I'm trying to dynamically add a page pack to our z/VM system and I've got a
situation that I don't have in my notes. z/VM 5.4 on a z9
I've formatted the volume (3330-3) as a page volume and defined a cpowned slot
for it.
def cpowned slot 10 VMPPG5
But when I display cpowned, it show as
ATTACH 100C TO SYSTEM
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]
baue...@mail.nih.gov wrote:
I’m trying to dynamically add a page pack to our z/VM system and I’ve got
a situation that I don’t have in my notes. z/VM 5.4 on a z9
I’ve formatted the volume (3330-3) as a page
ATT 100C SYSTEM
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 9:11 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Dynamically adding page space
I'm trying to dynamically add a page pack to our z/VM system and
You're missing:
ATTACH 100C TO SYSTEM
From: Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] baue...@mail.nih.gov
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date: 03/29/2011 09:10 AM
Subject:Dynamically adding page space
Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
I?m trying to
That would help!
I did that but it still didn't changed the cpowned state
Bobby Bauer
Center for Information Technology
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892-5628
301-594-7474
From: Karl Kingston [mailto:karlkings...@ongov.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 9:14 AM
To:
and now for the rest of the email
q cpowned
Slot Vol-ID Rdev Type Status
1 VMPRES 1003 OwnOnline and attached
2 VMPSPL 1004 OwnOnline and attached
3 VMPPAG 1002 OwnOnline and attached
4 VMPW01 1005 OwnOnline and attached
5 VMPW02 1006 Own
Do you have it attached to another user? After I format the disk, I do
the following:
detach the disk
do the def cpowned command
query cpowned to verify its there
then attach it to system
if you query the disk then you will see it online
Thanks
Scott
Are you sure you didn't make a typo when you defined the volume?
CP Owned shows the volser as VMPPG5 whereas the one attached to system is
VMPAG5?
From: Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] baue...@mail.nih.gov
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date: 03/29/2011 09:18 AM
Subject:Re:
your slot VOLID and your page pack VOLSER are DIFFERENT
Bill Munson
Sr. z/VM Systems Programmer
Brown Brothers Harriman CO.
525 Washington Blvd.
Jersey City, NJ 07310
201-418-7588
President - MVMUA
http://www2.marist.edu/~mvmua/
LVM Program Officer - SHARE
Well -- VMPPG5 is not VMPAG5.. relabel 100C to VMPPG5 and maybe it will
go better ;-)
Scott Rohling
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]
baue...@mail.nih.gov wrote:
and now for the rest of the email
q cpowned
Slot Vol-ID Rdev Type Status
1 VMPRES
3330-3 Really?
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 8:11 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Dynamically adding page
Thanks to everybody. Now working as expected
Bobby Bauer
Center for Information Technology
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892-5628
301-594-7474
From: Scott Rohling [mailto:scott.rohl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 9:24 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re:
Ah, those removable volumes, wonder there was a model 3 for it .
Regards Lim ML
On 29/03/11 9:29 PM, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
3330-3 Really?
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
*From:*The IBM z/VM Operating System
Bobby:
Volser must match. What is the correct: VMPPG5 or VMPAG5?
__
Clovis
From:
Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] baue...@mail.nih.gov
To:
IBMVM@listserv.uark.edu
Date:
29/03/2011 10:19
Subject:
Re: Dynamically adding page space
Sent by:
The IBM z/VM
Alan Altmark wrote:
everything an SE can do is possible
only via Single Object Operations.
So if an SE's IP address can be pinged from the corporate intranet, does
not that mean anyone from the intranet could do a POR or would the Single
Object Operations portal stop them?
Alan Altmark
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:33 PM, George Henke/NYLICAlan Altmark wrote:
So if an SE's IP address can be pinged from the corporate intranet, does
not that mean anyone from the intranet could do a POR or would the Single
Object Operations portal stop them?
Doesn't quite sound like Best
I think they's still need a valid user id and password. (and I believe
that these are NOT sent in the clear. i.e. HTTPS)
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
My concerns are all about IBM Support's ability to detect cracking
activity, and worse, ubercracker exploits on a platform crucial to Z
security that the Z customer has no way of even being aware of. That
goes against my grain and would give me nightmares with the right set
of responsibilities
There is a web interface, but I think that only works with the HMC. I think
you also have to enable the web interface for it to work. As an example in our
environment they do scans for non-compliant software or vulnerability scans. I
don't want those type of scans to hit my HMCs or SEs.
Dave_Craig__
'So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe.'
__--from_Nightfall_by_Asimov/Silverberg
They obviously have not heard of the
But if multiple interests have applied Anthropic technologies... ;-)
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:11 PM, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
Dave_Craig__
'So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
You'd better rearrange your
Check out Dr Aspect, Schroedinger's Cat in the Box,, the tunneling
effect which must be taken into account for chips to work.
Then fasten you seat belt because the last I heard Watson Lab's was
working on atomic memory which itself is based on observer created
reality. You know the tree in
Hello All,
We are curious to know if anyone is running any SLES 9 quests on a z196? In
test or production? With any issues?
It has come to our attention that the minimum requirements for the z196 are
SLES 10 and 11 but that IBM has tested SLES 9 w/SP4 and it is supported.
TIA!
Nick Harris,
Yes, we are. In a test environment at the moment.
Under z/VM 5.4 at current maintenance.
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not
use, copy, disclose, or take any
On Tuesday, 03/29/2011 at 02:59 EDT, Frank M. Ramaekers
framaek...@ailife.com wrote:
I think they?s still need a valid user id and password. (and I believe
that
these are NOT sent in the clear. i.e. HTTPS)
The security of the HMC/SE network is maintained by your use of the Domain
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:05 PM, David L. Craig d...@radix.net wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Mike Walter mike.wal...@aonhewitt.com
wrote:
Has the date been changed again since then?
Maybe--no one has actually _read_ the ObamaCare law. ;-) (and you
cannot check only the Federal
On 3/29/2011 at 05:56 PM, Harris, Nick J. nhar...@txfb-ins.com wrote:
Hello All,
We are curious to know if anyone is running any SLES 9 quests on a z196? In
test or production? With any issues?
It has come to our attention that the minimum requirements for the z196 are
SLES 10 and
It's hard enough to herd cats and when we finally have them all marching toward
summer 2011, someone buys a new machine 9 months before that date and moves
your cheese
Now if it were compiled for later than a z9 maybe it could exploit these shiny
new boxes better :)
And if we could only
On 3/30/2011 at 01:24 AM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com
wrote:
Now if it were compiled for later than a z9 maybe it could exploit these
shiny new boxes better :)
I suspect the workload you're running would see little or no improvement if all
of the OS were recompiled with
Mark wrote:
I suspect the workload you're running would see little or no improvement if
all of the OS were recompiled with -march and -mtune set higher. If your
middleware were all recompiled, that would likely be very different.
I suspect you are correct (what's new :).. When a WAS service
30 matches
Mail list logo
