Hello,
Thanks for the tips.
I'm not familiar using pipes but interested to try this.
I downloaded the DRPC stuff.
ddr
DMSMOD639E Error loading module DDR, return code 21 from DMSRLD
Invalid CMS command
Oops, my mistake. File corrupted during file transfer when uploading.
Now, testing
1. Att d1f * 181
2. DFSMSRM mount cat scratch0 (redev d1f
3. DDTEST1 DR A looks like this:
SY CONS
IN 123 DASD
OUTPUT PIPE
PROMPTS OFF
DUMP ALL
4. pipe ddr ddrtest1 ddr a ! tape tap1
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:10:41 -0500
From: alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: z/VM 6.1, SSLSERV Question
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
snip
Btw, I don't see very much pressure being placed on z/VM to provide
client-side TLS support for homegrown RxSocket or Pipeline apps. I see
The RSU plans page (http://www.vm.ibm.com/service/rsu/rsuplan.html) was
updated yesterday to state that the 6104 RSU will be made available this
month.
Note that you can get notified of changes to any page on the z/VM web site
via the Notify Me link on the left side of most of the web pages.
On Thursday, 12/02/2010 at 08:15 EST, Mark Wheeler
mwheele...@hotmail.com wrote:
It would be nice if UFT(D) would support it.
RFC 1440 does not define a mechanism for the UFT client and server to
negotiate and initiate TLS. A new RFC is needed. (Note that the IETF now
requires protocols to
From Susan Baloga at IBM:
The 6104RSU is in process now and should be available in the next few
weeks.
Colleen M Brown
IBM z/VM and Related Products Development and Service
From:
Bruce Hayden bjhay...@gmail.com
To:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date:
12/02/2010 08:26 AM
Subject:
Re: RSU 6104?
RXSSL comes to mind. As it happens, a couple of us were discussing RXSSL
off-list within the past day. Seems that it may need some attention to get
it working with the new VM SSL.
-- R;
Rick Troth
Velocity Software
http://www.velocitysoftware.com/
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:43, Schuh,
Bruce, Colleen,
Thank you for your updates.
Meanwhile I've also got the original one which rose a bit later than my post
here.
Wolfgang
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Colleen Brown
Sent: Thursday,
Yep. A new RFC is needed. The original author has been saying that for ten
years, has asked for collaborators, and is still open.
The original design intentionally left compression and encryption out of
scope. The advent of SSL suggests that was probably a good choice. ZIP has
been around
On Thursday, 12/02/2010 at 09:32 EST, Richard Troth vmcow...@gmail.com
wrote:
RXSSL comes to mind. As it happens, a couple of us were discussing
RXSSL
off-list within the past day. Seems that it may need some attention to
get it
working with the new VM SSL.
As I'm sure you have
Oops, my mistake. File corrupted during file transfer when uploading.
Now, testing
1. Att d1f * 181
2. DFSMSRM mount cat scratch0 (redev d1f
3. DDTEST1 DR A looks like this:
SY CONS
IN 123 DASD
OUTPUT PIPE
PROMPTS OFF
DUMP ALL
4. pipe ddr ddrtest1 ddr a ! tape tap1 wtm
HCPDDR696I VOLID
Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote :-
I would have thought that everyone's IT host network security
departments would be turning the screws on unencrypted and
unauthenticated
transmission to/from VM of any sensitive data and/or passwords. (You
mean you let MAINT's password flow
It is very simple. Look to this ddr command file:
INPUT DASD VMLEF3
OUTPUT 0181 TAPE 182 (COMPACT
SYSPRINT CONS
DUMP ALL
Now you only have to attach a scratch on 181 and 182. So mount a scratch
on
a real device and attach it to
On Thursday, 12/02/2010 at 10:08 EST, Richard Troth vmcow...@gmail.com
wrote:
The bottom line for UFT is to do over TCP what RSCS does over
CTC/VTAM/NJE, but
not in the way NJE/IP does. (Of course, it might be a good hint to the
present
NJE/IP authors and owners to create a UFT driver
No.
Look again.
There is an important topological difference between UFT and NJE-IP.
UFT is just another IP protocol (one that looks more like RSCS than, say,
FTP). Your network topology does not change.
While NJE-over-IP is a network-on-a-network. Full-blown RSCS, but with a
whole raft of
Does anyone have a sample SSL/TLS client assembler program that uses the VMCF
interface? And would you be willing to share it/ If so, it isn't a lost cause.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Would you consider using another product, say Connect:Direct? It can do
this.
Bob
What command are you issuing on the CMS client?
Alan Ackerman
18 matches
Mail list logo
