Re: D/R Code

2007-10-05 Thread RPN01
That seems a lot of work, when you could just ask the system who it is, and set the system's name based on its serial number. On the TCPIP front, again, you can just have two config files w/ the system name as the FN, and be done with it. No editing at startup. -- .~.Robert P. Nix

Re: D/R Code

2007-10-05 Thread Stracka, James (GTI)
That is why we have our users run an exec that tests the CPUID and System Configuration file name. You need to distinguish among: Normal production, Test CNR and Production CNR. We want it to be completely automated once the system is IPLed. -Original Message- From: The

Re: D/R Code

2007-10-05 Thread Stracka, James (GTI)
Great, but you would like that to be set automatically somehow, not manually after each IPL. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Huegel, Thomas Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 9:43 AM To:

Re: D/R Code

2007-10-05 Thread Huegel, Thomas
Personally I like the idea of being able set a CP system variable. CP SET SYSTEM VARIABLE 'variable name' 'variable data'. That way each installation could easily customize how they wanted to use the variables. Maybe even allow x-system variables. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM

Re: D/R Code

2007-10-05 Thread Mary Anne Matyaz
We run a lot of things off of the system name, so it needs to be the same, whether we are on processor A, processor B as real dr or processor B as test DR. MA On 10/5/07, RPN01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That seems a lot of work, when you could just ask the system who it is, and set the

Re: D/R Code

2007-10-05 Thread pfa
How about a CP SET/QUERY UPSI like they have in DOS :-) Huegel, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 10/05/2007 09:43 AM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re:

Re: D/R Code

2007-10-05 Thread Stracka, James (GTI)
Wow, the UPSI switch in DOS JCL! I have not used that since 1976. That brings back some memories. Thanks -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 9:50 AM

Re: D/R Code

2007-10-05 Thread Rob van der Heij
Following this thread, it looks like I am the only one who has concerns about code in the system that will distinguish between production, DR (and maybe even DR test). Most certainly you want such checks only in your own code (which has no errors and does not need testing) and not in the code that

Re: D/R Code

2007-10-05 Thread Thomas Kern
I don't think this would be for application level usage but only for syst em initialaztion, SVM configuration, etc, before real users/apps get started . I don't know if I would want a SAS covering exec to query a system variab le to see if it should run, but a SAS SVM should check its PRODUCT

Re: D/R Code

2007-10-05 Thread Thomas Kern
Any CP environment variable system needs to be initialized during system IPL. A new SYSTEM CONFIG entry would be needed for initial variable names and values. Again arbirary names with arbitrary string values. Through th e current SYSTEM CONFIG syntax, you could have different settings based on

Re: D/R Code

2007-10-05 Thread Mike Walter
IMHO, such a command needs to be set in many ways, including but not limited to: - Permit it to be set as an authorized/restricted CP command (perhaps permitting a limited number of Privclass G SET commands for apps to use?) - Permit it to be set by the SYSTEM CONFIG file (perhaps based on

Re: D/R Code

2007-10-05 Thread Fran Hensler
Robert - No, it's not a lot of work. it's all automatic thru one EXEC on AUTOLOG1. No manual intervention of any kind. My DR FLEX-ES system has the same serial number as my production system so checking the CPUID is not an option. /Fran

CSE: It's the little things that'll get ya...

2007-10-05 Thread RPN01
I¹m in the process of building our z/VM 5.3 systems, and I think I¹m down to the last hurdle I can¹t get CSE to fire up across PVM. The message I¹m getting in PVM is: DVMISG864E CSE is not authorized The description of the message says that CSE is not available or not set up, but, to the