> I don't know why Unix used NL (==LF) instead. Perhaps a different har
> dware device?
One reason (probably not the only one, but one):
Bare CR on the model of DECwriter commonly shipped as PDP-11 console
terminals tended to foul the ribbon, especially if you issued it from
>40 character positi
I will be out of the office starting 07/25/2008 and will not return until
08/04/2008.
I will be out of the office starting Fri. 7/25, returning Mon. 8/4. I will
have no access to Email or voice mail.
If you need assistance while I am out, please contact Scott Hutula
([EMAIL PROTECTED], 704-427
I too have spent time writing code to deblock files with various delimite
rs. Darn waste of time! Some
hardware devices LF just moved the platen up one, while CR moved the head
back to the left margin.
I don't know why Unix used NL (==LF) instead. Perhaps a different har
dware device? I'm even l
z/VOS is written to support the x86 instruction set and the underlying
hardware rather than a specific operating system. For example, FreeDos was
used as the initial debug target operating system due to source code
availability.
--. .- .-. -.--
Gary Dennis
Mantissa Corporation
On 7/23/08 9
Already in the works not for San Jose (Gary won't be there), but for
Austin, TX, next March 1-6, 2009.
Gary reported that it would tie in nicely with their targeted release
date.
Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone and do not necessarily
represent
Rich
As you know there has been some buzz about Windows on zVM. Would you have
any idea if Mantissa is planning on a presentation at this coming SHARE
meeting. I am absolutely certain that a lot of people would be interested in
attendingIn fact I would be willing to chair the session.
Da
On Thursday, 07/24/2008 at 04:39 EDT, "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> What manual do you use to determine there is a special Unit Check? Is it
> online where I can see it?
I am using the IBM Publications Center,
http://www.elink.ibmlink.ibm.com/publications/servlet/pbi.wss and rea
It is acting more and more like one all the time :-) That is the point
of all of this - to not get phony error messages from the devices when
performing normal functions (such as RUN during DETACH or Logoff). We
have made a lot of progress from streaming unsolicited interrupts, to
reflecting a stat
On Thursday, 07/24/2008 at 04:05 EDT, "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The vendor of the pseudo tape unit has changed several things in the
response
> during a Detach so that CP now issues only a single message,
"HCPERP2215A TAPE
> 0670 REQUIRES OPERATOR INTERVENTION; MAKE DRIVE
Maybe the device went 'Not Ready' before CP was able to send the
Rewind/Unload command and that is why CP wants Operator intervention, to
get
the tape rewound and unloaded.
/Tom Kern
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:04:44 -0700, Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
e:
>
>The vendor of the pseudo tap
The vendor of the pseudo tape unit has changed several things in the
response during a Detach so that CP now issues only a single message,
"HCPERP2215A TAPE 0670 REQUIRES OPERATOR INTERVENTION; MAKE DRIVE
READY", which brings up a question. Why does CP care that the drive is
not ready when it is
If so, then unlikely that CMS would run on "cell blade engines", and emulation not
required. With IBM now owning platform, who did seem to have this kind of technology,
there are feasible options that would actually be marketable.
Quay, Jonathan (IHG) wrote:
It is my understanding that IBM i
It is my understanding that IBM intends to integrate Cell Blade engine
(e.g. playstation 3) technology into the z/Series ecosystem. This would
seem to me to be the place where massively parallel high intensity cpu
workload would live in the not so far flung future.
-Original Message-
From
One thought on a single LPAR system and DirmSat: You can use DirmSat on a
single system to maintain a directory on another volume, such that if you
have a problem with your primary CP Directory volume, you have a backup to
that that can be quickly activated without having to resort to tape.
--
Ro
I'll second the motion. Track is great and Jim's efforts are very much
appreciated.
I emailed him a week or so ago with a question on a problem that I had
seen since going from z/VM 4.4 to z/VM 5.3 last summer. The sysprogs'
personal id's here have CP priv. classes EG. With 4.4 we had been
Yes, but that doesn't give you a formatted display of the prefix page,
it just points to it.
Since the demise of Kprobe, I don't think that Track has had any serious
competition in this arena.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
>
> But for "next time", the command is: CP LOCATE symbol E.g.
> cp locat
You bet, TRACK rules.
But for "next time", the command is: CP LOCATE symbol
E.g.
cp locate symbol hcppfx
HCPPFX = 00024000 Resident 002000 Bytes
Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone and do not necessarily
represent the opinions or polici
I wanted to check the VM prefix page to see if something was enabled,
and I have forgotten how to find display CP control blocks in storage.
In looking around for a how-to, I found a reference to our old friend
Track being able to display the prefix page. Problem solved. A BIG
'Thank You!' to Jim V
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:08:37 +0100, Malcolm Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>The redbook "HiperSockets Implementation Guide" (SG24-6816)
>available from http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg246816.html
>explains the common case in section 1.3:
>
>HiperSockets operations are executed on
On Thursday, 07/24/2008 at 01:29 EDT, Alan Ackerman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Internet has a standard record separator of CRLF. In theory, that
> should avoid all these incompatibilities. However, if you use Binary
> FTP transfer, then all bets are off. And some Unix programs use LF
> inst
[snip]
>
> The Internet has a standard record separator of CRLF. In
> theory, that sho=
> uld avoid all these
> incompatibilities. However, if you use Binary FTP transfer,
> then all bets=
> are off. And some Unix
> programs use LF instead of CRLF, on the assumption that
> everything in the=
Rempel, Horst writes:
> I am a little bit confused because on of your german IBM colleagues told me
> that hipersocket transfers is the
> job of the service processor (I/O processor) and will allways run at full
> speed independent of the capacity setting for the cpu.
The redbook "HiperSockets
Hello Alan,
I am a little bit confused because on of your german IBM colleagues told me
that hipersocket transfers is the
job of the service processor (I/O processor) and will allways run at full speed
independent of the capacity setting for the cpu.
What is if you downgrade a cpu, will you lowe
23 matches
Mail list logo