I can only echo what others, (particularly Richard Schuh, with his very
good overview), has said.
We use VTAPE extensively and it really comes into it's own when you need a
large number of concurrent drives and the data on the virtual tapes is
small or indeterminate. Support from VSSI is
We considered VTAPE some years ago, but then went out and bought a
brand-new IBM VTS. It's shared between our (very old) VM/ESA 2.4 and
(even older) OS/390 systems.
It's set up so that OS/390 sees a string of 16x 3490Es and VM sees 32x
3490E.
We use a lot of NL tapes, and the data format on
Graeme Moss wrote:
Here is my experience with my testing of electronic delivery of z/VM.
It may be of use to others in similar situations or fellow listers may
be able to suggest improvements.
For electronic delivery IBM recommends the installer download the zip
files to their workstation,
I will also consider the MDL from BusTech. Linux appliance, and with ( far more
) installations, and supports also FICON 4. It goes from 1 ESCON Channel to 12
FICONS, and you can also attach any open system storage. Moreover, it replaces
a VTS, VSM, 3494, without a piece of software in the
I am setting up a guest VM system that will be using VSWITCH. Does
this require the first level host VM system to be running a vswitch?
Duane Weaver wrote:
I am setting up a guest VM system that will be using VSWITCH. Does
this require the first level host VM system to be running a vswitch?
No
Kim
I am curious what methods / tools are employed to do z/VM capacity planning?
I understand that there are a couple popular z/VM performance monitors.
What I'd like to better understand is what you may do to automatically
collect that data and feed it into something for capacity planning,
We use Velocity. ESAMAP runs at midnight automatically and as part of
the process have it send MICS formatted data to a z/OS system where the
Capacity folks run it through their stuff.
Bob Bates
Enterprise Hosting Services - Enterprise Virtualization - z/VM and
z/Linux
Ditto here. We send it via Standard Label (virtual) tapes with a 366 day retpd
in case it needs to be reproccessed.
Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
- Original Message -
From: Bob Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09/04/2008 04:38 PM EST
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM Capacity
We use the standard z/VM monitor data sent over (automatically) to z/OS daily
to be processed with MXG. It gets put to a weekly tape and saved for 52 weeks.
Paul Feller
AIT Mainframe Technical Support
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL
Any truth to this? Someone at work forwarded it to me. The web site works
.
David Boyes of Sine Nomine Associates is quoted.
MORE THAN HALF THE MAINFRAME MIPS IBM SELLS ARE LINUX?
http://go.techtarget.com/r/4319857/567040
Matt Stansberry, Senior Site Editor
By some estimates, since this past
I don't remember if anyone's mentioned this, so here goes. In VMFTP you
can get the full test of the error message as follows in your VMFTP file:
'put 'fn'.'ft'.'fm problem'.49R.000.'ofn'.'oft'.PACKED.1024'
If RC%100 2 Then Signal Oops
. . .
Oops:
On 9/5/2008 at 12:18 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alan
Ackerman[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any truth to this? Someone at work forwarded it to me. The web site works.
David Boyes of Sine Nomine Associates is quoted.
I doubt it. As was mentioned in one of the comments, the figures most
13 matches
Mail list logo