Not only Friday, but even the 13th
Long ago, the Piper convinced me of having signal on novalue in my
programs, and it saved my bottom part a few times... Had to think of
that again today. I get an IBM mass mailing from Partnerworld on a
regular basis. In the contact section, it provides ways to
As others have pointed out, DIRECTXA could not find the RPWLIST DATA file, which
should have been on MAINT's 2CC (C) disk.
One of the non-intuitive aspects of the RPWLIST DATA file is that it is required
to be present, even if you do not wish to restrict the passwords in that manner.
Perhaps
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Chip Davis c...@aresti.com wrote:
One of the non-intuitive aspects of the RPWLIST DATA file is that it is
required to be present, even if you do not wish to restrict the passwords in
that manner. Perhaps you have an External Security Manager, your own Rexx
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Dean, David (I/S) david_d...@bcbst.com wrote:
We have a z10 running zVM 5.4 in a dedicated LPAR with 3 dedicated IFL’s.
We have approximately 30 zLinux servers. Using IBM PerfKit, I list all of
the individual USER / zLinux CPU usages, each of which generally
I did this not too long ago and I had to do the IOCP (Dynamic I/O was
not configured but it is now). My IOCP now looks like this :
CHPID PATH=(10),TYPE=OSD,PCHID=110,PART=PROD
CHPID PATH=(11),TYPE=OSC,PCHID=111,PART=PROD
CNTLUNIT PATH=(10),UNIT=OSA,CUNUMBR=1460
IODEVICE
No OAT for TCP/IP. (I do believe that we have an OAT, for SNA though.)
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
Systems Programmer MCP, MCP+I, MCSE RHCE
American Income Life Insurance Co. Phone: (254)761-6649
1200 Wooded Acres Dr.Fax: (254)741-5777
Waco, Texas 76710
On Friday, 11/13/2009 at 05:13 EST, Rob van der Heij
rvdh...@velocitysoftware.com wrote:
You end up giving CPU resources to the wrong servers
and buying more hardware to overcome wrong settings.
HEY! You say that like it's a bad thing! If people want to buy more
hardware to solve their
On Friday, 11/13/2009 at 07:10 EST, Frankovich, Bob
bfrankov...@scspa.com wrote:
You do have to have 3 cuu's for QDIO and they must start with an
even/odd address. The third address does not have to be sequential, at
least for VSE. That way you can use all the addresses. Hope this
helps.
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:01:52 -0600, Alan Ackerman
alan.acker...@bankofamerica.com wrote:
Where are you getting the 99% number? Which version of Linux are you
running? Older versions of Linux were fooled by the CPU being taken away
and reported high values of CPU utilization in 'top' and
Regarding the Share command...
Apologize for the haphazard responses, I don't seem to be getting my zvm mail...
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of David Dean
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 9:26 AM
To:
Don't know, good point, I did not know that.
We have just installed zVm 5.4 on our system. Now we are running with a
SSLSERV that resides in VM/CMS. Since we have been at this level, we have been
getting TN3270 Telnet sessions running in Clear mode. We have included the
SSLSERVERID in our TCPIP stack but this has not corrected the
There is a SECURECONNECTION parm in the InternalClientParm section.
If this is SECURECONNECTION NEVER it will always be clear.
You probably want REQUIRED or PREFERRED.
Marci Beach
From:
Pelletier, Daniel daniel.pellet...@uconn.edu
To:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date:
11/13/2009
On Friday, 11/13/2009 at 10:41 EST, Pelletier, Daniel
daniel.pellet...@uconn.edu wrote:
We have just installed zVm 5.4 on our system. Now we are running with a
SSLSERV that resides in VM/CMS. Since we have been at this level, we
have been
getting TN3270 Telnet sessions running in Clear
I'm trying to setup ANONYMOUS for FTP.
I've created a 'nodeid DTCPARMS' and have established connectivity, but
I cannot get access to the home directory (VMSYSA:MAINT.PUBLIC). When
it attempts to establish the home directory, I get:
230-ANONYMOU logged in; no working directory defined
230
As Rob and Alan have less blatantly stated, Linux CPU numbers are bogus
in a virtual environment. The CPU reporting problem has been corrected
in ESALPS (now zVPS) for those that want to use linux numbers for
anything useful. If you don't have a mechanism to correlate the linux
cpu numbers
As Rob and Alan have less blatantly stated, Linux CPU numbers are bogus
in a virtual environment.
However, with the addition of steal percentage (%st in top), the amount
of CPU that is being stolen by the hipervisor, I believe many would
agree that they are less bogus.
Mike MacIsaac
Thank you
Now that you mention it, Rob has told me that in the past at a SHARE. I
sincerely wish I could use zVPS...8(
I will continue to not take reality - virtual or otherwise - seriously.
Life is too important to be taken seriously - Oscar Wilde.
-Original Message-
From: The
less bogus? Now I feel better.
Just kidding, I sincerely appreciate all the help I get from you guys. This
mail list has been priceless.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Michael MacIsaac
Sent: Friday, November
“less bogus”?
More meaningful?
Mike MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com (845) 433-7061
Less bogus is like less pregnant. If it is still bogus, it is only useful
for governmental purposes. :-)
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Michael MacIsaac
Sent: Friday, November 13,
On Friday, 11/13/2009 at 11:38 EST, Frank M. Ramaekers
framaek...@ailife.com wrote:
I'm trying to setup ANONYMOUS for FTP.
I've created a 'nodeid DTCPARMS' and have established connectivity, but
I cannot get access to the home directory (VMSYSA:MAINT.PUBLIC). When
it attempts to establish
Mike, Rob probably left you out of the loop when he showed the new
bogusness of the data with Sles10/11. It's more fun showing customers...
Michael MacIsaac wrote:
“less bogus”?
More meaningful?
Mike MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com (845) 433-7061
Thanks! I will check this out.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Marci Beach
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 11:13 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Clear Sessions with SSL under zVM 5.4
There is a SECURECONNECTION parm in the
Thanks Alan,,,
I will update our TCPIP stack with these parms and schedual it for our next
test period, (maybe next Tuesday).
I will send an update on the outcome.
I am curious though, why did this not affect us in v5.3?
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
Yep, needed the ENROLL USER ANONYMOU ...
Thanks,
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
Systems Programmer MCP, MCP+I, MCSE RHCE
American Income Life Insurance Co. Phone: (254)761-6649
1200 Wooded Acres Dr.Fax: (254)741-5777
Waco, Texas 76710
-Original
On Thursday, 11/12/2009 at 02:13 EST, Frank M. Ramaekers
framaek...@ailife.com wrote:
I'll need a GATEWAY for the VSWITCH? Why? It can't get to the outside
world,
only other hosts in the VSWITCH.
(I would think that any IP address in the network 10.1.20.128 would be
sent to
the
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Rob van der Heij rvdh...@gmail.com wrote:
Not only Friday, but even the 13th
Long ago, the Piper convinced me of having signal on novalue in my
programs, and it saved my bottom part a few times... Had to think of
that again today. I get an IBM mass mailing
I'm setting up Performance Toolkit according to the instructions in
Getting Started with Linux on System z for z/VM 5.4.0. This is just
for a proof of concept, so I'm starting with the defaults. The PROFILE
EXEC for MONWRITE on page 144 contains the following MONITOR EVENT
commands:
'CP MONITOR
29 matches
Mail list logo
