him for a day, teach him to fish
and you feed him for a lifetime'.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
You get my vote.
Not that you need it, your Poohbah-ness, sir.
Jon
snip
Once so elected I will issue a Grande Pooh-Bah Declaration that if it is wise
to save daylight in the summer, it's even wiser to save it in winter - so we'll
stay on Daylight Savings Time which will henceforth
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him to fish and he
will spend all day on a boat drinking beer.
Huegel, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@listserv.uark.edu
03/08/2007 02:20 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
Hello,
We are running z/VM 3.1.
With the TCP/IP that ships with the above is it possible to have the
ftpserver operate in passive mode. I am looking inSRVRFTP CONFIG
and I do not see anything referring to passive mode. Is there another
config file somewhere ?
Thank you in advance.
Neil
Hi,
Is anyone running multiple VM SMTP servers to address problems with
mail agents getting timeouts because VM SMTP is busy?
I was planning on adding one more SMTP server listening at the same port.
Is there a way to dedicate one server to incoming mail and another for
outgoing?
Thanks.
Ah.. you are most wise to finish up with sir, Grasshopper.
It may be a violation of this list's nettiquet if I were forced to send my
black knights who would to forcibly administer a prefrontal lobotomy. Such
would result in yet another new
insert_operating_system_of_your_choice_here
Hi all,
I have a 4.4 system that's moving to a new z9 and when they try to start
the TCP/IP connection through the new OSA gigabit (fiber, not copper),
they get:
DTCOSD055E The amount of input and or output queues supported by this
adapter is insufficient for TCP/IP
And then the link
Sheesh, you guys, he thought it was the way you get the automated
list reponse. Tell him how to unsubscribe from the list!
William Munson wrote:
Marty,
What do you need HELP with?
Bill Munson
IT Specialist
Office of Information Technology
State of New Jersey
(609) 984-4065
President MVMUA
From the listserv list:
Folks still running Windows 2000 should be aware that Windows Update
does not provide a DST fix. You need to go to
http://support.microsoft.com/gp/dst_hu1 to get the tzedit.exe utility
for that purpose.
I am not sure if you need this for XP. That site asks for which
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:05:28 -0500 Aria Bamdad said:
Hi,
Is anyone running multiple VM SMTP servers to address problems with
mail agents getting timeouts because VM SMTP is busy?
I was planning on adding one more SMTP server listening at the same port.
Is there a way to dedicate one server to
On Thursday, 03/08/2007 at 10:39 EST, A. Harry Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:05:28 -0500 Aria Bamdad said:
I was planning on adding one more SMTP server listening at the same
port.
Is there a way to dedicate one server to incoming mail and another for
outgoing?
31 matches
Mail list logo