Someone wrote:
Oh come on Alan, you learn the new machine (not assembler)
instructions the IBM way, you look at what the PL/X
(or whatever it is called today) compiler generates
I think I started learning assembler from the code that
the Fortran G and H compilers generated. Next was
We just installed VM 5.2 under z/890 and want to take backup (image copy) of
system packs on DASD (DS8100)
just for disaster recovery to IPL VM from another volume.
ddr required native volumes.
Pls advice
We just installed VM 5.2 under z/890 and want to take backup (image copy) of
system packs on DASD (DS8100)
just for disaster recovery to IPL VM from another volume.
ddr required native volumes.
Pls advice
On: Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 03:15:30PM +0300,rizwan Wrote:
} We just installed VM 5.2 under z/890 and want to take backup (image copy) of
system packs on DASD (DS8100)
} just for disaster recovery to IPL VM from another volume.
} ddr required native volumes.
If you know how to use DDR, quite
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Rich Greenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One BIG gotcha that will bite you the next VM IPL is you will now have
several duplicate volsers out there, and while the volume you IPL from
is known and fixed, it is difficult to predict which half of the other
pairs
VM:Backup HiDRO is adept at creating full volume backups. I assume since you
said disaster recovery you mean to tape and offsite. When you get to your
disaster site, you IPL a HiDRO tape, which does the restores of the system
packs. You can then IPL the system to restore the rest of the
Easy Alan, it was a joke, and I realize that z/VM is probably among the last
group in IBM able to default to the latest machine instructions, due to the
need to support those with older hardware.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original
Glen,
The sad reality (despite my tongue in cheek comment to Alan, and that you
probably know) is that reading output of compilers is the worst way to learn
assembler. Since you only see the code to actually perform the operation in
the program, while all the environment set up is already done
On Sunday, 08/03/2008 at 02:54 EDT, Wayne Driscoll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Easy Alan, it was a joke, and I realize that z/VM is probably among the
last
group in IBM able to default to the latest machine instructions, due to
the
need to support those with older hardware.
:-) I think you'll
Hi
I IPL'ed both of my z/VM 5.3 LPARS on Sunday. After the VAL/DEV LPAR was
brought up I started to logon and IPL the Linux guests. I had no
problems on this LPAR.
Now, after I IPL'ed the PROD LPAR I started to bring up the PROD Linux
guests. This time when I logged on the guests the
Terry,
check the following:
IOCDS definitions for the second LPAR. Was a new IOCDS created?
SYSTEM CONFIG file for the PROD LPAR
AUTOLOG1 Profile exec and all profile execs involved in bringing up the z/VM
system in PROD LPAR
Something must have been changed. I'm betting on the IOCDS.
Look in your system config file you used to IPL your production system
and make sure there are values for all your user volumes which cause
them to be attached to your system at IPL time
They will look something like this, I use wild cards because we have a
naming convention associated with each
I will be out of the office starting 04/08/2008 and will not return until
06/08/2008.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Please consider the environment before deciding to print this email.
This email and any attachments are confidential and may be legally privileged
or protected
13 matches
Mail list logo
