On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Gabe Goldberg g...@gabegold.com wrote:
More people likely see these notices here than would on Velocity's Web site,
so this seems a better place for them. A better solution seems to be for
people working at companies which think they can censor information
STSI can tell you if you are capped, but it can't tell you the weight.
Borrowing from the STSIUSE SAMPEXEC on MAINT 193:
/*
* Logical-partition CPUs*
C2B?
20 +++ lparchar=c2b(substr(result,36,1))
DMSREX478E Error 43 running STSIX EXEC, line 20: Routine not found
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Bruce Hayden
Ahh... Forgot that c2b was only in the internal Rexx functions
package. So, use Pipes instead:
'PIPE var result | specs 36.1 c2b 1 | var lparchar'
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Frank M. Ramaekers
framaek...@ailife.com wrote:
C2B?
20 +++ lparchar=c2b(substr(result,36,1))
DMSREX478E
I just used X2B(C2X(substr(result,36,1)))
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Bruce Hayden
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 8:49 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Capping info
Ahh...
I wrote REXX functions B2C, B2D, B2X, C2B, D2B, and X2B years ago. For example:
/*
C2B
++
||
| C2B(string)
On Wednesday, 03/24/2010 at 04:31 EDT, David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net
wrote:
On 3/24/10 3:40 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
When giving guests access to real cyl 0, I suggest:
1. If using a full-pack mindisk, use the DEVNO version instead of
volser.
That way it
Another point I¹ve not seen mentioned, and I¹m not sure if it¹s true or
not...
Given a dedicated volume to a Linux guest, won¹t the guest start only one
I/O to the device at a time, and wait for it to complete? If you break up a
larger volume into several minidisks (like a mod 27 into mod 9¹s)
Alan,
With it not being a full-pack as Mike mentioned in his post, there would always
have to be CCW translation, would there not? The question is whether that is a
significant hit compared to the full pack including Cyl 0. Considering that, in
the olden days, CP overhead was quite high
And you need to bear in mind that the rules, silly or not, are probably
mandated by state law in this case. Dan's suggestion about the automated FAQ
sent to new subscribers is a good starting point, and Mike's reminder (or one
like it) when there is an occasional breach of conduct is perfectly
You know the old virtualization saying, Never depend on the kindness
of
guests.
Alan Altmark
One might be entertaining angels unaware...8-)
Bad news...
Our IBM support that is not IBM... has not the IBM contract to open a PMR for
me... Don't laugh...
If someone here could do it for me...for the community... I would appreciate...
Alain Benveniste
Le 23 mars 2010 à 18:56, Mary Hottenstein a écrit :
I have recreated the reported
Actually, the REDISP log has contained this information since day zero ..
(shift right)
Eginhard
- Original Message -
From: Kris Buelens
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 4:24 PM
Subject: Friday gift - Perfkit ULOG
Those with RTM/ESA experience may
One needs to understand the syntax of a COMDIR entry. In this case, the
syntax is:
: nick.IOASERVR: :Luname.*USERID OSASF
: tpn.IOASERV
means: if a program want to create an APPC connection with resource
IOASERVR, CP will not use AVS, nor will it look for an existing, started,
There is maybe some misunderstanding: (leaving out PAV a while) a device can
handle only 1 IO at a time, guests know that, CP too. So indeed a linux
will not send a new IO if the previous one to that disk hasn't ended yet,
the guets will queue it. With several guests with minidisks on the same
On Thursday, 03/25/2010 at 12:11 EDT, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com
wrote:
With it not being a full-pack as Mike mentioned in his post, there would
always
have to be CCW translation, would there not? The question is whether
that is a
significant hit compared to the full pack including
On Thursday, 03/25/2010 at 11:45 EDT, RPN01 nix.rob...@mayo.edu wrote:
Another point I?ve not seen mentioned, and I?m not sure if it?s true or
not...
Given a dedicated volume to a Linux guest, won?t the guest start only
one I/O
to the device at a time, and wait for it to complete? If you
Neale: I received the following on the IBMVM moderator in-box. Rather
than pass to the list, I've opted to pass to you directly...
-dan.
On 3/24/2010 12:52 PM, Neale Ferguson wrote:
A gentle reminder that the next meeting of Hillgang will take place on
Friday 26 March, in Herndon Virginia
See, kids, this is what happens when you try to handle correspondence
under the influence of cold medicine...
Nothing going on in here. Please move along.
*sigh*
-dan.
On 3/25/2010 6:46 PM, Daniel P. Martin wrote:
Neale: I received the following on the IBMVM moderator in-box.
Rather than
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Daniel P. Martin dmar...@gizmoworks.comwrote:
See, kids, this is what happens when you try to handle correspondence
under the influence of cold medicine...
Nothing going on in here. Please move along.
*sigh*
I was going to say, FSVO 'directly'.
20 matches
Mail list logo
