It is a hard sell to management to buy an ESM if there is no audit
requirement.
Thus my point about IBM quitting whining to us about buying one and start
supplying one by default as the Right and Proper Way.
On 12/9/10 3:27 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
In order to achieve the savings you imply, then z/VM must move to the
z/OS
model in which, except for a few specific functions, an ESM is required
for proper operation. NO native CP security controls beyone those
required to
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I've been saying for several years, You need an ESM. More and more
z/VM security management will be focused on ESMs, not native CP. If your
fave ESM doesn't simplify things for you, gripe to the vendor.
That's
I have down loaded MAILIT from the IBM VM Download page.
I can send a message to another VM user, it can be found in the users pun queue.
I can not figure out how to get an email to go out across the network.
Do I have to define something in TCPIP?
The operating system is z/VM 5.4 running on an
Alan,
The tcpip part is SMTP up and running.
also the VM user sending the MAIL needs to have a names file.
if your userid sending mail is NJ2W002 it is called NJ2W002 NAMESA
and it would look like this
:nick.Mike
:list.
mike.wal...@hewitt.com
:nick.ROB
:list.
Not necessarily, there is LOGONBY. They need only know their own passwords.
Should anyone have full authority including all the passwords? If so, who?
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of
Does it really matter? SOX is just another way congress has come up with to
destroy the American economy, and in fact the American way of life. Besides
all of our passwords are probably available on Wikileaks anyway.
Don't you just love the airport scanners and patdowns?
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Huegel
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 11:01 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Vswitch Grant as a CMD in User's Directory?
snip
Don't you just love the airport
Hi, Steve.
My question is. What can I do to retrieve the return code if this
fails or is successful?
The answer is: append (exit to FTP command.
See this sample (that sends PERFSVM summary files to GDG file at zOS). In
this case: binary, EBCDIC, variable records...
They spoil the patdowns by requiring that the genders of the patter and pattee
be the same :-)
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Tom Huegel
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 9:01 AM
To:
Does it really matter? SOX is just another way congress has come up with
to destroy the American economy, and in fact the American way of life.
That is not true. SOX was a much needed and overdue reform and perhaps
one of the best things both Bush and Congress did for the American
economy,
Does it really matter? SOX is just another way congress has come up with
to destroy the American economy, and in fact the American way of life.
That is not true. SOX was a much needed and overdue reform and perhaps
one of the best things both Bush and Congress did for the American
economy,
On Thursday, 12/09/2010 at 12:01 EST, Tom Huegel tehue...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does it really matter? SOX is just another way congress has come up with
to
destroy the American economy, and in fact the American way of life.
When you read the law, you find that SOX is simply a way to hold
On 12/9/2010 at 01:36 PM, George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
wrote:
Does it really matter? SOX is just another way congress has come up with
to destroy the American economy, and in fact the American way of life.
Given the current real life demands on our moderator, could we kill
good point Mark
Bill Munson
From: Mark Post mp...@novell.com
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date: 12/09/2010 01:46 PM
Subject:Re: Vswitch Grant as a CMD in User's Directory?
Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
On 12/9/2010 at 01:36 PM,
Very true, Alan.
But a good auditor always asks the question, Where is the risk?
It is pointless to look for controls, test controls, or require controls,
where there is no risk which a testing everything approach would try to
do.
It is the 20:80 rule.
80% of the risk can usually be covered
On Thursday, 12/09/2010 at 11:41 EST, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com
wrote:
Not necessarily, there is LOGONBY. They need only know their own
passwords.
They logon and access USER DIRECT. Now they know ALL the passwords. Of
course, you can have LBYONLY for everyone. But that misses the
You would HAVE to buy an ESM, whether from IBM or CA.
Or have IBM include a basic awful one (eg, RACF) in the price of VM and be
done with it. Including a basic one that can be replaced with Something
Else would make everybody (IMHO) happy. The internal cost of including
RACF can't be that large.
18 matches
Mail list logo
