On Tuesday, 01/29/2008 at 09:27 EST, Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the TCPIP logs are in the TCPMAINT RDR queue but nothing is
current. Everything is before the re-ipl.
1. Logon to TCPMAINT
2. NETSTAT CP CLOSE CONS
3. A RDR file will arrive from TCPIP
4. RDRLIST
If
On Monday, 01/28/2008 at 06:08 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AIX had connectivity once the physical switch was back online.
our zVM 4.4 vswitch did not - thus the question of how to get it back.
AIX 5.3 has VIO servers which allow for failover between network
connections -
but, no -
it
Exactly, current console logs for TCPIP.
Bobby Bauer
Center for Information Technology
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892-5628
301-594-7474
-Original Message-
From: Dave Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 9:07 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Folks,
I've been informed that we're moving to new physical dasd
probably next week. So, I think this will work but was looking for
verification
Backup current System config to from cf1 to cf2.
Change system config to new CUA's. We're moving one for one 2000 - 4000.
Update CF1
There are a number of ways you can do this using the Stand-Alone
Program Loader (SAPL) screen at IPL time.
You can optionally display this screen by specifying
a 3270-capable console address in the LOADPARM field of your hardware
console (or on the IPL command).
Rather than specifying the
At 10:56 AM 1/29/2008, John Franciscovich wrote:
There are a number of ways you can do this using the Stand-Alone
Program Loader (SAPL) screen at IPL time.
You can optionally display this screen by specifying
a 3270-capable console address in the LOADPARM field of your hardware
console (or on
As usual, Kris is correct.
But I've always taken a slightly different approach:
1) Get R/W access to the CF1 disk as, for example, I.
2) COPYFILE SYSTEM CONFIG I -1SYSTEM CONFIG O (OLDDATE
3) XEDIT SYSTEM CONFIG I
4) Make needed changed, and FILE it knowing that you still have -1SYSTEM
CONFIG I
Since Bob mentioned CA VM:Spool, I should also point out IBM's solution f
or
viewing live consoles: IBM Operations Manager for z/VM.
Operations Manager allows you to view and interact with the console of a
disconnected service machine (including a Linux guest, of course) from yo
ur
own VM
Yes indeed, that's enough.
And, if CF1 and CF2 are allocated as PARM, no need to remember the cylinder
numbers, just say the n'th PARM disk in the EXTENT field
2008/1/29, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Folks,
I've been informed that we're moving to new physical dasd probably next
week.
Check TCPIP print queue. Current console log should be there in OPEN status.
You need to close that spool file to receive it in TCPMAINT reader.
- Mensaje original
De: Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Enviado: martes 29 de enero de 2008, 12:26:19
Bobby, what kind of current 'logs' are you looking for? Perhaps the
console logs from OPERATOR or TCPIP?
Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] wrote:
We are new to z/VM (5.3 on a z9) and I have a basic question. How do I
access the current logs?
I can see in RDRLIST under MAINT for instance, a file
We are new to z/VM (5.3 on a z9) and I have a basic question. How do I
access the current logs?
I can see in RDRLIST under MAINT for instance, a file for MAINT that
appears to be the log for yesterday but I don't see anything for this
morning after I re-ipled.
Bobby Bauer
Center for
By default, I believe, the console logs for the TCPIP virtual machine
are spooled to TCPMAINT. Go look in it's rdr queue.
Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] wrote:
Exactly, current console logs for TCPIP.
Bobby Bauer
Center for Information Technology
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD
Yes, the TCPIP logs are in the TCPMAINT RDR queue but nothing is
current. Everything is before the re-ipl.
Bobby Bauer
Center for Information Technology
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892-5628
301-594-7474
-Original Message-
From: Dave Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I suspect you are talking about the OPEN console logs, which you can't
look at unless you either close them (#CP SPOOL CONS CLOSE) which will
move them to a reader where they can be PEEKed or RECEIVEd, OR I have
always had CA's VM:SPOOL which allows an authorized user to browse spool
files of
There it is! That is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks for the
info.
Bobby Bauer
Center for Information Technology
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892-5628
301-594-7474
-Original Message-
From: Alan Altmark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008
On Jan 29, 2008 9:45 PM, Huegel, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may be a requirement to ask IBM to prepare better 'rejection
documentation'.
But in the end, you'd like IBM not to reject the requirements, but
implement them... Making it harder to reject them is a way to
influence the
On Tuesday, 01/29/2008 at 03:24 EST, David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
After having written up a lot of the requirements discussed here and
submitting
them through a recognized user group, I received a number of rejection
notices
with a reason of ?not in plan?.
Could someone at IBM
It may be a requirement to ask IBM to prepare better 'rejection
documentation'.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of David Boyes
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 2:22 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Not in Plan response to
You can also get a little help from my URLIST tool, part of:
http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages/descript.cgi?LISTSG
You'd issue URLIST TCPIP and get an RDRLIST-like list of the RDR, PRT
and PUN queue of TCPIP. The open console file will be included;
URLIST doesn't provide anything to view
After having written up a lot of the requirements discussed here and
submitting them through a recognized user group, I received a number of
rejection notices with a reason of not in plan.
Could someone at IBM explain this reason a little further? I thought the
point of user requirements was
But in the end, you'd like IBM not to reject the requirements, but
implement them... Making it harder to reject them is a way to
influence the trade-off, but not the most efficient way.
Yes. The basic tradeoff I'd hope for is that the response at least be
thoughtful enough to tell us why the
Sometimes a requirement does not pass Go or collect $200 and is
rejected
or accepted outright. Of course, business needs change all the time,
so a
Rejection or Acceptance is no guarantee that it will never see the
light
of day or that it will be in release n+1.
But remember that our
23 matches
Mail list logo
